Coherence Threshold and the Continuity of Processing: The RI-Val Model of Comprehension

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1991). Effects of centrality on retrieval of text-based concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 932–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E. (2014). Processing anomalous anaphors. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1171–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based text processing view. Discourse Processes, 26, 109–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Myers, J. L. (2004). Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 268–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effects of antecedent typicality and distance. Language and Speech, 33, 103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. J. (2012). Eye movements reveal rapid concurrent access to factual and counterfactual interpretations of the world. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 939–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2008). Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds: An eye-movement investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 609–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. J., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Brain Research, 1236, 113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The “good enough” approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., McCarthy, K. S., & Burkett, C. (2014). Interpretive inferences in literature. In E. J. O'Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 386–415). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guéraud, S., Harmon, M. E., & Peracchi, K. A. (2005). Updating situation models: The memory-based contribution. Discourse Processes, 39, 243–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán, A. E., & Klin, C. M. (2000). Maintaining global coherence in reading: The role of sentence boundaries. Memory & Cognition, 28, 722–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala, C. M., & O'Brien, E. J. (1995). Strategies for resolving coherence breaks in reading. Discourse Processes, 20, 167–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., Horton, W. S., Jenkins, R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: Plausibility effects on memory for misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42, 305–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2014). Does validation during language comprehension depend on an evaluative mindset? Discourse Processes, 51, 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacovina, M. E., Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Fool me twice: The consequences of reading (and rereading) inaccurate information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 558–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyona, J. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40, 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamas, E. N., & Reder, L. M. (1995). The role of familiarity in cognitive processing. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 177–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kamas, E. N., Reder, I. M., & Ayers, M. S. (1996). Partial matching in the Moses illusion: Response bias not sensitivity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 687–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P. (2014). Validation and integration: An integrated overview. Discourse Processes, 51, 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 854–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Walsh, E. K., Smith, E. R., & O'Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge revision processes in refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 51, 374–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 778–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & Zhao, Q. (2008). The impact of strategy instruction and timing of estimates on low and high working-memory capacity readers' absolute monitoring accuracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Lea, R. B. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the” search after meaning” principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., & Goldman, S. R. (2015). Comprehension of short stories: Effects of task instructions on literary interpretation. Discourse Processes, 52, 585–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, L., Liu, H. L., Jin, H., Ng, Y. B., & Lin, C. (2006). Passive reactivation of background information from long-term memory during reading. NeuroReport, 17, 1887–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. D., & Engle, R. (2005). Accessing situation model information: Memory-based processing versus here-and-now accounts. Journal of Psychology, 139, 261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., Cook, A. E., Kambe, G., Mason, R. A., & O'Brien, E. J. (2000). Semantic and episodic effects on bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 29, 179–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26, 131–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., O'Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., & Mason, R. A. (1994). Maintaining global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 876–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., & Martin, A. E. (2012). If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension. Cognition, 122, 102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. ( in press). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65)
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2015). Models of discourse comprehension. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), Handbook on reading (pp. 217–231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2010). Accessibility of outdated information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Peracchi, K. A. (2004). Updating situation models: A reply to Zwaan and Madden. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 289–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N. (2008). How do readers handle incorrect information during reading? Memory & Cognition, 36, 688–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Kohlhepp, K., & Ryskin, R. A. (2014). Reducing reliance on inaccurate information. Memory & Cognition, 42, 11–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., & Horton, W. S. (2014). Amazing stories: Acquiring and avoiding inaccurate information from fiction. Discourse Processes, 51, 50–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 385–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52, 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (1996). Accessing global causes during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1208–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzella, M. L., & O'Brien, E. J. (2002). Retrieval of concepts in script-based texts and narratives: The influence of general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 780–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J. (2002). Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language, 17, 188–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 235–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Doering, J. C. (2014). Exploring individual differences in language validation. Discourse Processes, 51, 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers' goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M. G., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar