References
- Aaronson, D., & Scarborough, H. S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.1.56
- Anderson, J. E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2005). An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy. Brain and Language, 94(2), 200–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.001
- Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003
- Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80006-9
- Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Braasch, J. (2012). Documents as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M. A. Britt, S. Goldman, & J. F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading from words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). Routledge.
- Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about semantic illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
- Burkhardt, P. (2007). The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 18(17), 1851–1854. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f1a999
- Calloway, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Integrative and predictive processes in text reading: The N400 across a sentence boundary. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1279340
- Calloway, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2019). Integration and structure building across a sentence boundary: ERP indicators of definite/indefinite article, noun repetition, and comprehension skill effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(1): 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1637911.
- Chang, F. R. (1980). Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference. Memory & Cognition, 8(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197552
- Chen, L., Fang, X., & Perfetti, C. A. (2017). Word-to-text integration: ERP evidence for semantic and orthographic effects in Chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.11.010
- Cho, B.-Y., Han, H., & Kucan, L. (2018). An exploratory study of middle school learners’ historical reading in an internet environment. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(7), 1525–1549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9847-4
- Cirilo, R. K., & Foss, D. J. (1980). Text structure and reading time for sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90560-5
- Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010
- DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1504
- DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2017). Is there a replication crisis? Perhaps. Is this an example? No: A commentary on Ito, Martin, and Nieuwland (2016). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1279339
- Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name: Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
- Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418794491
- Ferreira, F., & Lowder, M. W. (2016). Prediction, information structure, and good-enough language processing. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 65, 217–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.04.002.
- Fesel, S. S., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). Individual variation in children’s reading comprehension across digital text types. Journal of Research in Reading, 41(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.v41.1
- Foertsch, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (1994). In search of complete comprehension: Getting “minimalists” to work. Discourse Processes, 18(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544896
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23(3), 265–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544994
- Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). The generation of knowledge-based inferences during narrative comprehension. Advances in Psychology, 29, 53–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62732-6
- Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
- Haberlandt, K. (1980). Story grammar and reading time of story constituents. Poetics, 9(103), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(80)90014-5
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 177–274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4174965
- Hauk, O. (Ed). (2016). Prediction in language comprehension and production [Special issue]. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102300
- Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new: Acuiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
- Helder, A., Perfetti, C. A., & Van den Broek, P. (in press). Thematic influences on word-to-text integration across a sentence boundary. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1772494
- Helder, A., Perfetti, C. A., Van den Broek, P., Stafura, J. Z., & Calloway, R. C. (2019). ERP indicators of local and global text influences on word-to-text integration. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 34(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1496268
- Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
- Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017a). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1242761
- Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2017b). Why the A/AN prediction effect may be hard to replicate: A rebuttal to Delong, Urbach, & Kutas (2017). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1323112
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0401_4
- Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University press.
- Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329
- Kambe, G., Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194931
- Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction- integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
- Kuperberg, G. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 1146, 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.063
- Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
- Kuperman, V., Dambacher, M., Nuthmann, A., & Kliegl, R. (2010). The effect of word position on eye-movements in sentence and paragraph reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(9), 1838–1857. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003602412
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
- Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207 (4427), 203–205.
- Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
- Lorch, R. F., Jr., & Lorch, E. P. (1985). Topic structure representation and text recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.2.137
- McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). Elsevier.
- Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. A., Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., Donaldson, D. I., Huettig, F., & Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7, e33468. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33468
- Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
- O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val. Model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
- Payne, B. R., Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 52(11), 1456–1469. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12515
- Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. Van Ostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Erlbaum.
- Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720
- Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A(4), 1061–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755934
- Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of valuation. Educational Psychology, 52(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
- Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
- Schumacher, P. B., & Hung, Y.-C. (2012). Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 67(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.006
- Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
- Singer, M. (1980). The role of case‐filling inferences in the coherence of brief passages. Discourse Processes, 3(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538009544487
- Singer, M. (2015). Validation of text and discourse inferences- and explicit content. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch Jr (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 68–93). Cambridge University Press.
- Stafura, J. Z., & Perfetti, C. A. (2014). Word-to-text integration: Message level and lexical level influences in ERPs. Neuropsychologia, 64, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.012
- Stafura, J. Z., Rickles, B., & Perfetti, C. A. (2015). Memory and predictive mechanisms in on- line text comprehension: Lexical association direction and word-to-text integration assessed with ERPs. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(10), 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1062119
- Trabasso, T., & Van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X
- Tzeng, Y., Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Lee, C. (2005). The computational implementation of the landscape model: Modeling inferential processes and memory representations of text comprehension. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 37(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192695
- Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguists (pp. 539–588). Academic Press.
- Van den Broek, P., & Trabasso, T. (1986). Causal networks and goal hierarchies in summarizing text. Discourse Processes, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538609544628
- Van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
- Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197127
- Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198500
- Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
- Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2018). Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71 (1), 64–74.
- Warren, T., McConnell, K., & Rayner, K. (2008). Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1247894
- Warren, T., White, S. J., & Reichle, E. D. (2009). Investigating the causes of wrap-up effects: Evidence from eye movements and E-Z reader. Cognition, 111(1), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.011
- Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). Time for prediction: The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 68, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.014
- Yang, C.-L., Perfetti, C. A., & Schmalhofer, F. (2007). Event-related potential indicators of text integration across sentence boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 55–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.55