Changes and adjustment in the foreign policy of Lithuania during Dalia Grybauskaitė’s presidency

References

• Alden, C., and A. Aran. 2017. Foreign Policy Analysis: New Approaches. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksa, K. 2015. “Šiaurės Šalys Lietuvos Užsienio Politikoje.” In Ambicingas Dešimtmetis: Lietuvos Užsienio Politika, 2004–2014, edited by D. Jakniūnaitė, 228–259. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
   Google Scholar
• Aleksiejūnas N. 2018. Interviu by the author, 16 April, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2000. “For Structure: Its Reality, Properties and Powers: A Reply to Anthony King.” The Sociological Review 48 (3): 464–472. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. 1976. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, E., and P. Ehin. 2009. Identity and Foreign Policy Baltic–Russian Relations and European Integration. Ashgate:Farnahm.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2008. Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2014. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blavoukos, S., and D. Bourantonis. 2014. “Identifying Parameters of Foreign Policy Change: An Eclectic Approach.” Cooperation and Conflict 49 (4): 483–500. doi:10.1177/0010836713517568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BNS. 2010. “JAV Ir Rusijos Nusiginklavimo Derybos Galėjo Pažeisti Baltijos Šalių Interesus, Pareiškė D.Grybauskaitė.” 5 September. https://www.15min.lt/naujiena/aktualu/lietuva/jav-ir-rusijos-nusiginklavimo-derybos-galejo-pazeisti-baltijos-saliu-interesus-pareiske-dgrybauskaite-56-114280
   Google Scholar
• Breuning, M. 2007. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brummer, K., and V. M. Hudson. 2015. Foreign Policy Analysis: Beyond North America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. 1992. “The Agency–structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 245–270. doi:10.2307/2600772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. 1993. “On Analysing the Dynamics of Foreign Policy Change: A Critique and Reconceptualization.” Cooperation and Conflict 28 (5): 5–30. doi:10.1177/0010836793028001001.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. 1994. “In Lieu of a Conclusion: Compatibility and the Agency–structure Issue in Foreign Policy Analysis.” In European Foreign Policy: The EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe, edited by W. Carlsnaes and S. Smith, 274–287. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsnaes, W. 2007. “How Should We Study the Foreign Policies of Small European States?” Nação E Defesa, 3rd Ser. 118: 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• de Rivera, J. H. 1968. The Psychological Dimension of Foreign Policy. Columbus: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, T. 2010. Neoclassical Realism and Defence Reform in Post-Cold War Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 2015. Studying Political Leadership: Foundations and Contending Accounts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 2018. Political Leadership: A Pragmatic Institutionalist Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1: Power, Property and the State. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1986. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldmann, K. 1988. Change and Stability in the International System: The Problems and Possibilities of Detente. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Gricius, A. 1997. “Europos Sąjungos Plėtimasis Ir Baltijos Šalių Saugumas.” Politologija 10: 82–97.
   Google Scholar
• Grybauskaitė, D. 2017. Interviews by the author, 31 March and 4 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Grybauskaitė, D. 2018. Interview by the author, 17 July 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, J. 1999. “How Should We Study Foreign Policy Change?” Cooperation and Conflict 34 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1177/00108369921961780.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner-Burton, E., S. Haggard, D. A. Lake, and D. G. Victor. 2017. “The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations.” International Organization 71 (Supplement S1): S1–S31. doi:10.1017/S0020818316000400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmann, G., and K. E. Jørgensen. 2015. Theorizing Foreign Policy in a Globalized World. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, C. F. 1990. “Changing Course: When Governments Choose to Redirect Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 3–21. doi:10.2307/2600403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G. 1977. A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G. 1980. “Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior Using Personal Characteristics of Political Leaders.” International Studies Quarterly 24: 7–46. doi:10.2307/2600126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G. 1986. Political Psychology: Contemporary Issues and Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G. 2005. “Assessing Leadership Style: Trait Analysis.” In The Psychological Assessment of Political Leaders: With Profiles of Saddam Hussein and Bill Clinton, edited by J. M. Post, 178–212. Dearborn: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G., and J. D. Hagan. 2001. Leaders, Groups, and Coalitions: Understanding the People and Processes in Foreign Policymaking. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G., P. Callahan, and L. Brady. 1982. Describing Foreign Policy Behavior. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, M. G., T. Preston, B. Korany, and T. M. Shaw. 2001. “Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals.” International Studies Review 3 (2): 83–131. doi:10.1111/1521-9488.00235.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, R. K. 2017. “How Attachments to the Nation Shape Beliefs about the World: A Theory of Motivated Reasoning.” International Organization 71 (Supplement S1): S61–S84. doi:10.1017/S0020818316000382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. R. 1967. “Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy.” Journal of International Affairs 21: 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M. 2005. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.” Foreign Policy Analysis No 1: 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. M., and B. S. Day. 2019. Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. 3rd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Jakniūnaitė, D. 2015. Ambicingas Dešimtmetis: Lietuvos Užsienio Politika, 2004–2014. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
   Google Scholar
• Janeliūnas, T. 2019. “Prezidento Įtaka Lietuvos Užsienio Politikos Formavimui: Galios Centro Pokytis D. Grybauskaitės Prezidentavimo Laikotarpiu.” Politologija 94 (2): 8–55. doi:10.15388/Polit.2019.94.1.
   Google Scholar
• Janeliūnas, T. 2019. “Prezidento Įtaka Lietuvos Užsienio Politikos Formavimui: Galios Centro Pokytis D. Grybauskaitės Prezidentavimo Laikotarpiu.” Politologija 94 (2): 8–55. doi:10.15388/Polit.2019.94.1.
   Google Scholar
• Jonavičius, L. 2021. “Geopolitical Projections of New Lithuanian Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis of a Baltic State: Lithuania and ‘Grybauskaitė Doctrine’ 17: 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Jonavičius, L. 2017. Interview by the author, 4 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jurgelevičiūtė, D. 2015. “Lietuvos Tarptautinis Subjektiškumas: Kokia Mažoji Valstybė?” In Ambicingas Dešimtmetis: Lietuvos Užsienio Politika, 2004–2014, edited by D. Jakniūnaitė, 49–74. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
   Google Scholar
• Kojala, L., and V. Ivanauskas. 2015. “Lithuanian Eastern Policy 2004–2014: The Role Theory Approach.” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review No 32: 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Laurinavičius, Č., V. Sirutavičius, and R. Lopata. 2009. “Kritinis Požiūris Į Lietuvos Užsienio Politiką: Kas Pasikeitė Nuo Augustino Voldemaro Laikų?” Politologija 54: 91–122. doi:10.15388/Polit.2009.2.8411.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. 1981. Structure, Interaction, and Social Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Layder, D. 1985. “Power, Structure, and Agency.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 15 (2): 131–149. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1985.tb00048.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniotaitė, G. 2005. “Search for Identity in Modern Foreign Policy of Lithuania: Between the Northern and Eastern Dimensions?” Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 2004: 69–84. doi:10.47459/lasr.2005.3.3.
   Google Scholar
• Miniotaitė, G. 2006. “Europos Normatyvinė Galia Ir Lietuvos Užsienio Politika.” Politologija 43: 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Miniotaite, G. 2003. “Convergent Geography and Divergent Identities: A Decade of Transformation in the Baltic States.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 16 (2): 209–222. doi:10.1080/09557570302047.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz, A. 2004. “How Do Leaders Make Decisions? A Poliheuristic Perspective.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1177/0022002703261056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintz, A. 2007. “Why Behavioral IR?” International Studies Review 9 (1): 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, J. F., and J. Paquin. 2018. Foreign Policy Analysis: A Toolbox. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nekrašas, E. 2004. “Lithuanian Foreign Policy: Concepts, Achievements and Predicaments.” Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review No 13–14: 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Nekrašas, E. 2009. “Kritiški Pamąstymai Apie Lietuvos Užsienio Politiką.” Politologija 54: 123–142. doi:10.15388/Polit.2009.2.8412.
   Google Scholar
• Neliupšienė, J. 2017. Interview by the author, 5 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Neliupšienė, J. 2018. Interview by the author 1 February 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A. 2005. “Starting from Scratch: The Role of Leadership in the Foreign Policymaking of the Baltic States, 1991–1999.” East European Quarterly 39 (2): 229–270.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A. 2015. “Post-Communist Leadership: A Case Study of Lithuania’s “White House” (1993–2014).” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 23 (2): 151–179.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A., and M. Paulionyte. 2016. “Lithuania’s Foreign Policy under Grybauskaite: Change or Continuity?” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 24 (4): 509–531. doi:10.1080/14782804.2015.1129941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patomäki, H. 2013. “Agency, Structures and Time: From Atemporal Ontologies to Explicit Geo-historical Hypotheses and Anticipation of Global Democracy.” In Rethinking Foreign Policy, edited by F. Bynander and S. Guzzini, 45–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Press Service of the President of Lithuania. 2010 “Lithuania Will Better Defend Its Interests in the EU through Closer Cooperation with Nordic Countries.” 22 March. https://www.lrp.lt/en/news/lithuania-will-better-defend-its-interests-in-the-eu-through-closer-cooperation-with-nordic-countries/8367
   Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B. 2008. “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism.” Security Studies 17 (2): 294–321. doi:10.1080/09636410802098917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., and T. Sedelius. 2019. “Shifting Power-Centres of Semi-Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania.” Government and Opposition 54 (4): 637–660. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters and Kyiv Post. 2010. “Vilnius Looks to Lukashenko in Belarus Poll.” 11 November. https://www.kyivpost.com/article/content/russia/vilnius-looks-to-lukashenko-in-belarus-poll-89621.html
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W., and P. ’T Hart. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, B. 1993. “Psychology, Foreign Policy, and International Relations Theory.” Political Psychology 14 (3): 403–416. doi:10.2307/3791705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripsman, N. M., J. W. Taliaferro, and S. E. Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosati, J. A. 1994. “Cycles in Foreign Policy Restructuring: The Politics of Continuity and Change in US Foreign Policy.” In Foreign Policy Restructuring: How Governments Respond to Global Change, edited by J. A. Rosati, J. D. Hagan, and M. W. Samson, 221–261. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51 (1): 144–172. doi:10.1017/S0043887100007814.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. L. 2003. “The Progressiveness of Neoclassical Realism.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by C. Elman and M. F. Elman, 311–347. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semaška, D. 2018. Interview by the author, 5 July 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. H., Jr. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1086/229967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šleivyte, J. 2009. Russia’s European Agenda and the Baltic States. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stanytė-Toločkienė, I. 2015. “Lietuva Ir ES Rytų Politika: Tarp Permainų Ir Tęstinumo.” In Ambicingas Dešimtmetis: Lietuvos Užsienio Politika 2004–2014, edited by D. Jakniūnaitė, 291–318. Vilnius: Vilniaus universiteto leidykla.
   Google Scholar
• Statkus, N., and K. Paulauskas. 2006. “Lietuvos Užsienio Politika Tarptautinių Santykių Teorijų Ir Praktikos Kryžkelėje.” Politologija 42: 12–61.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, C. G. 2018. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S. 1969. “Assumptions of Rationality and Non-rationality in Models of the International System.” In International Politics and Foreign Policy, edited by J. N. Rosenau, 217–231. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vilpišauskas, R. 2013. “Lithuanian Foreign Policy since EU Accession: Torn between History and Interdependence.” In The New Member States and the European Union Foreign Policy and Europeanization, edited by M. Baun and D. Marek, 127–142. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vitkus, G. 1995. “Baltijos Valstybių Saugumo Problemos Pobūdis.” Politologija 6: 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. G. 2011. “Foreign Policy Analysis and Behavioral International Relations.” In Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relation, edited by S. G. Walker, A. Malici, and M. Schafer, 3–20. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. G., A. Malici, and M. Schafer. 2011. Rethinking Foreign Policy Analysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioral International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, D. 2005. Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1987. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations.” International Organization 41 (2): 335–370. doi:10.1017/S002081830002751X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weymouth, L. 2014. “Lithuania’s President: ‘Russia Is Terrorizing Its Neighbors and Using Terrorist Methods.’” The Washington Post, 24 September. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/lithuanias-president-russia-is-terrorizing-its-neighbors-and-using-terrorist-methods/2014/09/24/eb32b9fc-4410-11e4-b47c-f5889e061e5f_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Weymouth, L. 2017. “Russia Is a Threat … to All of Europe.” Foreign Policy, 24 March https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/24/russia-lithuania-nato-grybauskaite-putin-trump-interview/
   Google Scholar