Domain Restriction in Generic Statements

References

• Austin, J. L. (1950). Truth. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical papers (3rd edi., 1979, pp. 117–133). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Costermans, J. (1994). Time, space, and action: Exploring the narrative structure and its linguistic marking. Discourse Processes, 17(3), 421–446. doi:10.1080/01638539409544877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Pierard, S. (2014). Sentence-initial adverbs and text comprehension. In L. Sarda, S. C. Thomas, B. Fagard, & M. Charolles (Eds.), Adverbials in use: From predicative to discourse functions (pp. 151–168). Louvain-la-Neuve, France: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 19(3), 385–406. doi:10.1080/01638539509544924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (2000). Temporal adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 74–87. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocher, A., Chiriacescu, S. I., & von Heusinger, K. (2018). Effects of information status and uniqueness status on referent management in discourse comprehension and planning. Discourse Processes, 55(4), 346–370. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2016.1254990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98(2), 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Haviland, S. E. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse comprehension and production (pp. 1–40). Norwood, NJ: AblexPublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, C., Jr. (2013). Situational context affects definiteness preferences: Accommodation of presuppositions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(2), 487–501. doi:10.1037/a0028975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, A. (2012). Ibex Farm. Retrieved from http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., & Yang, Z. (2019). The problem of comprehension in psycholinguistics. Discourse Processes, 56, 485–495. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2019.1591885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2018). Topic situations: Coherence by inclusion. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2019 submitted). A note on topic situation and domain restriction in the interpretation of definite descriptions. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Sanford, A. (1982). The mental representation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for the interpretation of anaphoric noun phrases. Journal of Semantics, 1, 21–41. doi:10.1093/jos/1.1.21
   Google Scholar
• Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (2017). Situations in natural language semantics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/situations-semantics/
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, A. (2015). A survey of switch-reference in North America. International Journal of American Linguistics, 81(3), 409–448. doi:10.1086/681580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, C. (2017). Possible worlds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), TheStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter, 2017 edition). Stanford, CA. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/possible-worlds/
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (1984). Establishing and accessing referents in discourse. Memory and Cognition, 12, 489–497. doi:10.3758/BF03198311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2019). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, F. (2012). Situation pronouns in determiner phrases. Natural Language Semantics, 20, 431–475. doi:10.1007/s11050-012-9086-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, F. (2019). Definites, domain restriction, and discourse structure. In K. Carlson, C. Clifton Jr., & J. D. Fodor (Eds.), Grammatical approaches to language processing (pp. 187–208). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language, 15(2‐3), 219–261. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar