References
- AARP. (n.d.). The AARP network of age-friendly communities. Retrieved from http://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/network-age-friendly-communities
- Allen-Meares, P. G. (2017). Introduction to good neighborhoods. In P. G. Allen-Meares, T. R. Shanks, L. M. Gant, L. D. Hollingsworth, & P. L. Miller (Eds.), A twenty-first century approach to community change (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Alley, D., Liebig, P., Pynoos, J., Banerjee, T., & Choi, I. H. (2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1–2), 1–18. doi:10.1300/J083v49n01_01
- Bardbury, H., & Reason, P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 155–175. doi:10.1177/1473325003002002003
- Campbell, J. (2015). Guiding principles for the sustainability of age-friendly community efforts. Retrieved from https://www.giaging.org/documents/160107__Sustainability_Principles.pdf.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- Chee, K. H. (2006). Community mobilization in the context of population aging. Sociological Spectrum, 26(1), 43–61. doi:10.1080/02732170500368594
- Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Research, 2012, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2012/173247
- Filinson, R., Raimondo, M., & Maigret, M. (2016). Building age-friendly community: Notes from the field. Sociology between the Gaps: Forgotten and Neglected Topics, 2(1). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/sbg/vol2/iss1/10
- Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Gonyea, J. G., & Hudson, R. B. (2015). Emerging models of Age-friendly communities: A framework for understanding inclusion. Public Policy & Aging Report, 25(1), 9–14. doi:10.1093/ppar/pru056
- Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age-friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 191–198. doi:10.1093/geront/gnv005.
- Hill, K. M., Ferguson, S. M., & Erickson, C. (2010). Sustaining and strengthening a macro identity: The association of macro practice social work. Journal of Community Practice, 18, 513–527. doi:10.1080/10705422.2010.519684
- Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
- M4A. (n.d.). Elements for successfully creating aging friendly communities: Ten best practices. Retrieved from http://agefriendly.community/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/AFC-Fact-Sheet.pdf
- Menec, V. H. (2017). Conceptualizing social connectivity in the context of age-friendly communities. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 99–116. doi:10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926
- Menec, V. H., Newall, N. E., & Nowicki, S. (2016). Assessing communities’ age-friendliness: How congruent are subjective versus objective assessments? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(5), 549–565. doi:10.1177/0733464814542612
- Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2005). Improving health through community organization and community building: Perspectives from health education and social work. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health and welfare (3rd ed., pp. 37–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Neal, M. B., & Wernher, I. (2014). Evaluating your age-friendly community program: A step-by-step guide. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1012&context=aging_pub
- NYAM. (2007). Toward an age-friendly New York City: A findings report. Retrieved from https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/aids/providers/conferences/docs/nyam_age_friendly_report.pdf
- Ohmer, M. L., & Korr, W. S. (2016). The effectiveness of community practice interventions: A review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice. doi:10.1177/1049731505282204
- Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- PHAC. (2015). Age-friendly communities evaluation guide: Using indicators to measure progress. Retrieved from http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/seniors-aines/alt-formats/pdf/indicators-indicateurs-v2-eng.pdf
- Plouffe, L. A., & Kalache, A. (2011). Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries. Gaceta Sanitaria, 25(Suppl. 2), 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.11.001
- Putnam, M. (2016). Beginning of a series on neighborhoods and communities: Aging in non-traditional housing. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 59(6), 439–440. doi:10.1080/01634372.2016.1259404
- Rothman, J. (2001). Approaches to community intervention. In J. Rothman, J. L. Erlich, & J. E. Tropman (Eds.), Strategies of Community Intervention (6th ed., pp. 27-64). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
- Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating Age-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37(1), 25–38. doi:10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1
- Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2013). Ageing-friendly communities and social inclusion in the United States of America. Ageing & Society, 33(1), 110–136. doi:10.1017/S0144686X1200578
- Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2016). Creating Age-friendly communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- W.K. Kellogg Foundation, (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. Retrieved from https://www.wkkf.org/resource-directory/resource/2006/02/wk-kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide
- Weil, M., Gamble, D. N., & Ohmer, M. L. (2013). Evolution, models, and the changing context of community practice. In M. Weil, M. Reisch, & M. L. Ohmer (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (2nd ed., pp. 167–193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Weiss, C. H. (1997). Evaluation research: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
- WHO. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
- WHO. (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/203830/1/9789241509695_eng.pdf
- WHO. (n.d. [a]). Age-friendly world. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld
- WHO. (n.d. [b]). Network cycle of continual improvement. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/age_friendly_cities_process/en/