Teachers’ feelings of curriculum ownership: the Estonian case

References

• Akpan, B. B. 2010. “Innovations in Science and Technology Education through Science Teacher Association.” Science Education International 21 (2): 67–79. http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/june2010/p1_Ben_Akpan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Peretz, M. 1990. The Teacher-Curriculum Encounters. Freeing Teachers from Tyranny of Texts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2007. “Why ‘What Works’ Won’t Work: Evidence-based Practice and the Democratic Deficit in Educational Research.” Educational Theory 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2017. “Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a Space for Democratic Professionality in Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (4): 315–330. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleazby, J. 2015. “Why Some School Subjects Have a Higher Status than Others: The Epistemology of the Traditional Curriculum Hierarchy.” Oxford Review of Education 41 (5): 671–689. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1090966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, B., and J. Bragg. 2006. “A Curriculum without Foundation.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (4): 569–582. doi:10.1080/01411920600775225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catlaks, G. 2003. “Curriculum Development and Teacher Training in Latvia.” In Teacher Training and Curriculum Reform in the South Caucasus Religion. From Vision to Practice, edited by G. Catlaks, 27–30. Geneva: International Bureau of Education. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/6763285/regional-seminar-on-quality-education-for-all-teacher-training-
   Google Scholar
• Cerych, L. 1999. “General Report on the Symposium ‘Educational Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe: Processes and Outcomes.’.” European Education 31 (2): 5–38. doi:10.2753/EUE1056-493431025.
   Google Scholar
• Croll, P., D. Abbott, P. Broadfoot, M. Osborn, and A. Pollard. 1994. “Teachers and Education Policy: Roles and Models.” British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (4): 333–347. doi:10.1080/00071005.1994.9974007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearn, J. M. 2010. “Innovation in Teaching and Curriculum Design.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw, 448–454. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dedze, I., and G. Catlaks. 2001. “Who Makes Education Policy in Latvia?” Peabody Journal of Education 76 (3–4): 153–158. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2001.9681996.
   Google Scholar
• Erss, M., R. Mikser, E. Löfström, A. Ugaste, V. Rõuk, and J. Jaani. 2014. “Teachers’ Views of Curriculum Policy: The Estonian Case.” British Journal of Educational Studies 62 (4): 393–411. doi:10.1080/00071005.2014.941786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erss, M., V. Kalmus, and T. H. Autio. 2016. “‘Walking a Fine Line:’ Teachers’ Perception of Curricular Autonomy in Estonia, Finland, and Germany.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 48 (5): 589–609. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erss, M. 2018. “‘Complete Freedom to Choose within Limits’ – Teachers’ Views of Curricular Autonomy, Agency, and Control in Estonia, Finland, and Germany.” The Curriculum Journal 29 (2): 238–256. doi:10.1080/09585176.2018.1445514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estonian Education Information System (EEIS). 2013. https://www.haridussilm.ee
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teacher College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. 1994. “Implementation of Innovations.” In The International Encyclopedia of Education Encyclopedia, edited by T. Husén, and T. N. Postlethwaite , Oxford: Pergamon 2839–2847
   Google Scholar
• Goodson, I., S. Moore, and A. Hargreaves. 2006. “Teacher Nostalgia and the Sustainability of Reform: The Generation and Degeneration of Teachers’ Missions, Memory, and Meaning.” Educational Administration Quarterly 42 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L., and A. Qualter. 2010. “Chasing Improved Pupil Performance: The Impact of Policy Change on School Educators’ Perceptions of Their Professional Identity, the Case of Further Change in English Schools.” British Educational Research Journal 36 (6): 903–917. doi:10.1080/01411920903215853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., and R. H. Moos. 1978. “Subject Matter and Classroom Climate: A Test of Holland’s Environmental Propositions.” American Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 111–124. doi:10.3102/00028312015001111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiuk, R. M. 2014. “Ownership among Science Teachers.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 13 (1): 4–5. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol13/4-5.Janiuk_JBSE_Vol.13-1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. S., S. Broström, and O. H. Hansen. 2010. “Critical Perspectives on Danish Early Childhood Education and Care: Between the Technical and the Political.” Early Years 30 (3): 243–254. doi:10.1080/09575146.2010.506599.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, D. W., and T. F. Luschei. 2018. “Are Teachers Losing Control of the Classroom? Global Changes in School Governance and Teacher Responsibilities, 2000–2015.” International Journal of Educational Development 62: 289–301. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ježkova, V., E. Krull, and K. Trasberg. 2014. Školní Vzdělávání V Estonsku. Prague: Nakladatelství Karolinum.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, J., and M. V. Zuljan. 2007. “Teacher Perceptions of the Goals of Effective School Reform and Their Own Role in It.” Educational Studies 33 (2): 163–175. doi:10.1080/03055690601068329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardos, S. M., S. M. Johnson, H. G. Peske, D. Kauffman, and E. Liu. 2001. “Counting on Colleagues: New Teachers Encounter the Professional Cultures of Their Schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 37 (2): 250–290. doi:10.1177/00131610121969316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareda, E., V. Kornel, P. Kreitzberg, E. Sarv, E.-M. Vernik, and Ü. Voolaid. 1989. Main Principles for Reorganization of Public Education in Estonia. Tallinn: In-service Teachers’ Training Institute of Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, G. E. 2000. “Decentralized Centralism: Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education.” Journal of Education Policy 15 (5): 525–538. doi:10.1080/026809300750001676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasekamp, A. 2018. A History of the Baltic States. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. J. 2010. “School-based Curriculum Development for New Times: A Comparative Analysis.” In Schools as Curriculum Agencies. Asian and European Perspectives on School-based Curriculum Development, edited by E. H.-F. Law and N. Nieveen, 3–20. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kesküla, E., K. Loogma, P. Kolka, and K. Sau-Ek. 2012. “Curriculum Change in Teachers’ Experience: The Social Innovation Perspective.” Pedagogy, Culture and Society 20 (3): 353–376. doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.712051.
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, E., D. Beijaard, P. A. Henny, H. P. A. Boshuizen, and P. J. Den Brok. 2012. “Teachers’ Positioning Towards an Educational Innovation in the Light of Ownership, Sense-making and Agency.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (2): 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., and D. MacDonald. 2001. “Teacher Voice and Ownership of Curriculum Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 33 (5): 551–567. doi:10.1080/00220270010016874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitaevich, E. J. 2014. “History that Splinters: Education Reforms and Memory Politics in the Republic of Georgia.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 14 (2): 319–338. doi:10.1080/14683857.2014.906089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koķe, T., and I. Saleniece. 2015. “Education Policy in the Republic of Latvia: Lessons from Experience.” Paedagogica Historica 51 (1/2): 45–63. doi:10.1080/00309230.2014.997755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krull, E., and K. Trasberg. 2006. “Changes in Estonian General Education from the Collapse of the Soviet Union to EU Entry.” https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495353.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krull, E., and R. Mikser. 2010. “Reflection of Cross-curricular Ideas in the Estonian Curricula of General Education. An Historical Study.” Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 (1): 34–53. doi:10.3176/tr.2010.1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C. C., and S. S. Y. Yeung. 2010. “School-based Curriculum Development in Hong-Kong: An Arduous Journey.” In Schools as Curriculum Agencies. Asian and European Perspectives on School-based Curriculum Development, edited by E. H.-F. Law and N. Nieveen, 61–82. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Leat, D., K. Livingston, and M. Priestley. 2013. “Curriculum Deregulation in England and Scotland: Different Directions of Travel?” In Balancing Curriculum Regulation and Freedom across Europe. CIDREE Yearbook 2013, edited by W. Kuiper and J. Berkvens, 229–248. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO. http://www.cidree.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/yb_13_balancing_curriculum_regulation_and_freedom.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2007. “Deconstructing and Transgressing the Theory-Practice Dichotomy in Early Childhood Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (3): 275–290. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00324.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L. 2005. “A Matter of Self-governance and Control. The Reconstruction of Swedish Education Policy: 1980–2003.” European Education 37 (1): 10–25. doi:10.1080/10564934.2005.11042375.
   Google Scholar
• Mays, A. 2000. “The Initiation and Implementation of Educational Change: The Transformation Process in the Baltic States.” In Challenge and Change in Education: The Experience of the Baltic States in the 1990s, edited by B. Y. Peck and A. Mays, 191–215. Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Mikser, R., A. Kärner, and E. Krull. 2016. “Enhancing Teachers’ Curriculum Ownership via Teacher Engagement in State-based Curriculum-making: The Estonian Case.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 48 (6): 833–855. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1186742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikser, R., and I. Goodson. 2020. “Narratives of Education and Curriculum Transition in the Formerly Socialist European Countries: The Example of Estonia.” In Transnational Perspectives on Curriculum History, edited by G. McCulloch, I. Goodson, and M. Delgado-Gonzalez, 41–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mincu, M. E. 2016. “Communist Education as Odernization Strategy? The Swings of the Globalisation Pendulum in Eastern Europe (1947–1989).” History of Education 45 (3): 319–334. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2015.1127432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mølstad, C. E. 2015. “State-based Curriculum-making: Approaches to Local Curriculum Work in Norway and Finland.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 47 (4): 441–461. doi:10.1080/00220272.2015.1039067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moree, D. 2013. “Teachers and School Culture in the Czech Republic before and after 1989.” The Curriculum Journal 24 (4): 586–608. doi:10.1080/09585176.2013.831770.
   Google Scholar
• Nagrockaitė, Š. 2015. “Curriculum Concept in Lithuanian General Education School: Discourse Analysis.” PhD diss., Vilnius University. https://epublications.vu.lt/object/elaba:11916750/
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., and W. Kuiper. 2012. “Balancing Curriculum Freedom and Regulation in the Netherlands.” European Educational Research Journal 11 (3): 357–368. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.357.
   Google Scholar
• Pachociński, R. 1997. “Educational Development in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Education 29 (3): 6–25. doi:10.2753/EUE1056-493429036.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., S. Ball, M. Maguire, and A. Braun. 2011. “Life in the Pressure Cooker – School League Tables and English and Mathematics Teachers’ Responses to Accountability in a Results-driven Era.” British Journal of Educational Studies 59 (2): 179–195. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.578568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., T. Kostova, and K. T. Dirks. 2001. “Towards a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 298–310. doi:10.2307/259124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., T. Kostova, and K. T. Dirks. 2003. “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research.” Review of General Psychology 7 (1): 84–107. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzoi, E., and M. Černá. 2001. “A Dynamic Model of Forces Affecting the Implementation of Educational Change in the Czech Republic.” Comparative Education Review 45 (1): 64–84. doi:10.1086/447645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. 2010. “Schools, Teachers, and Curriculum Change: A Balancing Act?” Journal of Educational Change 12 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1007/s10833-010-9140-z.
   Google Scholar
• Raudma, T. 2003. “Changes in the Estonian Educational System: Responding to EU Trends.” In The Baltic States, Education and the European Union, edited by B. T. Peck, 25–31. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Rõuk, V., J. L. van der Walt, and C. C. Wolhuter. 2018. “Science of Pedagogy in Soviet Estonia (1944–1991): Resilience in the Face of Adversity.” History of Education 47 (1): 108–124. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2017.1373305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubene, Z. 2010. “Topicality of Critical Thinking in the Post-Soviet Educational Space. The Case of Latvia.” European Education 41 (4): 24–40. doi:10.2753/EUE1056-4934410402.
   Google Scholar
• Ruus, V., and E. Sarv. 2000. “Changes in Estonian School Curricula (1987–1999) and Thoughts about Future.” In Challenge and Change in Education: The Experience of the Baltic States in the 1990s, edited by B. Y. Peck and A. Mays, 141–152. Huntington: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. 2002. “Reflections on the Reform of Higher Education in Central and Eastern Europe.” Higher Education in Europe 28 (1–2): 137–152. doi:10.1080/0379772022000003288.
   Google Scholar
• Silova, I., and B. Eklof. 2013. “Education in Eastern and Central Europe: Re-thinking Post-Socialism in the Context of Globalization.” In Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local, edited by R. F. Arnove, C. A. Torres, and S. Franz, 379–402. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Silova, I., and G. Steiner-Khamsi. 2008. “Introduction: Unwrapping the Post-Socialist Education Reform Package.” In How NGO-s React: Globalization and Educational Reform in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia, edited by I. Silova and G. Steiner-Khamsi, 1–42. Bloomfield: Kumarian.
   Google Scholar
• Silova, I. 2011. “Introduction: Education and Postsocialist Transformations in Central Asia – Exploring Margins and Marginalities.” In Globalization in the Margins. Education and Postsocialist Transformation in Central Asia, edited by I. Silova, 1–26. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K., J. van Den Akker, and M. Rosenmund. 2012. “Editorial. The European Curriculum: Restructuring and Renewal.” European Educational Research Journal 11 (3): 320–327. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.320.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., F. Bolin, and K. Zumwalt. 1992. “Curriculum Implementation.” In Handbook of Research on Curriculum, edited by P. W. Jackson, 402–435. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stodolsky, S. S., and P. L. Grossman. 1995. “The Impact of Subject Matter on Curricular Activity: An Analysis of Five Academic Subjects.” American Educational Research Journal 32 (2): 227–249. doi:10.3102/00028312032002227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs, A., and J. van Den Akker, eds. 2009. Curriculum in Development. Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Tuul, M., R. Mikser, E. Neudorf, and A. Ugaste. 2015. “Estonian Preschool Teachers’ Aspirations for Curricular Autonomy – The Gap between an Ideal and Professional Practice.” Early Child Development and Care 185 (11–12): 1845–1861. doi:10.1080/03004430.2015.10287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 1996. “Eesti Põhi- Ja Keskhariduse Riikliku Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/29725
   Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 2002. “Põhikooli Ja Gümnaasiumi Riiklik Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/174787
   Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 2011a. “Gümnaasiumi Riiklik Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/120092011002
   Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 2011b. “Põhikooli Riiklik Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114012011001
   Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 2018a. “Põhikooli Riiklik Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114022018008
   Google Scholar
• Valitsus, V. 2018b. “Gümnaasiumi Riiklik Õppekava. Vabariigi Valitsuse Määrus.” Riigi Teataja. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/114022018009
   Google Scholar
• Viirpalu, P., E. Krull, and R. Mikser. 2014. “Investigating Estonian Teachers’ Expectations for the General Education Curriculum.” Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 16 (2): 54–70. doi:10.2478/jtes-2014-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. C. 2012. Neoliberalism and the Global Restructuring of Knowledge and Education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, R. M. 1997. “Questionnaires.” In Educational Research Methodology, and Measurement: An International Handbook, edited by J. P. Keeves, 422–426. 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. 2008. “How Does the New Emphasis on Managerialism in Education Redefine Teachers’ Professionalism? A Case Study in Guangdong Province of China.” Educational Review 60 (3): 267–282. doi:10.1080/00131910802195869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., V. M. Baumfield, D. Egan, L. Hayward, M. Hulme, I. Menter, C. Gallagher, R. Leith, K. Livingston, and B. Lingard. 2013. Creating a Curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zelvys, R. 2004. “Development of Educational Policy in Lithuania during the Years of Transformations.” International Journal of Educational Development 24 (5): 559–571. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zogla, I. 2001. “Democratisation in Latvian Education: Teachers’ Attitudinal Change.” European Journal of Teacher Education 24 (2): 143–156. doi:10.1080/02619760120095543.
   Google Scholar