References
- Amstad, T. (1978). Wie verständlich sind unsere Zeitungen? [How understandable are our newspapers?] [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Zurich.
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017). The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017
- Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J.-F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6
- Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
- Chung-Fat-Yim, A., Peterson, J. B., & Mar, R. A. (2017). Validating self-paced sentence-by-sentence reading: Story comprehension, recall, and narrative transportation. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9704-2
- Cook, A. E., & Guéraud, S. (2005). What have we been missing? The role of general world knowledge in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 39(2–3), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651683
- Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
- De Pereyra, G., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L. G., & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). Reader’s memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.879152
- Ferretti, T. R., Singer, M., & Patterson, C. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence for the time-course of verifying text ideas. Cognition, 108(3), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.002
- Flesch, R. F. A. (1948). New readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
- Foy, J. E., LoCasto, P. C., Briner, S. W., & Dyar, S. (2017). “Would a madman have been so wise as this?” The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 281–295. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
- Gilead, M., Sela, M., & Maril, A. (2019). That’s my truth: Evidence for involuntary opinion confirmation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618762300
- Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from Internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.027
- Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., Horton, W. S., Jenkins, R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Pilgrims sailing the Titanic: Plausibility effects on memory for misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 42(2), 305–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0359-9
- Isberner, M.-B., & Richter, T. (2013). Can readers ignore implausibility? Evidence for nonstrategic monitoring of event-based plausibility in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.003
- Isberner, M.-B., & Richter, T. (2014). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 245–276). MIT Press.
- Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702
- Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
- Lombardi, D., Seyranian, V., & Sinatra, G. M. (2014). Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855049
- Marsh, E. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2006). Learning errors from fiction: Difficulties in reducing reliance on fictional stories. Memory & Cognition, 34(5), 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193260
- Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(4), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022964
- Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545042
- Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(3), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90266-2
- O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016a). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
- O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016b). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B.H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65. pp. 249–276). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.03.004
- O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 35–53). Erlbaum.
- O’Brien, E. J., Rizzella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1200–1210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.5.1200
- Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Erlbaum.
- Piest, B. A., Isberner, M. B., & Richter, T. (2018). Don’t believe everything you hear: Routine validation of audiovisual information in children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 46(6), 849–863. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0807-7
- Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
- Rapp, D. N. (2008). How do readers handle incorrect information during reading? Memory & Cognition, 36(3), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.688
- Rapp, D. N., & Mensink, M. C. (2011). Focusing effects from online and offline reading tasks. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 141–164). Information Age Publishing.
- Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
- Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
- Richter, T., Schroeder, S., & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don’t have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014038
- Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
- Rouet, J.-F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1549–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0
- Saux, G., Ros, C., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., Burin, D. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2018). Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
- Schroeder, S., Richter, T., & Hoever, I. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.001
- Self, C. (2009). Credibility. In D. W. Stacks & M. B. Salwen (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 435–456). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753
- Sherif, C. W., & Sherif, M. (Eds.). (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement, and change. Wiley.
- Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgement-involvement approach. Saunders.
- Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495236
- Singer, M. (2019). Challenges in validation and comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1598167
- Sparks, J. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Readers’ reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021331
- Tauber, S. K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Rhodes, M. G., & Sitzman, D. M. (2013). General knowledge norms: Updated and expanded from the Nelson and Narens (1980) norms. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1115–1143. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0307–9
- Van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–140). Information Age Publishing.
- Van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husbye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch Jr. & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353–373). Erlbaum.
- Van Moort, M. L., Jolles, D. D., Koornneef, A., & van den Broek, P. (2020). What you read versus what you know: Neural correlates of accessing context information and background knowledge in constructing a mental representation during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2084–2101. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000764
- Van Moort, M. L., Koornneef, A., & van den Broek, P. W. (2018). Validation: Knowledge-and text-based monitoring during reading. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1426319
- Van Moort, M. L., Koornneef, A., & van den Broek, P. W. (2021). Differentiating text-based and knowledge-based validation processes during reading: Evidence from eye movements. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 22–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1727683
- Walsh, E. K., Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2018). Processing real-world violations embedded within a fantasy-world narrative. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2282–2294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817740836
- Wertgen, A. G., & Richter, T. (2020). Source credibility modulates the validation of implausible information. Memory & Cognition, 48(8), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01067-9
- Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
- Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333183
- Williams, C. R., Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2018). Validating semantic illusions: Competition between context and general world knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1414–1429. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000526
- Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73