1,568
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Getting a Grip: The PET Framework for Studying How Reader Emotions Influence Comprehension

ORCID Icon

References

  • Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality: Vol. 1. Psychological aspects. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815
  • Batson, C. D., Shaw, L. L., & Oleson, K. C. (1992). Differentiating affect, mood, and emotion: Toward functionally-based conceptual distinctions. In M. S. Clarke (Ed.), Emotion (pp. 294–326). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Beukeboom, C. J., & Semin, G. R. (2006). How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 553–566. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.005
  • Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (1995). Affective states and the influence of activated general knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(7), 766–778. doi:10.1177/0146167295217010
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M. (2018). The complexities of comprehension: Conducting think-aloud studies with multiple interacting variables. SAGE Research Methods Cases. doi:10.4135/9781526439550
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Johnson, E. J., Maslowski, A., Swanson, L., Thoreson, K., & Womeldorf, S. (2017). The “chemistry” of learning: Interacting effects of emotions, goals, and text cohesion. Paper presented at the Society for Text and Discourse, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Kendeou, P. (2014). The interplay of reader goals, working memory, and text structure during reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 206–219. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.003
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Marzolf, B. A., & Heisler, J. D. (2016). Taking pride or feeling shame: The effects of emotions on inferences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Kassel, Germany.
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Mueller, M. K. (2013). Affective and cognitive interactions in inference generation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562–577. doi:10.1037/a0023458
  • Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Emotions in reading and writing. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 437–457). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129–148.
  • Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G., & Monteiro, K. P. (1981). Selectivity of learning caused by affective states. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110(4), 451–473.
  • Bower, G. H., Monteiro, K. P., & Gilligan, S. G. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(5), 573–585. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90348-1
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children‘s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42.
  • Cook, A. E., & O‘Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 26–49. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
  • D‘Mello, S. K., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). Emotions during learning with Autotutor. In P. Durlach & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 117–139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • D‘Mello, S. K., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning & Instruction, 29(1), 153–170.
  • Davitz, J. R. (1969). The language of emotion. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • de l‘Etoile, S. K. (2002). The effect of a musical mood induction procedure on mood state-dependent word retrieval. Journal of Music Therapy, 39(2), 145–160.
  • Egidi, G., & Gerrig, R. J. (2009). How valence affects language processing: Negativity bias and mood congruence in narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37(5), 547–555.
  • Elfenbein, A., & Bohn-Gettler, C. M. (2016). Online effects of personality and need for cognition while reading stories with differing emotions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Kassel, Germany.
  • Ellis, H. C., & Ashbrook, P. W. (1988). Resource allocation model of the effect of depressed mood states on memory. In K. Fiedler & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Affect, cogntion, and social behavior (pp. 25–43). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe International.
  • Ellis, H. C., & Ashbrook, P. W. (1989). The “state” of mood and memory research: A selective review. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4, 1–21.
  • Ellis, H. C., Moore, B. A., Varner, L. J., Ottaway, S. A., & Becker, A. S. (1997). Depressed mood, task organization, cognitive interference, and memory: Irrelevant thoughts predict recall performance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 453–470.
  • Ellis, H. C., Ottaway, S. A., Varner, L. J., Becker, A. S., & Moore, B. A. (1997). Emotion, motivation, and text comprehension: The detection of contradictions in passages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 126, 131–146. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.2.131
  • Ellis, H. C., Varner, L. J., Becker, A. S., & Ottaway, S. A. (1995). Emotion and prior knowledge in memory and judged comprehension of ambiguous stories. Cognition and Emotion, 9(4), 363–382. doi:10.1080/02699939508408972
  • Ferraro, F. R., King, B., Ronning, B., Pekarski, K., & Risan, J. (2003). Effects of induced emotional state on lexical processing in younger and older adults. The Journal of Psychology, 137, 262–272.
  • Fiedler, K. (2000). Toward an integrative account of affect and cognition phenomena using the BIAS computer algorithm. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 223–252). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiedler, K., & Beier, S. (2014). Affect and cognitive processing in educational contexts. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of emotions in education (pp. 36–55). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39
  • Forgas, J. P. (2001). The Affect Infusion Model (AIM): An integrative theory of mood effects on cognition and judgments. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user‘s guidebook (pp. 99–134). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Gable, P. A., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2008). Approach-motivated positive affect reduces breadth of attention. Psychological Science, 19(5), 476–482.
  • Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science, 13, 33–39. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00406
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., Hallada, B. M., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1998). How automatically do readers infer fictional characters‘ emotional states? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 271–300.
  • Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M., & Goldman, S. R. (2018). Afterword: World-wide changes in discourse and the changing field of discourse processes. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (Vol. 2, pp. 390–396). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
  • Gunther, D. C., Ferraro, F. R., & Kirchner, T. (1996). Influence of emotional state on irrelevant thoughts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 491–494. doi:10.3758/BF03214552
  • Gygax, P., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2003). The representation of characters‘ emotional responses: Do readers infer specific emotions? Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 413–428.
  • Halberstadt, J. B., Niedenthal, P. M., & Kushner, J. (1995). Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional state. Psychological Science, 6(5), 278–282.
  • Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 414–434.
  • Hsu, C.-T., Jacobs, A. M., Citron, F. M., & Conrad, M. (2015). The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter - An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 142, 96–114. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.011
  • Huntsinger, J. R., Clore, G. L., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2010). Mood and global-local focus: Priming a local focus reverses the link between mood and global-local processing. Emotion, 10(5), 722–726. doi:10.1037/a0019356
  • Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 75–85.
  • Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
  • Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(186). doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.0018
  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Kaakinen, J. K., Ballenghein, U., Tissier, G., & Baccino, T. (2018). Fluctuation in cognitive engagement during reading: Evidence from concurrent recordings of postural and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. doi:10.1037/xlm0000539
  • Kendeou, P. (2014). Validation and integration: An integrated overview. Discourse Processes, 51, 189–200.
  • Kendeou, P., & O‘Brien, E. J. (2018). Reading comprehension theories: A view from the top down. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (Vol. 2, pp. 7–21). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kenealy, P. M. (1997). Mood-state-dependent retrieval: The effects of induced mood on memory reconsidered. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 290–317.
  • Kiefer, M., Schuch, S., Schenck, W., & Fiedler, K. (2007). Mood states modulate activity in semantic brain areas during emotional word encoding. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1516–1530. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl062
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
  • Kneepkens, E. W. E. M., & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics, 2, 125–138.
  • Komeda, H., Kawasaki, M., Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2009). Differences between estimating protagonists‘ emotions and evaluating readers‘ emotions in narrative comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 135–151. doi:10.1080/02699930801949116
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834.
  • Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1991). A three-pronged approach for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics, 20, 193–232.
  • Mayer, J. D. (1986). How mood influences cogition advances in cognitive science. In N. E. Sharkey (Ed.), Advances in cognitive science (pp. 290–314). Chichester, West Sussex: Ellis Horwood Limited.
  • McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
  • McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43.
  • McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 477–500.
  • Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.343
  • Mouw, J. M., Van Leijenhorst, L., Saab, N., Danel, M. S., & van den Broek, P. (2017). Contribution of emotion understanding to narrative comprehension in children and adults. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1080/17405629.2017.1334548
  • O‘Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
  • Oatley, K. (2004). Scripts, transformations, and suggestiveness of emotions in Shakespeare and Chekhov. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 323–340.
  • Payne, B. K., & Corrigan, E. (2007). Emotional constraints on intentional forgetting. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(5), 780–786.
  • Pekrun, R. (2017). Achievement emotions. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 251–271). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., Murayama, K., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653–1670. doi:10.1111/cdev.12704
  • Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 3–31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Posner, J., Russell, J. A., & Peterson, B. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 17(3), 715–734. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050340
  • Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 276–279. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00380.x
  • Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Development and Psychopathology, 52, 337–354.
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714
  • Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2006). An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34, 344–355.
  • Schmeichel, B. J., Volokhov, R. N., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1526–1540. doi:10.1037/a0013345
  • Schwarz, N., & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking; Implications for problem solving. In J. E. Davidson & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263–290). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scrimin, S., & Mason, L. (2015). Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 387–406. doi:10.1111/bjep.12080
  • Seibert, P. S., & Ellis, H. C. (1991). Irrelevant thoughts, emotional mood states, and cognitive task performance. Memory & Cognition, 19, 507–513.
  • Serano, S. C., Scott, G. G., Yao, B., Thaden, E. J., & O‘Donnell, P. J. (2015). Emotion word processing: Does mood make a difference? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1191. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01191
  • Sinclair, R. C., & Mark, M. M. (1995). The effects of mood state on judgemental accuracy: Processing strategy as a mechanism. Cognition and Emotion, 9(5), 417–438. doi:10.1080/02699939508408974
  • Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 361–366.
  • Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 539–548.
  • Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Arlington, VA: RAND Corporation.
  • Srinivasan, N., & Hanif, A. (2010). Global-happy and local-sad: Perceptual processing affects emotion identification. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1062–1069.
  • Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2005). With sadness comes accuracy; with happiness, false memory: Mood and the false memory effect. Psychological Science, 16(10), 785–791. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01615.x
  • Trevors, G., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Szydlo, T., & Kendeou, P. (2018). Positive effects of negative emotions: The influence of readers‘ emotions on knowledge revision. Paper presented at the Society for Text and Discourse, Brighton, UK.
  • Trevors, G., & Kendeou, P. (2017). The role of affect in reducing misinformation about vaccinations. Paper presented at the Psychonomic Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • Ucros, C. G. (1989). Mood state-dependent memory: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 139–167.
  • van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
  • van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (1999). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B. Taylor, M. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers‘ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1081–1087. doi:10.3758/BF03206376
  • van den Broek, P., Risden, K., Fletcher, C. R., & Thurlow, R. (1996). A “landscape” view of reading: Fluctuating patterns of activation and the construction of a stable memory representation. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 165–187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers‘ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O‘Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The Landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In S. R. Goldman & H. V. Oostendorp (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Virtue, S., van den Broek, P., & Linderholm, T. (2006). Hemispheric processing of inferences: The effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1341–1354. doi:10.3758/BF03193276
  • von Hecker, U., & Meiser, T. (2005). Defocused attention in depressed mood: Evidence from source monitoring. Emotion, 5(4), 456–463. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.456
  • Yang, H., Yang, S., & Isen, A. M. (2013). Positive affect improves working memory: Implications for controlled cognitive processing. Cognition and Emotion, 27(3), 474–482. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.713325

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.