Role of Emoticons as Structural Markers in Twitter Interactions

References

• Ahn, W. (2010). The emotional effect of emoticon on interpreting text message. Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 5(1), 11–18. doi:10.17210/jhsk.2010.05.5.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Amaghlobeli, N. (2012). Linguistic features of typographic emoticons in SMS discourse. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(2), 348–354. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.2.348-354
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, P. (1994). Put on a happy face, but not in my e-mail. User Friendly, in Seattle Times. Retrieved from http://www.mit.edu/people/cordelia/smileys_edit.html
   Google Scholar
• Ascone, L. (2015). The computer-mediated expression of surprise. In A. Celle & L. Lansari (Eds.), Expressing and describing surprise (pp. 121–151). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Asteroff, J. F. (1987). Paralanguage in electronic mail: A case study. PhD dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. (1992). The contextualization of language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Azuma, J., & Maurer, H. (2007). From emoticon to universal symbolic signs: Can written language survive in cyberspace? Proceedings of the 3rd International Microlearning 2007 Conference (pp. 106–122). Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford, England: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2009). The myth of impoverished signal: Dispelling the spoken-language fallacy for emoticons in online communication. In J. Vincent & L. Fortunati (Eds.), Emotion and ICTs (pp. 107–135). London, England: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S., & Ling, R. (2011). Necessary smileys and useless periods: Redefining punctuation in electronically-mediated communication. Visible Language, 45(1–2), 45–67.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, T. (1996). The syntax and semantics of punctuation and its use in interpretation. In Punctuation in computational linguistics. SIGPARSE 1996, Post Conference Workshop of ACL1996 (pp. 1–8). Santa Cruz, CA: UCSC.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 15–28). London, England: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cunnings, I., & Finlayson, I. (2015). Mixed effects modeling and longitudinal data analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 159–181). New York and London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. (2016). The semiotics of Emoji. The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London, England: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Danet, B., & Herring, S. C. (2007). The multilingual internet: Language, culture, and communication online. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 842–849. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filik, R., Turcan, A., Thompson, D., Harvey, N., Davies, H., & Turner, A. (2015). Sarcasm and emoticons: Comprehension and emotional impact. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1–17. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1017513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. B., Bukatko, D., Hallahan, M., & Crawford, M. (2007). The medium makes a difference: Gender similarities and difference in instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(4), 389–397. doi:10.1177/0261927X07306982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C., & Martino, O. I. (2007). Emoticons and impression formation. Applied Semiotics, 19, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fullwood, C., Orchard, L., & Floyd, S. (2013). Emoticon convergence in Internet chat rooms. Social Semiotics, 23(5), 648–662. doi:10.1080/10350330.2012.739000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffney, D., & Puschmann, C. (2014). Data collection on Twitter. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 55–67). London, England: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, S. T. (2015). The most underused statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora, 10(1), 95–125. doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Gunraj, D. N., Drumm-Hewitt, A. M., Dashow, E. M., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2016). Texting insincerely: The role of the period in text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1067–1075. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A. D. (2012). Patterns of emoticon usage in ESL students’ discussion forum writing. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 694–717. doi:10.11139/cj.29.4
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, J. T. (2004). Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 447–463. doi:10.1177/0261927X04269587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautasaari, A., Yamashita, N., & Gao, G. (2017). How non-native english speakers perceive the emotional valence of messages in text-based computer-mediated communication. Discourse Processes, 1–17. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1323184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond microblogging: Conversation and collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42), Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, K. J., Upadhyay, S. S. N., & Klin, C. M. (2018). Punctuation in text messages may convey abruptness. Period. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 112–121. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovy, D., Johannsen, A., & Søgaard, A. (2015). User review sites as a resource for large-scale sociolinguistic studies. In A. Gangemi, S. Leonardi, & A. Panconesi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 452–461). New York, NY: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, K. A., & Hsieh, P. L. (2014). Age difference in recognition of emoticons. In S. Yamamoto (Ed.), Human interface and the management of information. Information and knowledge in applications and services (Vol. 8522, pp. 394–403). HIMI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, S. H., & Tseng, T. H. (2017). Playfulness in mobile instant messaging: Examining the influence of emoticons and text messaging on social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 405–414. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jibril, T. A., & Abdullah, M. H. (2013). Relevance of emoticons in computer-mediated communication contexts: An overview. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 201–207. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n4p201
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, F. B. (2004). A generational approach to using emoticons as nonverbal communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(4), 321–328. doi:10.2190/9EQH-DE81-CWG1-QLL9
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. (2017). Motivations for the using emoticon: Exploring the effect of motivations and intimacies between users on the attitude and behaviors of using emoticon. Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 12(2), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Levshina, N. (2015). How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, U. M. (2015). Emotion in language. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2010). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera, Y., León, J. A., Escudero, I., & de Vega, M. (2017). Do causal and concessive connectives guide emotional expectancies in comprehension? A double-task paradigm using emotional icons. Discourse Processes, 5(8), 583–598. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1137445
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, G. (1990). The linguistics of punctuation. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
   Google Scholar
• Ong, K. K. W. (2011). Disagreement, confusion, disapproval, turn elicitation and floor holding: Actions as accomplished by ellipsis marks-only turns and blank turns in quasisynchronous chats. Discourse Studies, 13, 211–234. doi:10.1177/1461445610392138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Barash, V., Fink, C., & Cha, M. (2013). Emoticon style: Interpreting differences in emoticons across cultures. Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (p. 466–475). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poyatos, F. (2009). Punctuation as nonverbal communication: Toward an interdisciplinary approach to writing. Semiotica, 34(1–2), 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Provine, R. R., Spencer, R. J., & Mandell, D. L. (2007). Emotional expression online. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 299–307. doi:10.1177/0261927X06303481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raclaw, J. (2006). Punctuation as social action: The ellipsis as a discourse marker in computer-mediated communication. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1), 299–306. doi:10.3765/bls.v32i1.3469
   Google Scholar
• Schmid, H., (1994). Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing. Manchester, UK
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. (2014). Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. IX–XXVI). London, England: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schnoebelen, T. J. (2012). Emotions Are Relational: Positioning and the Use of Affective Linguistic Resources. PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stansford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, S. (2016). Fiumi di parole. Discorso e grammatica delle interazioni scritte in Twitter. Loreto, Italy: StreetLib.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, S. (in press). Emoticons as multifunctional and pragmatic Resources: A corpus-based Study on Twitter. Clermont-Ferrand, France: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, S., & Cancila, J. (2013). Gender issues in the interactions of Italian politicians on Twitter: Identity, representation and flows of conversation. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies and Environmental Communication, 2(2), 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Tagg, C. (2012). Discourse of text messaging: Analysis of SMS communication. London, England: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D., & Filik, R. (2016). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(2), 105–120. doi:10.1111/jcc4.2016.21.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tossell, C. C., Kortum, P., Shepard, C., Barg-Walkow, L. H., Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 659–663. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergriff, I. (2013). Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergriff, I. (2014). A pragmatic investigation of emoticon use in nonnative/native speaker text chat. Language@Internet, 11(4).
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347. doi:10.1177/089443930101900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witmer, D., & Katzman, S. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 827–833. doi:10.1089/10949310050191809
   Google Scholar
• Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Yus, F. (2014). Not all emoticons are created equal. Linguagem Em (Dis)Curso, 14(3), 511–529. doi:10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414
   Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media. How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London, England: Continuum.
   Google Scholar