Micro-Sequential Coordination in Early Responses

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P. (2005). Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. Text, 25(1), 7–36.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Communities, commonalities, and communication. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324–355). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2005). Coordinating with each other in a material world. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Krych, M. A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Marshall, C. R. (1981). Definite reference and mutual reference. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber, & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10–63). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics, 24(3), 623–647. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.08cou
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dausendschön-Gay, U., & Krafft, U. (2009). Preparing next actions in routine activities. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2006). Deontische Infinitivkonstruktionen: Syntax, Semantik, Pragmatik und interaktionale Verwendung. In S. Günthner & W. I. Wolfgang (Eds.), Konstruktionen in der interaktion (pp. 239–262). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2013). Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Changes in turn-design over interactional histories – The case of instructions in driving school lessons. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 293–324). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2018). Special issue on instructions in driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 221–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A. ( in press). On the emergence of shared meanings over an interactional history: wabi sabi in a series of theater rehearsals. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Streeck, J. (2018). The body in interaction: Its multiple modalities and temporalities. In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp. 1–29). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (Eds.). (2014). Requesting in social interaction. Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2006). Social consequences of common ground. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 399–430). Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Gergle, D., Kraut, R. E., & Fussell, S. R. (2004): Action as language in a shared visual space. CSCW’04 - Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 487–496). https/doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031687
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language (pp. 97–121). Institute for Ethnomethodology.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers’ eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, S. (2018). Discovering interactional authenticity: Tracking theatre practitioners across rehearsals. In S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, & E. Gonzalez-Martinez (Eds.), Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction (pp. 255–283). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2021). Passing touch: Handing and handling tools and implements during surgical procedures. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in social interaction. Touch, language, and body (pp. 249–268). Routledge. in press
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J. (2010). Peripherality, participation and communities of practice: Examining the patient in dental training. In N. Llewellyn & J. Hindmarsh (Eds.), Organization, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 218–240). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., Reynolds, P., & Dunne, S. (2011). Exhibiting understanding: The body in apprenticeship. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica, 9(1), 47–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.9.1.47
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1985). An excercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 25–34). Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2014). The putative preference for offers over requests. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 87–114). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Koschman, T. (2011). Special issue: Understanding understanding in action. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 435–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In T. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., Lymer, G., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2015). The sequential analysis of instruction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 142–157). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, S. J. (Eds.). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2013). Coordinating mobile action in real time: The timely organization of directives in video games. In P. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility. Language and the body in motion (pp. 300–342). de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 131–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2015). Introduction de nouveaux référents et gestion de l’attention conjointe: Les apports de l’analyse interactionnelle multimodale. In X. Gradoux, J. Jacquin, & G. Merminoud (Eds.), Agir dans la Diversité des Langues. Mélanges en l’Honneur d’Anne-Claude Berthoud (pp. 115–130). De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018a). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction. Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018b). Driving instruction at high speed on a race circuit: Issues in action formation and sequence organization. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2014). When do people not use language to make requests? In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 303–334). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauppe, S. (2016). Verbal semantics drives early anticipatory eye movements during the comprehension of verb-initial sentences. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(95). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00095
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P. et al. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Translated and adapted for English by E. Couper-Kuhlen & D. Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung, 12, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (1995). On projection. In E. N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence (pp. 87–110). CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., & Jordan, S. J. (2009). Projection and anticipation: The forward-looking nature of embodied interaction. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2015). Deixis in der face-to-face Interaktion. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Stukenbrock, A. (2018). Forward-looking: Where do we go with multimodal projections? In A. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction (pp. 31–68). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Zemel, A., & Koschman, T. (2014). ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar