Cumulative Repetition Effects Across Multiple Readings of a Word: Evidence From Eye Movements

References

• Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2013). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, M. F., Hale, J., Kliegl, R., Patil, U., & Vasishth, S. (2008). Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the potsdam sentence corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, M. F., Hale, J. T., Vasishth, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallelism and syntactic processes in reading difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 301–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 83–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr, T. H., Brown, J. S., & Charalambous, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberland, C., Saint-Aubin, J., & Legere, M. A. (2013). The impact of text repetition on content and function words during reading: further evidence from eye movements. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, and R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, (pp. 341–371). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. (2002). The eyelink toolbox: eye tracking with matlab and the psychophysics toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 613–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084, 89–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demberg, V., & Keller, F. (2008). Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109, 193–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641–655.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, G., Shalom, D. E., Kliegl, R., & Sigman, M. (2014). Eye movements during reading proverbs and regular sentences: the incoming word predictability effect. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29, 260–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay, J. M., & Walker, R. (1999). A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 661–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, D., & Müller, H. (1983). On the relationship of saccade size and fixation duration in reading. In R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological functions: International views (pp. 287–302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Niemi, P. (1990). Eye movements during repeated reading of a text. Acta Psychol (Amst), 73, 259–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, F., & Lapata, M. (2003). Using the web to obtain frequencies for unseen bigrams. Computational Linguistics, 29, 459–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychon Bull Rev, 13, 668–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. J Exp Psychol Gen, 135, 12–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Dambacher, M., Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2010). The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading. Q J Exp Psychol A, 63, 1838–1857.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legge, G. E., Pelli, D. G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, B. (2001). Text processing: Memory representations mediate fluent reading. In M. Neveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, and H. L. Roediger, III (Eds.), Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honour of Fergus Craik (pp. 83–97). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. A., & Burns, K. I. (1990). Reprocessing text: Contributions from conceptually driven processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logacev, P., & Vasishth, S. (2013). em2: A package for computing reading time measures for psycholinguistics. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/Archive/em2/.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14, 648–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., Raney, G. E., Albrecht, J. E., & Rayner, K. (1997). Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors. Discourse Processes, 23, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, J. K. Y., & Kliegl, R. (2008). Conditional co-occurrence probability acts like frequency in predicting fixation durations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padró, L., & Stanilovsky, E. (2012). Freeling 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In N. C. C. Chair, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. Dogan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012). ELRA, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 2473–2479.
   Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., & Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7, 20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., New, B., & Kennedy, A. (2008a). A multiple regression analysis of syntactic and semantic influences in reading normal text. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynte, J., New, B., & Kennedy, A. (2008b). On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: a multiple-regression analysis. Vision Res, 48, 2172–2183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, G., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2000). Repetition effects from paraphrased text: Evidence for an integrated representation model of text representation. Discourse Processes, 29, 61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, G. E. (2003). A context-dependent representation model for explaining text repetition effects. Psychon Bull Rev, 10, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, G. E., & Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Can J Exp Psychol, 49, 151–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Raney, G. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1995). Eye movements and discourse processing. In R. Lorch & E. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 9–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, Y., Ishiguro, M., & Kitagawa, G. (1986). Akaike information criterion statistics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, M. A., Cuetos, F., & Carreiras, M. (1998). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español. Ediciones de la Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 339–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., & McIsaac, H. (1991). Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 131–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanyukov, P. M., Warren, T., Wheeler, M. E., & Reichle, E. D. (2012). The emergence of frequency effects in eye movements. Cognition, 123, 185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2016). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 1504.06896.
   Google Scholar