Challenges in Processes of Validation and Comprehension

References

• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1995). The role of context in accessing distant information during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1459–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Accessing distant text information during reading: Effects of contextual cues. Discourse Processes, 26, 87–108. doi:10.1080/01638539809545040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O‘Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049. doi:10.1037/h0077720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, C., Livesay, K., & Lund, K. (1998). Explorations in context space: Words, sentences, and discourse. Discourse Processes, 25, 211–257. doi:10.1080/01638539809545027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98, 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45–73. doi:10.1037/h0076248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. (1979). Language comprehension in old age. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 412–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Myers, J. L. (2004). Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge? Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 268–288. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & O‘Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51, 26–49. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. (1984). Prenominal adjectives and the disambiguation of anaphoric nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 683–695. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90418-3
   Google Scholar
• Dechene, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wanke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238–257. doi:10.1177/1088868309352251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1983). The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 121–132. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80010-3
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117–1145. doi:10.1038/nn1504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Wang, T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 1087–1100. doi:10.3758/MC.38.8.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Swire, B., & Lewandowsky, S. (2014). Correcting misinformation: A challenge for education and cognitive science. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 13–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540–551. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90165-1
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, L. K., Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., Ornstein, P. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2013). Creating illusions of knowledge: Learning errors that contradict prior knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1–5. doi:10.1037/a0028649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44, 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Picture the difference: Electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 40, 730–747. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00193-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. B., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 443–448. doi:10.1177/0963721418794491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The role of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–368. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Lowder, M. W. (2016). Predictions, information structure, and good-enough language structure. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 217–247). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57–84. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferretti, T. R., Singer, M., & Harwood, J. (2013). Processes of discourse integration: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Discourse Processes, 50, 165–186. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.766123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 465–495. doi:10.1080/14640748108400804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119–136. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.2.119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Forsyth, C. (2013). Discourse comprehension. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 475–491). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala, C. M., & O‘Brien, E. J. (1995). Strategies for resolving coherence breaks in reading. Discourse Processes, 20, 167–185. doi:10.1080/01638539509544936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes, 37, 187–204. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby, P. A. (1974). Surface structure and presupposition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 530–538. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80005-8
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, J., Dopkins, S. E., Klin, C. M., & Myers, J. L. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1053–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2013a). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142, 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2013b). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 13–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When discredited information in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1420–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1–37. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577. doi:10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoeferle, P., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 48, 495–506. doi:10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 32–59. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., DeLong, K. A., & Smith, N. J. (2011). A look around at what lies ahead: Prediction and predictability in language processing. In M. Bar (Ed.), Predictions in the brain: Using our past to generate a future (pp. 190–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.207.4435.1030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato‘s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, W. H., & McCully, J. (2017, November). Tracking and representation of goal-relevant location information in narrative processing. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse Processes, 34, 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86–88. doi:10.3758/BF03336715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., & Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Lea, R. B. (2005). Have we been searching for meaning in all the wrong places? Defining the “search after meaning” principle in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 39, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1996). The availability of causal information during reading. Discourse Processes, 22, 145–170. doi:10.1080/01638539609544970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers‘ sentence- and text-level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 129–145. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. F., & Radvansky, G. A. (1997). The fate of completed goal information. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 293–310. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. J., Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. (2003). Learning facts from fiction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 519–536. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00092-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37, 913–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. Psychological Review, 86, 287–330. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.4.287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, E. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megias, P., Macizo, P., & Herrera, A. (2015). Simple arithmetic: Evidence of an inhibitory mechanism to select arithmetic facts. Psychological Research, 79, 773–784. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0603-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1991). The role of context in accessing antecedents in text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., Hakala, C. M., & Rizzella, M. L. (1995). Activation and suppression of antecedents during reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 626–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016a). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53, 326–338. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016b). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 249–276). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1998). Memory-based text processing [Special issue]. Discourse Processes, 26, 2–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory based test processing review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1200–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1987). The role of causal connections in the retrieval of text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 419–427. doi:10.3758/BF03197731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in text. Psychological Science, 3, 229–235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solo (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. M., Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., & Horton, W. S. (2014). Amazing stories: Acquiring and avoiding inaccurate information from fiction. Discourse Processes, 51, 50–74. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Noticing and revising discrepancies as texts unfold. Discourse Processes, 46, 1–24. doi:10.1080/01638530802629141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1989). Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 139–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A. (2004). Exploring automaticity in text processing: Syntactic ambiguity as a test case. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 333–369. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A. (2007). Testing the shared resource assumption in theories of text processing. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 155–183. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2009). Memory-based processing as a mechanism of automaticity in text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 353–370. doi:10.1037/a0014733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201. doi:10.3758/BF03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 57–81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichel, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–526. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03000104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, M. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52, 148–166. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Rapp, D., Eds. (2014). Comprehension and validation of text information. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2). [Special issue]. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Singer, M. (2018). Discourse updating: Acquiring and revising knowledge through discourse. In M. Schober, D. Rapp, & A. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (Vol. 2, pp. 219–241). Amsterdam: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., Hahnel, A., & Becker, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieval situation models of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27,67–80. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (2005). Memory-based approaches and beyond. Discourse Processes, 39, 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman & R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detention, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Richter, T., & Hoever, I. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 237–259. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (1990). Psychology of language: An introduction to sentence and discourse processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574–591. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366. doi:10.1177/0963721413495236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (Chair). 2016, July). Language validation: Monitoring text and discourse congruence. Symposium presented at the 31st International Congress of Psychology, Yokohama, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2017). Memory for text and discourse: Retrieval and comprehension. In J. Wixted & J. Byrne, (Eds.), Cognitive psychology of memory, Vol. 2 of Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (2nd ed., pp. 357–381). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Doering, J. C. (2014). Exploring individual differences in language validation. Discourse Processes, 51, 167–188. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421–441. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90026-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Revlin, R., & Halldorson, M. (1990). Bridging-inferences and enthymeme. In A. Graesser & G. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 35–51). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Solar, K. G., & Spear, J. (2017). Validating presupposed versus focused text information. Memory & Cognition, 45, 456–479. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0673-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Spear, J., & Rodrigo-Tamarit, M. (2018, November). Text comprehension: The reading-time consistency effect. Poster presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 276–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Hyona, J., & Majewski, H. (2007). The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: Evidence from noun-noun compounds. Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 33, 1162–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder‘s method. In W. Koster (Ed.), Attention and performance, II. Acta Psychologica (Vol. 30, pp. 412–431).
   Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2006). Eye movements and spoken language comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 863–900). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., & Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 16, 283–298. doi:10.3758/BF03197039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwisterlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701–718.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A landscape view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Charlotte, NC, US: IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., & McIsaac, H. (1991). Fractioning the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 131–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes, A. L., & Leatherbarrow, M. (1988). Editing episodic memory following the identification of error. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 361–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. R., Cook, A. E., & O‘Brien, E. J. (2018). Validating semantic illusions: Competition between context and general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1414–1429. doi:10.1037/xlm0000526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency and consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle of social cognition (pp. 89–111). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zbrodoff, N. J., & Logan, G. D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 118–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar