Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences: Evidence From Three Languages

References

• Baker, C. (1977). Regulators and turn-taking in American Sign Language discourse. In L. Friedman (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 215–236). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B., Mandelbaum, J., & Wilkinson, S. (2012). Pursuing a response by repairing an indexical reference. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45, 137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2005). Coordinating with each other in a material world. Discourse Studies, 7, 507–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1987). Collaborating on contributions to conversations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dachkovsky, S., & Sandler, W. (2009). Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech, 52, 287–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, C., Torreira, F., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00268.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, C., van der Kooij, E., & Crasborn, O. (2009). Mixed signals: Combining linguistic and affective functions of eyebrows in questions in sign language of the Netherlands. Language and Speech, 52, 315–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., & Floyd, S. (2014). Conversation across cultures. In N. J. Enfield, P. Kockelman, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 447–480). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Kendrick, K. H., & Enfield, N. J. (in press). A coding scheme for other-initiated repair across languages. Open Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is “huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE, 8, e78273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, M. M. (1996). Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the german repair initiator bitte? Language in Society, 25, 587–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1979). About brow: Emotional and conversational signals. In M. von Cranach, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline (pp. 169–202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., Dingemanse, M., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Brown, P., Dirksmeyer, T., & … Torreira, F. (2013). Huh? What? A first survey in 21 languages. In M. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp. 343–380). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1722–1741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2006). Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction. Oxford, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–448; discussion 448–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flecha-García, M. L. (2010). Eyebrow raises in dialogue and their relation to discourse structure, utterance function and pitch accents in English. Speech Communication, 52, 542–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2014). Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J. (Eds.). (2013). Conversational repair and human understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. (2010). From archive to corpus: Transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15, 106–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S. (1990). The temporal relationship between gesture and speech: A study of Japanese-English bilinguals. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Kita, S., Gijn, I. van, & Hulst, H. van der (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In I. Wachsmuth & M. Fröhlich (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K., & Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 1064, 195–277.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2014). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67, 34–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique, E. (in press). Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Manrique, E. (2011, May). Other-repair initiators in Argentine Sign Language: Handling seeing and understanding difficulties in face-to-face interaction. Unpublished master's thesis. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8, 117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9, 194–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park-Doob, M. A. (2010). Gesturing through time: Holds and intermodal timing in the stream of speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Pursuing a response. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 152–163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, G. (2014). Inclined to better understanding—The coordination of talk and “leaning forward” in doing repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Unpublished doctral dissertation. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28–52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Body torque. Social Research, 65, 535–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
   Google Scholar
• Sikveland, R. O., & Ogden, R. A. (2012). Holding gestures across turns: Moments to generate shared understanding. Gesture, 12, 167–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., & … Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10587–10592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svennevig, J. (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Retrieved from http://tla.mpi.nl/tools/tla-tools/elan/.
   Google Scholar
• Zeshan, U. (2004). Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language, 80, 7–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar