Coordinating Utterances During Turn-Taking: The Role of Prediction, Response Preparation, and Articulation

References

• Almor, A. (2008). Why does language interfere with vision-based tasks? Experimental Psychology, 55, 260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide. Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiloni, C., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Rossini, P. M., Neuper, C., Pfurtscheller, G., & Babiloni, F. (1999). Human movement-related potentials vs desynchronization of EEG alpha rhythm: a high-resolution EEG study. Neuroimage, 10, 658–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 477–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, G. W., Cutler, A., & Pearson, M. (1982). Why is Mrs Thatcher interrupted so often? Nature, 300, 744–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, K. (1995). Sentence production: From mind to mouth. In J. L. Miller & P. D. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 181–216). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Magyari, L., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation. Scientific Reports, 5, 12881. doi: 10.1038/srep12881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., & Torreira, F. (2015). Listeners use intonational phrase boundaries to project turn ends in spoken interaction. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 46–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohan, J., Leuthold, H., Hijikata, Y., & Sanford, A. J. (2012). The processing of good-fit semantic anomalies: An ERP investigation. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3174–3184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohan, J., & Sanford, A. (2008). Semantic anomalies at the borderline of consciousness: An eye-tracking investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 232–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiteau, T. W., Malone, P. S., Peters, S. A., & Almor, A. (2014). Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 295–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B13–B25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Ter Keurs, M. (1999). Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing. Open- and closed-class words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 261–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17, 85–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 886–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2002). On synchronous speech. Acoustic Research Letters Online, 3, 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2003). Practice and performance in speech produced synchronously. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, F. (2009). Rhythm as entrainment: The case of synchronous speech. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 16–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1983). A language specific comprehension strategy. Nature, 304, 159–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., Mitterer, H., & Enfield, N. J. (2006). Projecting the end of a speaker’s turn: A cognitive cornerstone of conversation. Language, 82, 515–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, S. (1974). On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society, 3, 161–180.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, S., & Niederehe, G. (1974). On signaling that it’s your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 234–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, A. K., & Fries, P. (2010). Beta-band oscillations—Signalling the status quo? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 210–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1187–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Holmes, V. M. (1978). Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition, 6, 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S., Petrone, C., Krivokapić, J., & Hoole, P. (2013). Acoustic and respiratory evidence for utterance planning in German. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2015). The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisladottir, R. S., Chwilla, D. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Conversation electrified: ERP correlates of speech act recognition in underspecified utterances. PLoS One, 10, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2011). Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue. Computer Speech and Language, 25, 601–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjalmarsson, A. (2011). The additive effect of turn-taking cues in human and synthetic voice. Speech Communication, 53, 23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric, 400, 11–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jungers, M. K., & Hupp, J. M. (2009). Speech priming: Evidence for rate persistence in unscripted speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungers, M. K., Palmer, C., & Speer, S. R. (2002). Time after time: The coordinating influence of tempo in music and speech. Cognitive Processing, 2, 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilavik, B. E., Zaepffel, M., Brovelli, A., MacKay, W. A., & Riehle, A. (2013). The ups and downs of beta oscillations in sensorimotor cortex. Experimental Neurology, 245, 15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konopka, A. E. (2012). Planning ahead: How recent experiences with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 143–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14, 41–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes, and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication–origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 6–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local, J., & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42, 255–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mädebach, A., Oppermann, F., Hantsch, A., Curda, C., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2011). Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Language, 37, 522–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyari, L., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., De Ruiter, J. P., & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Early anticipation lies behind speed of response in conversation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2530–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyari, L., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2012). Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehler, J., Dommergues, S., Fraunfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 20, 298–305.
   Google Scholar
• Menenti, L., Gierhan, S. M. E., Segaert, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Shared language: Overlap and segregation of the neuronal infrastructure for speaking and listening revealed by functional MRI. Psychological Science, 22, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture- word interference experiments Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., Dahlslätt, K., & Maris, E. (2015a). Withholding planned speech is reflected in synchronized beta-band oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., Rommers, J., & Maris, E. (2015b). Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 2767–2780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schiefers, H. (2011). Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 404–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piai, V., Roelofs, A., & Schriefers, H. (2014). Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Language, 40, 147–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajah, M. N., Languay, R., & Grady, C. L. (2011). Age-related changes in right middle frontal gyrus volume correlate with altered episodic retrieval activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 17941–17954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K., M., Head, D., Williamson A, &Acker, J. D.,(2005). Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1676–1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riest, C., Jorschick, A. B., & De Ruiter, J. P. (2015). Anticipation in turn-taking: Mechanisms and information sources. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1580–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 307. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations of comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., Leuthold, H., Bohan, J., & Sanford, A. J. S. (2010). Anomalies at the borderline of awareness: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends of Cognitive Science, 6, 382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segaert, K., Menenti, L., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension—An fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1662–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014). Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, E4687–E4696.
   Google Scholar
• Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2006). Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either…or. Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 425–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., … & Levinson, S. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10587–10592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interview. Human Communication Research, 11, 139–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, B., Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2013). Effects of conversational pressures on speech planning. Discourse Processes, 50, 23–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torreira, F., Bögels, S., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: the time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 10–3389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J., Brown, C. M., Zwisterlood, P., Koojiman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 443–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde, M., Meyer, A. S., & Konopka, A. E. (2014). Message formulation and structural assembly: Describing “easy” and “hard” events with preferred and dispreferred syntactic structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 124–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissers, C. T. W. M., Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences. Brain Research, 1106, 150–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. E., Strafella, A. P., & Paus, T. (2003). Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropscyhologia, 41, 989–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004). Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 701–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Wilson, T. P. (2005). An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 957–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M. … & Schroeder, C. E. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party.” Neuron, 77, 980–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar