Perspective Effects During Reading: Evidence from Text Change-Detection

References

• Anderson, R.C., & Pichert, J.W (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 17, 1–12
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Baillet S.D., & Keenan J.M. (1986). The role of encoding and retrieval processes in the recall of text. Discourse Process, 9, 247–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, R., & Flammer, A. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in memory for prose. Discourse Processes, 9, 247–268.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Emmott, C., Sanford, A. J., & Morrow, L. I. (2006). Capturing the attention of readers? Stylistic and psychological perspectives on the use and effect of text fragmentation in narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, 35, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Brightman, E., Gathercole, C., & Leuthold, H. (2017). The emotional impact of verbal irony: Eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Sauermann, A. (2011). The influence of focus identification on eye movements during reading. In I. Gilchrist, S. Everling, & S. P. Liversedge (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 925–941). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D.L., Renolds, R.E., & Radin, I.I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 500–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. R. (1985). Granularity (pp. 432–435). Presented at the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, 18–23 August, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2008). Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2002). Perspective effects on on-line text processing. Discourse Processes, 33, 159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2005). Perspective effects on expository text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eyetracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40, 239–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, S., Sanford, A. J., Clifton, C. Jr., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2008). Good-enough representation in plural and singular pronominal reference: Modulating the conjunction cost. In J.K. Gundel and N. Hedberg (Eds.), Reference: Interdisciplinary perspectives on reference processing (pp. 123–139). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Sammons, W.H., & Whitney, P. (1991). Reading perspectives and memory for text: An individual differences analysis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 1074–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome, G.L., III. (1986). The effects of reader perspective and cognitive style on remembering important information from texts. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 17, 199–214.
   Google Scholar
• Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1977). Taking different perspectives on a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J.S., Price, J., & Sanford, A.J. (2009). Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences. Memory & Cognition, 37, 880–888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J.S., Sanford, A.J., Filik, R., & Molle J. (2005). Depth of lexical-semantic processing and sentential load. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 378–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J.S., Sanford, A.J., Molle J., & Emmott, C. (2006). Shallow processing and attention capture in written and spoken discourse. Discourse Processes, 42, 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, P., Sanford, A. J., Stewart, A., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: an application of the change-detection paradigm Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 882–888.
   Google Scholar
• Winer, B (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar