The United States and the entry of the Baltic states into international society: insights from the case of Estonia

References

• Agné, H., J. Bartelson, E. Erman, T. Lindemann, B. Herborth, O. Kessler, C. Chwaszcza, M. Fabry, and S. D. Krasner. 2013. “Symposium ‘The Politics of International Recognition’.” International Theory 5 (1): 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971913000018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arens, O. 2016. “United States Policy Toward Estonia and the Baltic States 1918–1920 and 1989–1991.” Ajalooline Ajakiri 3 (4): 347–368. https://doi.org/10.12697/AA.2016.3-4.02.
   Google Scholar
• Arens, O. 2022. “Wilsonianism ilma Wilsonita: Ameerika Ühendriigid ja Eesti, 1918–1922.” In Ameerika sajand, edited by K. Piirimäe and M. Kuldkepp, 19–44. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D. 1993. Revolution and World Order. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. 2013. “Three Concepts of Recognition.” International Theory 5 (1): 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191300002X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmane, U. 2022. “USA ja Balti küsimus külma saja lõpus.” In Ameerika sajand, edited by K. Piirimäe and M. Kuldkepp, 188–210. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. [1977] 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1980. “The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World Order.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 35 (3): 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070208003500302.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1984. “The Emergence of a Universal International Society.” In The Expansion of International Society, edited by H. Bull and A. Watson, 117–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H., and A. Watson, eds. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2014a. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2014b. “The ‘Standard of Civilisation’ As an English School Concept.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 42 (3): 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814528265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2020. “Three Ideas for Taking the English School Forward.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (4): 499–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1785132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., and L. Schouenborg. 2018. Global International Society: A New Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., and Y. Zhang. 2014. “Introduction: Interrogating Regional International Society in East Asia.” In Contesting International Society in East Asia, edited by B. Buzan and Y. Zhang, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T., I. Manners, and R. G. Whitman. 2011. “The Changing Nature of International Institutions in Europe: The Challenge of the European Union.” Journal of European Integration 33 (2): 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2011.543522.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. 1998. “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?” International Affairs 74 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, T., and C. Reus-Smit, eds. 2017. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F., ed. 2017. Memories of Empire and Entry into International Society: Views from the European Periphery. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, M. 2010. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States Since 1776. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, G. W. 1984. The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hiden, J., V. Made, and D. J. Smith, eds. 2008. The Baltic Question During the Cold War. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, K. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klymenko, L., and M. Siddi. 2020. “Exploring the Link Between Historical Memory and Foreign Policy: An Introduction.” International Politics 57 (6): 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00269-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehti, M. 2007. “Protégé or Go-Between? The Role of the Baltic States After 9/11 in EU–US Relations.” Journal of Baltic Studies 38 (2): 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770701345065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, A., and H. Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linsenmaier, T. 2018. “World Society as Collective Identity: World Society, International Society, and Inclusion/Exclusion from Europe.” International Politics 55 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0066-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Made, V. 2000. Külalisena maailmapoliitikas: Eesti ja Rahvasteliit 1919-1946. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2010. The Politics of Becoming European: A Study of Polish and Baltic Post-Cold War Security Imaginaries. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayall, J. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medijainen, E. 2008. “The USA, Soviet Russia and the Baltic States: From Recognition to the Cold War.” In The Baltic Question During the Cold War, edited by J. Hiden, V. Made, and D. J. Smith, 21–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medijainen, E. 2018. “Enesemääramine, Wilson ja Eesti.” Diplomaatia 173/174 (1/2): 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Medijainen, E. 2022. “The United States and Estonia, 1918-1921: Approval de Facto Before Recognition.” Acta Historica Tallinnensia 28 (2): 235–264. https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2022.2.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2011. “Entry into International Society Reconceptualised: The Case of Russia.” Review of International Studies 37 (2): 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearcey, M. 2015. “Sovereignty, Identity, and Indigenous-State Relations at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century: A Case of Exclusion by Inclusion.” International Studies Review 17 (3): 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perchoc, P. 2013. “History As a Tool for Foreign Policy in the Baltic States After Independence.” In History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by G. Mink and L. Neumayer, 242–256. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piirimäe, K. 2014. Roosevelt, Churchill, and the Baltic Question: Allied Relations During the Cold War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piirimäe, K., and H. H. Varbla. 2022. “Vene mõjusfäärist NATO kandidaadiks: Eesti julgeolekupoliitilised püüdlused G.H. Bushi ja W. Clintoni ajal.” InAmeerika sajand, edited by K. Piirimäe and M. Kuldkepp, 213–255. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Quayle, L. 2013. “Power and Paradox: Indonesia and the ‘English School’ Concept of Great Powers.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 13 (2): 301–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lct001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. 2011. “Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System.” International Organization 65 (2): 207–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818311000038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E. 2014. “Recognition and the Origins of International Society.” Global Discourse 4 (4): 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.917031.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, D., and V. Pungong, eds. 2000. The United States and Decolonization: Power and Freedom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schouenborg, L. 2011. “A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory.” International Relations 25 (1): 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117810396992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouenborg, L. 2012. “Exploring Westphalia’s Blind Spots: Exceptionalism Meets the English School.” Geopolitics 17 (1): 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2010.523096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohr Readman, K. 2008. “Between Political Rhetoric and Realpolitik Calculations: Western Diplomacy and the Baltic Independence Struggle in the Cold War Endgame.” In The Baltic Question During the Cold War, edited by J. Hiden, V. Made, and D. J. Smith, 156–188. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stivachtis, Y. A. 1998. The Enlargement of International Society: Culture versus Anarchy and Greece’s Entry into International Society. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suganami, H. 2002. “The International Society Perspective on World Politics Reconsidered.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 2 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/2.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Trapans, J. A. 1994. “The West and the Recognition of the Baltic States: 1919 and 1991; a Study of the Politics of the Major Powers.” Journal of Baltic Studies 25 (2): 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629779400000071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. 1991. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wivel, A., and M. Crandall. 2019. “Punching Above Their Weight, but Why? Explaining Denmark and Estonia in the Transatlantic Relationship.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 17 (3): 392–419. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-019-00020-2.
   Google Scholar