Mental Representations of the Text Surface, the Text Base, and the Situation Model in Auditory and Audiovisual Texts in 7-, 9-, and 11-Year-Olds

References

• Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., & Pickering, S. J. (2006). Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: are they separable? Child Development, 77, 1698–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Language comprehension: Archival memory or preparation for situated action? Discourse Processes, 28, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beagles-Roos, J., & Gat, I. (1983). Specific impact of radio and television on children's story comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1992). Explaining “memory free” reasoning. Psychological Science, 3, 332–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Walters, E. K., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). You heard it here first: Readers mentally simulate described sounds. Acta Psychologica, 135, 209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 60–81.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diergarten, A. K., & Nieding, G. (2015). Children's and adults' ability to build online emotional inferences during comprehension of audiovisual and auditory texts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen, J. A., Bouwmeester, S., De Bruin, A. B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 659–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D., & Gentner, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Anes, M. (1994). Why study spoken language? In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 34–36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory & Cognition, 29, 336–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. R., & Chrysler, S. T. (1990). Surface forms, textbases, and situation models: Recognition memory for three types of textual information. Discourse Processes, 13, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. D., & Tobias, S. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 117–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 197–241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, J., Anderson, D. R., Smith, R., Field, D. E., & Fischer, C. (1986). Young children's recall and reconstruction of audio and audiovisual narratives. Child Development, 57(4),1014–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhoot, A. F., & Semb, P. A. (2008). Do illustrations enhance preschoolers' memories for stories? Age-related change in the picture facilitation effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 99, 271–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmann, J., Levin, J. R., & Pressley, M. (1977). Pictures, partial pictures, and young children's oral prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 473–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. S., Kelly, S. B., & Mandel, M. (1986). Media differences in children's story synopses: Radio and television contrasted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemforth, B., & Konieczny, L. (2008). Saetze und Texte verstehen und produzieren. In J. Muesseler & W. Prinz (Eds.), Lehrbuch Allgemeine Psychologie (pp. 504–552). Heidelberg: Spektrum.
   Google Scholar
• Hitch, G. J., Halliday, S., Schaafstal, A. M., & Schraagen, J. M. C. (1988). Visual working memory in young children. Memory & Cognition, 16, 120–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Rapp, D. N. (2003). Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhof, M., Echternach, B., Huber, S., & Knorr, S. (1996). Hören und Sehen. Behaltensrelevante Effekte von Illustrationen beim Zuhören. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 24, 329–342.
   Google Scholar
• Isberner, M.-B., Richter, T., Maier, J., Knuth-Herzig, K., Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2013). Comprehending conflicting science-related texts: graphs as plausibility cues. Instructional Science, 41, 849–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kürschner, C., & Schnotz, W. (2008). Das Verhältnis gesprochener und geschriebener Sprache bei der Konstruktion mentaler Repräsentationen. Psychologische Rundschau, 59, 139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30, 195–232.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1999). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 213–256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). How nonexperts understand conflicting information on social science issues: The role of perceived plausibility and reading goals. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 25, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational psychologist, 32, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1980). Priming in item recognition: The organization of propositions in memory for text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 369–386.
   Google Scholar
• Michalczyk, K., Malstädt, N., Worgt, M., Könen, T., & Hasselhorn, M. (2013). Age differences and measurement invariance of working memory in 5-to 12-year-old children. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., Radvansky, G. A., Lynchard, N. A., & Copeland, D. E. (2011). Are older adults more attuned to morally charged information? Experimental Aging Research, 37, 398–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieding, G. (2006). Wie verstehen Kinder Texte? Die Entwicklung kognitiver Repräsentationen [How do children understand texts? The development of cognitive representations]. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Paechter, M. (1997). Auditive und visuelle Texte in Lernsoftware. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 3, 223–240.
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations. A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S. (2000). Working memory: A developmental study of phonological recoding. Memory, 8, 179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162, 8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 10. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezdek, K., Lehrer, A., & Simon, S. (1984). The relationship between reading and cognitive processing of television and radio. Child Development, 2072–2082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Working memory test battery for children (WMTB-C). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, I., & Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., Copeland, D. E., Berish, D. E., & Dijkstra, K. (2003). Aging and situation model updating. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 10, 158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall, J., & Harris, P. L. (2000). In Cinderella's slippers? Story comprehension from the protagonist's point of view. Developmental Psychology, 36, 202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder, L. M. (1982). Plausibility judgments versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification. Psychological Review, 89, 250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Kiernan, B. (1994). Development of gist versus verbatim memory in sentence recognition: Effects of lexical familiarity, semantic content, encoding instructions, and retention interval. Developmental Psychology, 30, 178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, C. M., & Beal, C. R. (2002). The effect of interactive media on children's story memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Processing of color words activates color representations. Cognition, 111, 383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri, A., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2013). Make your own kinds of cues: When children make more accurate inferences than adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 517–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1979). Media and symbol systems as related to cognition and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. (2015). Memory Development from Early Childhood Through Emerging Adulthood. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (1993). On the relation of dual coding and mental models in graphics comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 3, 247–249.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. Mayer (Ed.) In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 72–103). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., & Baadte, C. (2015). Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 43, 605–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Würzner, K.-M., Heister, J., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2015). childLex: A lexical database of German read by children. Behavior research methods, 47, 1085–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, K. (2001). Perceptual boundedness and perceptual support in conceptual development. Psychological Review, 108, 691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation. Cognitive Processing, 10, 335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Van Den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsöld, I., & Nieding, G. (2009). Die Bildung prädiktiver Inferenzen von Kindern und Erwachsenen bei der kognitiven Verarbeitung audiovisueller und auditiver Texte [Predictive inferences in children and adults during the cognitive processing of audiovisual and auditory texts]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41, 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, F., Mitchell, P., & Currie, G. (2005). How does narrative cue children's perspective taking? Developmental Psychology, 41, 115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 83–121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar