Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction

REFERENCES

• Aijmer , K. 2007 . “ The interface between discourse and grammar: “The fact is that.” . In Connectives as discourse landmarks , Edited by: Celle , A. and Huart , R. 31 – 46 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. (1998). Zwischen Parataxe und Hypotaxe: “Abhängige Hauptsätze” im gesprochenen und geschriebenen deutsch. [Between parataxis and hypotaxis: Dependent main clauses in spoken and written German]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 284–307.
   Google Scholar
• Auer , P. 2000 . “ Pre- and postpositioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German. ” . In Cause–condition–concession–contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspectives , Edited by: Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Kortmann , B. 173 – 204 . Berlin : de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Auer , P. 2005a . “ Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex turns in conversation. ” . In Syntax and lexis in conversation , Edited by: Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. 75 – 102 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Auer , P. 2005b . Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. . Text , 25 : 7 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Auer , P. 2006 . “ Construction grammar meets conversation: Einige Überlegungen am Beispiel von “so”-Konstruktionen. ” . In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion , Edited by: Günthner , S. and Wolfgang , I. 291 – 314 . Berlin : de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Auer , P. 2009 . On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. . Language Sciences , 31 : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkner , K. 2008 . Relativsatzkonstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch: Syntaktische, prosodische, semantische und pragmatische Aspekte. [Relative sentence constructions in spoken German: Syntactic, prosodic, semantic and pragmatic aspects]. , Tübingen, , Germany : Niemeyer .
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen , E. and Thompson , S. 2008 . Assessing situations and events in conversation: “Extraposition” and its relatives . Discourse Studies , 10 : 443 – 467 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel , H. and Tomasello , M. 2001 . The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. . Cognitive Linguistics , 11 : 131 – 151 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg , P. 1999 . Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Vol. 2, [Fundamentals of German grammar]. , Stuttgart, , Germany : Metzler .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , C. 1996 . “ Transparent vision. ” . In Interaction and grammar , Edited by: Ochs , E. , Schegloff , E. and Thompson , S. 370 – 404 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Günthner , S. 1999 . Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache. [Wenn-sentences in the pre-frontfield: Forms and functions in spoken language]. . Deutsche Sprache , 3 : 209 – 235 .
   Google Scholar
• Günthner , S. 2005 . “ Grammatical constructions in “real life practices.” Wo-constructions in everyday German. ” . In Syntax and lexic in conversation. Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction , Edited by: Hakulinen , A. and Selting , M. 159 – 184 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Günthner , S. 2006 . “ Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust: Pseudocleft-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch. [Was ihn trieb, war vor allem Wanderlust? Pseudocleft constructions in spoken German]. ” . In Konstruktionen in der Interaktion , Edited by: Günthner , S. and Imo , W. 59 – 89 . Berlin : de Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Günthner, S. (2007). N-be-that-constructions in everyday German conversation: A reanalysis of ‘die Sache ist’ (‘the thing is’)-clauses as projector phrases. Retrieved from GIDI-Working Paper, at http://noam.uni-meunster.de/gidi/
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi , M. 2004 . Projection and grammar: Notes on the “action-projecting” use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. . Journal of Pragmatics , 36 : 1337 – 1374 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada , L. 2006 . Participants' online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. . Discourse Studies , 8 : 117 – 129 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff , E. 2007 . Sequence organization in interaction. , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Selting , M. 1998 . Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem [Conversation analytic transcription system]. . Linguistische Berichte , 34 : 91 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Streeck , J. 1995 . “ On projection. ” . In Social intelligence and interaction , Edited by: Goody , E. N. 87 – 110 . Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka , H. 2000 . Turn-projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 33 : 1 – 38 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , S. A. 2002 . “Object complements” and conversation toward a realistic account. . Studies in Language , 26 : 126 – 163 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , S. A. and Mulac , A. 1991 . “ A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. ” . In Approaches to grammaticalization , Edited by: Traugott , E. C. and Heine , B. Vol. 2 , 313 – 330 . Amsterdam : Benjamins .
   Google Scholar