143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Links between gender role attitudes and fertility changes between 1990–2017: Lithuania from a comparative perspective

References

  • Aidukaitė, J., N. Bogdanova, and A. Guogis. 2012. Gerovės valstybės kūrimas Lietuvoje: mitas ar realybė?Vilnius: Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras.
  • Andre, S., M. Gesthuizen, and P. Scheepers. 2013. “Support for Traditional Female Roles Across 32 Countries: Female Labour Market Participation, Policy Models and Gender Differences.” Comparative Sociology 12 (4): 447–476. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341270.
  • Arpino, B., G. Esping-Andersen, and L. G. Pessin. 2015. “How Do Changes in Gender Role Attitudes Towards Female Employment Influence Fertility? A Macro-Level Analysis.” European Sociological Review 31 (3): 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv002.
  • Bagilhole, B. 2009. Understanding Equal Opportunities and Diversity: The Social Differentiations and Intersections of Inequality. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Bernhardt, E. M., F. Goldscheider, and I. Turunen. 2016. “Attitudes to the Gender Division of Labor and the Transition to Fatherhood: Are Egalitarian Men in Sweden More Likely to Remain Childless?” Acta Sociologica 59 (3): 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699316645930.
  • Berrington, A., Y. Hu, P. W. Smith, and P. Sturgis. 2008. “A Graphical Chain Model for Reciprocal Relationships Between Women’s Gender Role Attitudes and Labour Force Participation.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 171 (1): 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00510.x.
  • Bolzendahl, C. I., and D. J. Myers. 2004. “Feminist Attitudes and Support for Gender Equality: Opinion Change in Women and Men, 1974–1998.” Social Forces 83 (2): 759–789. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0005.
  • Brinton, M., and D. Lee. 2016. “Gender–Role Ideology, Labor Market Institutions, and Post–Industrial Fertility.” Population and Development Review 42 (3): 405–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.161.
  • Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung. 2008. Population Policy Acceptance Study (PPAS). Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA4653 Data file Version 1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.4653
  • Coleman, D. 2006. “Europe’s Demographic Future: Determinants, Dimensions, and Challenges.” Population and Development Review 32:52–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.tb00003.x. S1
  • Cunningham, M., A. M. Beutel, J. S. Barber, and A. Thornton. 2005. “Reciprocal Relationships Between Attitudes About Gender and Social Contexts During Young Adulthood.” Social Science Research 34 (4): 862–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.03.001.
  • Davis, S. N., and T. N. Greenstein. 2009. “Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Sociology 35 (1): 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G., and F. Billari. 2015. “Re-Theorizing Family Demography.” Population and Development Review 41 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x.
  • European Institute for Gender Equality. 2020. Gender Equality Index 2020: Digitalisation and Future of Work. Accessed June 20, 2021. https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mhaf20001enn_002.pdf.
  • Eurostat. 2021a. “Employment and Activity by Sex and Age [Lfsi_emp_a]”. Accessed July 12, 2021. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/lfsi_emp_a.
  • Eurostat. 2021b. “Population by Educational Attainment Level, Sex and Age [Edat_lfse_03]”. Accessed July 12, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/edat_lfse_03.
  • EVS. 2011a. EVS - European Values Study 1990 - Integrated Dataset. Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA4460 Data file Version 3.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10790
  • EVS. 2011b. EVS - European Values Study 1999 - Integrated Dataset. Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA3811 Data file Version 3.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.10789
  • EVS. 2016. European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008). Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA4800 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12458
  • EVS. 2020. European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA7500 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13560
  • Fenger, H. J. M. 2007. “Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology.” Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 3 (2): 1–30.
  • Frejka, T. 2010. “Cohort Overlays of Evolving Childbearing Patterns: How Postponement and Recuperation are Reflected in Period Fertility Trends.” MPIDR Working Paper WP-2010-026. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
  • Frejka, T., and S. Gietel-Basten. 2016. “Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe After 1990.” Comparative Population Studies 41 (1): 3–56. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03.
  • Frejka, T., and T. Sobotka. 2008. “Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe: Diverse, Delayed and Below Replacement.” Demographic Research 19:15–46. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.3.
  • Fux, B. 2008. “Pathways of Welfare and Population-Related Policies.” In People, Population Change and Policies: Lessons from the Population Policy Acceptance Study, C. Hohn, D. Avramov, and I. E. Kotowska edited by, Vol. 1 59–90.Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6609-2_4.
  • Goldscheider, F., L. Olah, and A. Puur. 2010. “Reconciling Studies of Men’s Gender Attitudes and Fertility: Response to Westoff & Higgins.” Demographic Research 22:189–198. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.22.8.
  • Goldscheider, F., and S. Sassler. 2018. “Family Policy, Socioeconomic Inequality, and the Gender Revolution.” In Unequal Family Lives: Causes and Consequences in Europe and the Americas, edited by N. R. Cahn, J. C. Arbone, L. F. DeRose, and W. B. Wilcox, 199–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldsheider, F., E. Bernhardt, and T. Lappegard. 2015. “The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior.” Population and Development Review 41 (2): 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x.
  • Grunow, D., K. Begall, and S. Buchler. 2018. “Gender Ideologies in Europe: A Multidimensional Framework.” Journal of Marriage and Family 80 (1): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12453.
  • Hudde, A., and H. Engelhardt. 2020. “Intra-Couple (Dis)similarity in Gender Role Attitudes and the Transition to Parenthood in Germany.” European Sociological Review 36 (6): 852–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa024.
  • Human Fertility Database. 2021. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Accessed July 17, 2021. www.humanfertility.org.
  • ISSP Research Group. 2016. International Social Survey Programme: Family and Changing Gender Roles IV - ISSP 2012. Cologne:GESIS Data Archive. ZA5900 Data file Version 4.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.12661
  • Kaufman, G., E. Bernhardt, and F. Goldscheider. 2017. “Enduring Egalitarianism? Family Transitions and Attitudes Toward Gender Equality in Sweden.” Journal of Family Issues 38 (13): 1878–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16632266.
  • Knight, C. R., and M. C. Brinton. 2017. “One Egalitarianism or Several? Two Decades of Gender-Role Attitude Change in Europe.” American Journal of Sociology 122 (5): 1485–1532. https://doi.org/10.1086/689814.
  • Leitner, S. 2014. “Varieties of Familialism: Developing Care Policies in Conservative Welfare States.” In The End of Welfare as We Know It? Continuity and Change in Western Welfare State Settings and Practices, edited by P. Sandermann, 37–51. Opladen: Budrich. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvddzzk8.5.
  • Lesthaeghe, R., and G. Moors. 2002. “Life Course Transitions and Value Orientations: Selection and Adaptation.” In Meaning and Choice: Value Orientations and Life Course Decisions, edited by R. Lesthaeghe, 1–44. The Hague: NIDI.
  • Lobodzinska, B. 1996. “Women’s Employment or Return to ‘Family values’ in Central-Eastern Europe.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 27 (3): 519–544. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.27.3.519.
  • Lohmann, H., and H. Zagel. 2016. “Family Policy in Comparative Perspective: The Concepts and Measurement of Familization and Defamilization.” Journal of European Social Policy 26 (1): 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715621712.
  • Lomazzi, V., S. Israel, and I. Crespi. 2019. “Gender Equality in Europe and the Effect of Work–Family Balance Policies on Gender-Role Attitudes.” Social Science 8 (1): 1–29.
  • McDonald, P. 2000a. “Gender Equity in Theories of Fertility Transition.” Population and Development Review 26 (3): 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00427.x.
  • McDonald, P. 2000b. “Gender Equity, Social Institutions and the Future of Fertility.” Journal of the Australian Population Association 17 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03029445.
  • McDonald, P. 2013. “Societal Foundations for Exampling Fertility: Gender Equity.” Demographic Research 28:981–994. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34.
  • Mills, M. 2010. “Gender Roles, Gender (In)equality and Fertility: An Empirical Test of Five Gender Equity Indices.” Canadian Studies in Population 37 (3–4): 445–474. https://doi.org/10.25336/P6131Q.
  • Neyer, G., T. Lappegard, and D. Vignoli. 2013. “Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters?” European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie 29 (3): 245–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7.
  • Nordic Council of Ministers. 2020. State of the Nordic Region 2020. Accessed January 22, 2021 https://pub.norden.org/nord2020-001/nord2020-001.pdf.
  • Panova, R., and I. Buber-Ennser. 2016. “Attitudes Towards Parental Employment: A Ranking Across Europe, Australia, and Japan.” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6 (2): 11–37.
  • Pitt, R. N., and E. Borland. 2008. “Bachelorhood and Men’s Attitudes About Gender Roles.” The Journal of Men’s Studies 16 (2): 140–158. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1602.140.
  • Poortman, A. R., and T. Van Der Lippe. 2009. “Attitudes Towards Housework and Child Care and the Gendered Division of Labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family 71 (3): 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00617.x.
  • Puur, A., L. Olah, M. Tazi-Preve, and J. Dorbritz. 2008. “Men’s Childbearing Desires and Views of the Male Role in Europe at the Dawn of the 21st Century.” Demographic Research 19:1883–1912. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.56.
  • Research Group, I. S. S. P. 1997. International Social Survey Programme: Family and Changing Gender Roles II - ISSP 1994. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. ZA2620 Data file Version 1.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.2620.
  • Saxonberg, S., and D. Szelewa. 2007. “The Continuing Legacy of the Communist Legacy? The Development of Family Policies in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Social Politics 14 (3): 351–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm014.
  • Scarborough, W. J., R. Sin, and B. Risman. 2019. “Attitudes and the Stalled Gender Revolution: Egalitarianism, Traditionalism, and Ambivalence from 1977 Through 2016.” Gender & Society 33 (2): 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604.
  • Schober, P. S., and J. Scott. 2012. “Maternal Employment and Gender Role Attitudes: Dissonance Among British Men and Women in the Transition to Parenthood.” Work, Employment & Society 26 (3): 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012438577.
  • Sobotka, T. 2011. “Fertility in Central and Eastern Europe After 1989: Collapse and Gradual Recovery.” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 36 (2:136): 246–296.
  • Statistics Lithuania. 2021. “Total Fertility Rate.” Accessed July 20, 2021. https://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize?hash=7774ef36-415a-4d9e-9eee-a4fa9e2ca457.
  • United Nations. 2020. World Fertility and Family Planning 2020. New York: United Nations.
  • Westoff, C. F., and J. Higgins. 2009. ““Relationships Between Men’s Gender Attitudes and Fertility: Response to Puur Et al.’s ‘Men’s Childbearing Desires and Views of the Male Role in Europe at the Dawn of the 21st century.”.” Demographic Research 21:65–74. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.21.3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.