Achieving Preallocation: Turn Transition Practices in Board Games

References

• Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. (2009). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences, 31(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, W. A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, E., & Deppermann, A. (2018). Indexing priority of position: Eben as response particle in German. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1449449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2013). Unpacking “self”: Repair and epistemics in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 76(4), 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272513498398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8(1), 3–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culin, S. (1992). Games of the North American Indians. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Voogt, A. (2017). Strategic games in society: the geography of adult play. International Journal of Play, 6(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2017.13829863 doi:10.1080/21594937.2017.1382986
   Google Scholar
• De Voogt, A. (2002). Reproducing board game positions: Western Chess and African Bao. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.61.4.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Gibson, D. R. (2010). More than a game: Sociological theory from the theories of games. Sociological Theory, 28(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Kendrick, K. H. (2018). Searching for trouble: Recruiting assistance through embodied action. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v1i1.104853
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, I. (2007). Ancient board games in perspective. British Museum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2002). Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 14–38). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatics resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 134–184). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2012.666022
   Google Scholar
• Hazel, S., & Mortensen, K. (2017). The classroom moral compass – Participation, engagement and transgression in classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 8(3), 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1282881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (in press). Thinking with the body: Embodying thinking as a practice in board games. In S. Wiggins & K. Osvaldsson (Eds.), Embodiment and discursive psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53709-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E., & Robles, J. (2019). Manipulation in board game interactions: Being a sporting player. Symbolic Interaction, 42(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsson, J., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2015). The organization of turn-taking in pool skate sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1090114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolin, D. (2016, September 25). The rise and rise of tabletop gaming. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/sep/25/board-games-back-tabletop-gaming-boom-pandemic-flash-point
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2018). Sequence initiation or self-talk? Commenting on the surroundings while mucking out a sheep stable. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., & Ekström, A. (2019). How to take the floor as a couple: Turn-taking in Lindy Hop Jam circles. Visual Anthropology, 32(5), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2019.1671750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2013). Framing, grounding, and coordinating conversational interaction: Posture, gaze, facial expression, and movement in space. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Teßendorf (Eds.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 100–112). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450332202X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2014). Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 67, 34–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, K. (2013). More studies in ethnomethodology. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., Livingston, E., & Garfinkel, H. (1983). Temporal order in laboratory work. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 205–238). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2012). Coordinating action and talk-in-interaction in and out of video games. In R. Ayaß & C. Gerhardt (Eds.), The appropriation of media in everyday life (pp. 231–270). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., Svensson, H., & van Schepen, N. (2017). A table-based turn-taking system and its political consequences: Managing participation, building opinion groups, and fostering consensus. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16.1.05mon
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K., & Hazel, S. (2011). Initiating round robins in the L2 classroom: Preliminary observations. Novitas-ROYAL Research on Youth and Language, 5(1), 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100313000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oloff, F. (2013). Embodied withdrawal after overlap resolution. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles, A. J. (2014). ‘Bom Bombed Kwin’: How two card games model Kula, Moka, and Goroka. Oceania, 84(3), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet-Shore, D. (2018). How to Begin. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1485224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, D. J. (2015). Relinquishing in musical masterclasses: Embodied action in interactional projects. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Greiffenhagen, C., & Laurier, E. (2017). Video gaming as practical accomplishment: Ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and play. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 308–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2004). The sequential organization of “explicit” apologies in naturally occurring English. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), 291–330. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2015). The request system in Italian interaction. Radboud University.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.02sac
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. J. (2001). Fruits, apples, and category mistakes: On sport, games, and play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 28(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2001.9714610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess: Experiments with chess-playing tasks and computer simulation of skilled performance throw light on some human perceptual and memory processes. American Scientist, 61(4), 394–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2006). Playing to learn: A qualitative analysis of bilingual pupil-pupil talk during board game play. Language and Education, 20(5), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.2167/le639.0
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M. (2013). Managing participation in interaction: The case of humming. Text & Talk, 33(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35(3), 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutinen, M. (2014). Negotiating favourable conditions for resuming suspended activities. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 137–166). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tykkyläinen, T. (2010). Child-initiated repair in task interactions. In H. Gardner & M. Forrester (Eds.), Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 227–248). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Viney, R. (2015). Everyday interaction in lesbian households: Identity work, body behaviour, and action [Thesis]. Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Zinken, J. (2016). Requesting responsibility: The morality of grammar in Polish and English family interaction. Oxford University Press doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210724.001.0001
   Google Scholar