Comprehension of Indirect Requests Is Influenced by Their Degree of Imposition

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K.M., van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2572–2578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1990). Politeness theory: exemplar and exemplary. In I. Rock (Ed.), The Legacy of Solomon Asch. Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 23–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18, 159–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Schunk, D. H. (1980). Polite responses to polite requests. Cognition, 8, 111–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech act (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (2005). Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1, 73–93.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J-N. (1990). Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J-N. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117, 785–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichty, G., & Applegate, J.L. (1991). Social-cognitive and situational influences on the use of face-saving persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 7, 451–484.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V., & Hervé, M. (2015). lsmeans: least-squares means. R package version 2.18. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lsmeans.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 833–838.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (computer software). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding written language. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J., & Garrod, S.C. (1998) The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar