The Role of Entitlement in Formatting Preferences Across Requesters and Recipients

References

• Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 876–889. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1989). Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society, 18(2), 159–212. doi:10.1017/S0047404500013464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11(4), 430–477. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(79)90020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. doi:10.1177/1461445610370126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpeper, J. (2011). 13. Politeness and impoliteness. Pragmatics of Society, 5, 393.
   Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. doi:10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, J. P., & Albert, S. (2017). An appeal for a methodological fusion of conversation analysis and experimental psychology. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 90–107. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1262050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2010). Citizens’ emergency calls requesting assistance in calls to the police. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 123–138). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5(1), 25–66. doi:10.1017/S0047404500006849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francik, E. P., & Clark, H. H. (1985). How to make requests that overcome obstacles to compliance. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 560–568. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90046-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukada, A., & Asato, N. (2004). Universal politeness theory: Application to the use of Japanese honorifics. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(11), 1991–2002. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2003.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne, C. (2018). Indirectness and entitlement in product requests in British service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 133, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, B. S. (2018). The importance of power, distance, and imposition in Spanish verb forms in requests (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1981). Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(4), 431–444. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90542-9
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1986). What makes some indirect speech acts conventional? Journal of Memory and Language, 25(2), 181–196. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Double Day Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2006). Will you or can’t you? Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1081–1104. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1994). Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(5), 1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1997). Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 624. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. (1990). Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 719. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T., & Yang, J. N. (1992). Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 246. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua-journal of Cross-cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8(2–3), 223–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K., & Shea, B. C. (1996). Threats, suggestions, hints, and promises: Gaining compliance efficiently and politely. Communication Quarterly, 44(2), 145–165. doi:10.1080/01463379609370007
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H. (2017). Using conversation analysis in the lab. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/08351813.2017.1267911
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–79. doi:10.1017/S0047404500000051
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., & Pinker, S. (2010). Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review, 117(3), 785. doi:10.1037/a0019688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics(Issue 30). London, UK: Longman Linguistics Library.
   Google Scholar
• Leichty, G., & Applegate, J. L. (1991). Social-cognitive and situational influences on the use of face‐saving persuasive strategies. Human Communication Research, 17(3), 451–484. doi:10.1111/hcre.1991.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström, A. (2005). Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance. In: A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction(vol. 17, pp. 209–233). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogiermann, E. (2015). In/directness in Polish children’s requests at the dinner table. Journal of Pragmatics, 82, 67–82. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., & Lee, J. J. (2008). The logic of indirect speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(3), 833–838. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707192105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes, 49(5), 426–458. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.684136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2015). The request system in Italian interaction (Doctoral dissertation). Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanowitsch, A. (2003). A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In K.-U. Panther & L. L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, Pragmatics and beyond New Series, (vol. 113, pp. 105–126). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., Le-luan, E., Wood, J. S., Yao, B., & Haigh, M. (2018). Comprehension of indirect requests is influenced by their degree of imposition. Discourse Processes, 55(2), 187–196. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1330046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2016). I need a coffee: Pragmalinguistic variation of requests in starbucks service encounters. IULC Working Papers, 15(1), 34–61.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, J., Hagoort, P., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). Pupillometry reveals increased pupil size during indirect request comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1093–1108. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1065282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer. ISBN 0-387-95457-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zinken, J., & Ogiermann, E. (2013). Responsibility and action: Invariants and diversity in requests for objects in British English and Polish interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(3), 256–276. doi:10.1080/08351813.2013.810409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar