Finland and the Russian Duma

NOTES

• On Speransky's plans and Finland, See Korhonen Keijo Suomen asiain komitea. Suomen korkeimman hallinnon järjestelyt ja toteuttaminen vuosina 1811–1826 Das Komitee für die Angelegenheiten Finnlands Referat Organisation und Verwirklichung der höchsten Verwaltung Finnlands in den Jahren 1811–1826) (Helsinki, 1963), 15–20; on Loris Melikov and Finland, see for example Erkki K. Osmonsalo, “Perustuslaillisen kehityksen kausi,” Suomen historian käsikirja II (Porvoo-Helsinki, 1949), 232.
   Google Scholar
• See Raeff Marc Plans for Political Reform in Imperial Russia, 1730–1905 New Jersey 1966 93 109 132–140, and on Speransky's plans, M. M. Speranskii, Proekty i zapiski, ed. S. N. Valk (Moscow, 1961).
   Google Scholar
• Snellman , J.V. 1896 . Vägen till senaten. Samlade arbeten Vol. 9 , 421 – 421 . Helsingfors
   Google Scholar
• On Bulygin's plans concerning Finland, see Istoricheskaia zapiska o poriadke izdaniia kasaiushchikhsia Finliandii zakonov obshchegosudarstvennago znacheniia Materialy po zakonu 17. Iiunia 1910 g. o poriadke izdaniia kasaiushchikhsia Finliandii zakonov i postanovlenii obshchegosudarstvennago znacheniia St. Petersburg 76 78 in n.d.) hereafter cited as “Istoricheskaia zapiska.” On the February Manifesto, see Osmo Jussila, “The Historical Background of the February Manifesto of 1899,” Journal of Baltic Studies XV (1984): 141–47.
   Google Scholar
• See Bulygin's plan in Istoricheskaia zapiska
   Google Scholar
• The Manifesto is published for example in Kalinychev F.I. Gosudarstvennaia duma v Rossii Moscow 1957 30 31
   Google Scholar
• Files of the Finnish Senate, KD 369/54 and 397/57, year 1905; GgKb 34/5 and 119/15, year 1906; Minutes of the Economic Department of the Senate National Archives of Finland 1905 Sept. 13
   Google Scholar
• Nov. 1914 . Minutes of the Economic Department of the Senate Nov. , 24
   Google Scholar
• Kalinychev . 104 – 104 .
   Google Scholar
• Istoricheskaia zapiska 80 – 80 . note 1.
   Google Scholar
• On Solskii's Committee, see Istoricheskaia zapiska 80 84 Solskii's correspondence with Governor-General N. Gerhard and the Minister, State-Secretary A. Langhoff, is in the Archives of the Russian State Council, files 36–38, Fond 1162, TsGIAL (Soviet microfilm collection, reel 25, in the National Archives of Finland); some correspondence is also in the archives of the Governor-General, file 36, year 1906, IV Department. See also, “Materialy Vysochaishe uchrezhdennago, pod predsedatelstvom grafa D. M. Solskago, soveshchaniia dlia razrabotka neobkhodimykh v deistvuiushchem uchrezhdenii Gosudarstvennago Soveta izmenenii,” in Materialy otnosiashchiesia do proektov osnovnykh zakonov Velikago Kniazhestva Finliandskago, a takzhe po voprosu o poriadke izdaniia i obnarodovaniia zakonov, obshchikh dlia vsei Imperii, s vkliucheniem Velikago Kniazhestva Finliandskago, vol. 2 (St. Petersburg, n.d.), 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Durnovo to S. Iu. Witte, Materialy otn. 1906 Feb. 18 published in see note 13.
   Google Scholar
• Istoricheskaia zapiska 88 – 89 . the plan is published in extenso in Solskii's Committee material, 35–75 (see note 13).
   Google Scholar
• Istoricheskaia zapiska 89 – 91 . and other materials of Solskii's Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Istoricheskaia zapiska 91 – 91 .
   Google Scholar
• Langhoff's statement in the published material of Solskii's Committee 76 – 80 .
   Google Scholar
• Langhoff's telegram to Gerhard, in the file of the Governor-General's Office, No. 40, 1906, IV Department. In his memoris, Langhoff tells about this incident: “Because I was afraid that the Emperor would possibly confirm the draft for the Ukase before I could get a chance to explain its significance for Finland to him, I sent to him on 9 March a humble proposal about this [i.e. about postponement, O. Jussila], on which the Emperor wrote in his own hand, ‘I regard it necessary to postpone the decision of this issue for a while.’” Langhoff A. Sju år såsom Finlands representant inför tronen. Minnen och anteckningar åren 1906–1913 Helsingfors 1923 2 130 132
   Google Scholar
• On Kharitonov's Committee, see Materialy po zakonu 17. Iiunia 1910 g
   Google Scholar
• Compare the explanatory memorandum of the Russian majority in Kharitonov's Committee Materialy po zakonu 17. Iiunia 1910 g. 364 370 and Stolypin's proposal with specific arguments, 6–7, 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• See Kharitonov's Committee Materialy po zakonu 17. Iiunia 1910 g. 364 370 and Stolypin's proposal with specific arguments, 6–7, 69–74.
   Google Scholar