287
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Potato Consumption and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Cohort

, , , &
Pages 564-572 | Received 15 Feb 2016, Accepted 09 Dec 2016, Published online: 21 Mar 2017

References

  • Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, et al.: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 127, 2893–2917, 2010. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25516.
  • Cancer Registry of Norway: Cancer in Norway 2012. Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, 2014.
  • Zaheer K, and Akhtar MH: Recent advances in potato production, usage, nutrition—a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56, 711–721, 2014. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.724479.
  • Wandel M, Fagerli R, and Kjærnes U: Changes in potato consumption in different stages of life in Norway. Appetite 36, 211–223, 2001. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.2001.0396.
  • Wandel M, Bugge A, and Ramm JS: Matvaner i endring og stabilitet: en studie av måltidsvaner og matforbruk i ulike forbrukergrupper. [Changes and stability in food habits: a study of meal habits and food consumption in different consumption groups]. National Institute for Consumer Research. Norwegian, Oslo, 1995.
  • Camire ME, Kubow S, and Donnelly DJ: Potatoes and human health. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 49, 823–840, 2009. doi: 10.1080/10408390903041996.
  • McGill CR, Kurilich AC, and Davignon J: The role of potatoes and potato components in cardiometabolic health: A review. Ann Med 45, 467–473, 2013. doi:10.3109/07853890.2013.813633.
  • Borgi L, Rimm EB, Willett WC, and Forman JP: Potato intake and incidence of hypertension: results from three prospective US cohort studies. BMJ 353, i2351, 2016.
  • Muraki I, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Manson JE, Hu FB, et al.: Potato consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from three prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Care 39, 376–384, 2016.
  • Steinmetz KA, and Potter JD: Food-group consumption and colon cancer in the adelaide case-control study. I. Vegetables and fruit. Int J Cancer 53,711–719, 1993. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530502.
  • De Stefani E, Correa P, Boffetta P, Deneo-Pellegrini H, Ronco LA, et al.: Dietary patterns and risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay. Gastric Cancer 7, 211–220, 2004.
  • Williams CD, Satia JA, Adair LS, Stevens J, Galanko J, et al.: Dietary patterns, food groups, and rectal cancer risk in Whites and African Americans. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18, 1552–1561, 2009.
  • Deneo-Pellegrini H, Boffetta P, De Stefani E, Ronco A, Brennan P, et al.: Plant foods and differences between colon and rectal cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev 11, 369–375, 2002.
  • Hansen L, Skeie G, Landberg R, Lund E, Palmqvist R, et al.: Intake of dietary fiber, especially from cereal foods, is associated with lower incidence of colon cancer in the HELGA cohort. Int J Cancer 131, 469–478, 2012.
  • Totland TH, Melnes BK, Lundberg-Hallén N, and Helland-Kigen KM: Norkost 3. En landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant menn og kvinner i Norge i alderen 18–70 år, 2010-11 (Nationwide dietary survey in Norway among men and women aged 18–70 years, 2010-11). University of Oslo, Norwegian Food Safety Authority, Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, 2012.
  • World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research: Continuous update project report. Colorectal cancer 2011 report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of CRC. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC, 2011.
  • Ludwig DS: The glycemic index: Physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287, 2414–2423, 2002. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2414.
  • van Bakel MME, Kaaks R, Feskens EJM, and Rohrmann S: Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 188–205, 2009.
  • Wirfält E, McTaggart A, Pala V, Gullberg B, Frasca G, et al.: Food sources of carbohydrates in a European cohort of adults. Public Health Nutr 5, 1197–1215, 2002.
  • American Diabetes Association: Glycemic index and diabetes. Version current 14 May 2014. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/food/what-can-i-eat/understanding-carbohydrates/glycemic-index-and-diabetes.html?referrer=https://www.google.no/%20-%20sthash.bvC8wza4.dpuf (accessed 4 June 2015).
  • Barclay AW, Petocz P, McMillan-Price J, Flood VM, Prvan T, et al.: Glycemic index, glycemic load, and chronic disease risk—a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 627–637, 2008.
  • Sieri S, Krogh V, Agnoli C, Ricceri F, Palli D, et al.: Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load and risk of colorectal cancer: results from the EPIC-Italy study. Int J Cancer 136, 2923–2931, 2015. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29341.
  • Hu J, La Vecchia C, Augustin LS, Negri E, de Groh M, et al.: Glycemic index, glycemic load and cancer risk. Ann Oncol 24, 245–251, 2013. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds235.
  • Turati F, Galeone C, Gandini S, Augustin LS, Jenkins DJA, et al.: High glycemic index and glycemic load are associated with moderately increased cancer risk. Mol Nutr Food Res 59, 1384–1394, 2015. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400594.
  • Miller PE, Lesko SM, Muscat JE, Lazarus P, and Hartman TJ: Dietary patterns and colorectal adenoma and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr Cancer 62, 413–424, 2010. doi: 10.1080/01635580903407114.
  • Afzaninawati Y, Zaleha MI, and Shah SA: Dietary patterns and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of cohort studies (2000–2011). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13, 4713–4717, 2012.
  • Randi G, Edefonti V, Ferraroni M, La Vecchia C, and Decarli A: Dietary patterns and the risk of colorectal cancer and adenomas. Nutr Rev 68, 389–408, 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00299.x.
  • Mottram DS, Wedzicha BL, and Dodson AT: Food chemistry: acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction. Nature 419, 448–449, 2002.
  • Stadler RH, Blank I, Varga N, Robert F, Hau J, et al.: Food chemistry: acrylamide from Maillard reaction products. Nature 419, 449–450, 2002.
  • IARC: IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 60: Some industrial chenmicals. IARC, Lyon, 1994.
  • Lipworth L, Sonderman JS, Tarone RE, and McLaughlin JK: Review of epidemiologic studies of dietary acrylamide intake and the risk of cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 21, 375–386, 2012. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e3283529b64.
  • European Food Safety Authority: Outcome of the public consultation on the draft Scientific Opinion of the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) on acrylamide in food. EFSA supporting publication 2015:EN-817. European Food Safety Authority, Parma, 2015.
  • National Association for Nutrition and Health: Mål og vekt for matvarer. 2 ed. [Weights and measures table for foods. 2nd ed.] National Association for Nutrition and Health. Norwegian, Oslo, 1995.
  • National Nutrition Council, National Food Control Authorities, Institute for Nutrition Research University of Oslo: Den Store Matvaretabellen. 2 ed. [The Big Food Composition Table. 2nd ed]. Gyldendal Agency, Oslo, 2001.
  • Skeie G, Hjartaker A, and Lund E: Diet among breast cancer survivors and healthy women. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 1046–1054, 2006.
  • Lund E, Dumeaux V, Braaten T, Hjartåker A, Engeset D, et al.: Cohort profile: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study—NOWAC—Kvinner og kreft. Int J Epidemiol 37, 36–41, 2008. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym137.
  • Lund E, Kumle M, Braaten T, Hjartåker A, Bakken K, et al.: External validity in a population-based national prospective study: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Cancer Causes Control 14, 1001–1008, 2003. doi: 10.2307/3554008.
  • Hjartåker A: Comparison of diet measures from a food-frequency questionnaire with measures from repeated 24-hour dietary recalls. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Public Health Nutr 10, 1094–1103, 2007.
  • Parr C, Veierod M, Laake P, Lund E, and Hjartaker A: Test-retest reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and estimated effects on disease risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Nutr J 5, 4, 2006.
  • Borch K, Ekelund U, Brage S, and Lund E: Criterion validity of a 10-category scale for ranking physical activity in Norwegian women. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9, 2, 2012.
  • Skeie G, Mode N, Henningsen M, and Borch K: Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Clin Epidemiol 7, 313–323, 2015. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S83839.
  • Slimani N, Kaaks R, Ferrari P, Casagrande C, Clavel-Chapelon F, et al.: European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr 5, 1125–1145, 2002.
  • National Cancer Institute: NCI dictionary of cancer terms. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms?CdrID=306510 ( accessed 22 May 2015).
  • McCarl M, Harnack L, Limburg PJ, Anderson KE, and Folsom AR: Incidence of colorectal cancer in relation to glycemic index and load in a cohort of women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15, 892–896, 2006.
  • Michaud DS, Fuchs CS, Liu S, Willett WC, Colditz GA, et al.: Dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate, sugar, and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14, 138–147, 2005.
  • Li F-y, and Lai M-d: Colorectal cancer, one entity or three. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 10, 219–229, 2009.doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820273.
  • Åsli LA, Braaten T, Olsen A, Lund E, and Skeie G: What characterises women who eat potatoes? A cross-sectional study among 74,208 women in the Norwegian Women and Cancer cohort. Food Nutr Res 59, 25703, 2015. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v59.25703.
  • Norwegian Directorate of Health: Utviklingen i norsk kosthold (Trends in the Norwegian diet). Norwegian Directorate of Health. Norwegian, Oslo, 2011.
  • Agriculture Marketing Resource Center: Potato profile. Available at: http://agmrc.org/commodities__products/vegetables/potato-profile/( accessed 25 June 2015).
  • Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, and Gorber B: A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 8, 307–326, 2007.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.