Chasing Theory with Technology: A Quest to Understand Understanding

References

• Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1994). The influence of topic knowledge, domain knowledge, and interest on the comprehension of scientific exposition. Learning and Individual Differences, 6(4), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(94)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2014a). Game-based writing strategy tutoring for second language learners: Game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Language Learning and Technology, 18(2), 124–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2016a). Modeling individual differences among writers using ReaderBench. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martínez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EduLearn) (pp. 5269–5279). Barcelona, Spain: IATED.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2016b). Computer-based writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 316–329). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Likens, A. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Writing flexibility in argumentative essays: A multidimensional analysis. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1607–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9921-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). You are your words: Modeling students’ vocabulary knowledge with natural language processing. In O. C. Santos, J. G. Boticario, C. Romero, M. Pechenizkiy, A. Merceron, P. Mitros, J. M. Luna, C. Mihaescu, P. Moreno, A. Hershkovitz, S. Ventura, & M. Desmarais (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th international conference on educational data mining (EDM 2015) (pp. 258–265). Madrid, Spain: International Educational Data Mining Society.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Perret, C. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2016c). Linguistic signatures of cognitive processes during writing. In J. Trueswell, A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, & D. Mirman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the cognitive science society in Philadelphia, PA (pp. 2483–2488). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., Crossley, S. A., Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2014b). Reading comprehension components and their relation to the writing process. L’année psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 114(4), 663–691. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503314004047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2016d). The narrative waltz: The role of flexibility on writing performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(7), 911–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays ( M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson, & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balyan, R., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). Applying natural language processing and hierarchical machine learning approaches to text difficulty classification. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 30(3), 337–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00201-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K., Pirolli, P. L., & Brown, A. L. (1995). Training in self-explanation and self regulation strategies: Investigating the effects of knowledge acquisition activities on problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 13(2), 221–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1302_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Word matching, latent semantic analysis, and topic models. In A. Kao & S. Poteet (Eds.), Natural language processing and text mining (pp. 91–106). Springer-Verlag UK.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., & McCrudden, M. T. (Eds.). (2018). Handbook of multiple source use. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Kessler, E. D. (2021). Towards a theoretical model of source comprehension in everyday discourse. Discourse Processes, 1–19. ( note this paper is in the same special issue). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1905393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioaca, V., Dascalu, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). Extractive summarization using cohesion network analysis and submodular set functions. In 22nd international symposium on symbolic and numeric algorithms for scientific computing (SYNASC) (pp. 161–168). Timisoara, Romania: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016a). The Writing Pal: A writing strategy tutor. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 204–224). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Kim, M., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Automated summarization evaluation (ASE) using natural language processing tools. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference of artificial intelligence in education (AIED), lecture notes in computer science (vol. 11625, pp. 84–95). Chicago, IL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). To aggregate or not? Linguistic features in automatic essay scoring and feedback systems. The Journal of Writing Assessment, 8(1), 1–16. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319604495_To_Aggregate_or_Not_Linguistic_Features_in_Automatic_Essay_Scoring_and_Feedback_Systems
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016b). The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Developing component scores from natural language processing tools to assess human ratings of essay quality. In W. Eberle & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th international Florida artificial intelligence research society (FLAIRS) conference (pp. 381–386). Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). What is successful writing? An investigation into the multiple ways writers can write high quality essays. Written Communication, 31(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314526354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Sirbu, M. D., Dascalu, M., Barnes, T., Lynch, C. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Modeling math success using cohesion network analysis. In C. P. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, & B. D. Boulay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2018), part II (pp. 63–67). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dascalu, M., Crossley, S. A., McNamara, D. S., Dessus, P., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2018a). Please Readerbench this text: A multi-dimensional textual complexity assessment framework. In S. Craig (Ed.), Tutoring and intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 251–271). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://research.ou.nl/en/publications/please-readerbench-this-text-a-multi-dimensional-textual-complexi
   Google Scholar
• Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Trausan-Matu, S., & Allen, L. K. (2018b). Cohesion network analysis of CSCL participation. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0888-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., McNamara, D. S., & Dessus, P. (2015). ReaderBench – Automated evaluation of collaboration based on cohesion and dialogism. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9226-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascalu, M. D., Ruseti, S., Carabas, M., Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., & McNamara, D. S. (2020a). Cohesion network analysis: Predicting course grades and generating sociograms for a Romanian moodle course. In 16th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (ITS 2020). Athens, Greece: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dascalu, M.-D., Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2020b). Multi-document cohesion network analysis: Visualizing intratextual and intertextual links. In I. Ibert Bittencourt, M. Cukorova, K. Muldner, E. Millan, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2020). Ifrane, Morocco: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, S. M., McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Polson, P. G., & Clawson, D. M. (1992). Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11413260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Wiemer-Hastings, P., & Kreuz, R., & the Tutoring Research Group. (1999). AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(99)00005-4
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing-to-read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., Clawson, D. M., McNamara, D. S., Marmie, W. R., Schneider, V. I., Rickard, T. C., Crutcher, R. J., King, C., Ericsson, K. A., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (1993). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 135–164). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., & McNamara, D. S. (1996). Verbal learning and memory: Does the modal model still work? Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., Schneider, V. I., & Bourne, L. E., Jr. (2012). Empirically valid principles of training. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne Jr. (Eds.), Training cognition: Optimizing efficiency, durability, and generalizability (pp. 13–39). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. G., Boonthum, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Natural language processing and game-based practice in iSTART. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(2), 189–208. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42009/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). The motivation and mastery cycle framework: Predicting long-term benefits of educational games. In Y. Baek (Ed.), Game-based learning: Theory, strategies and performance outcomes (pp. 97–122). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Guerrero, T. A., Tighe, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). iSTART-ALL: Confronting adult low literacy with intelligent tutoring for reading comprehension. In B. Boulay, R. Baker, & E. Andre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED) (pp. 125–136). Wuhan, China: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. M., Perret, C. A., Watanabe, M., Kopp, K., McCarthy, K. S., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Adaptive literacy instruction in iSTART and W-Pal: Implementing the outer loop. In S. Craig (Ed.), Tutoring and intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 221–250). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2007). The organization of thinking: What functional brain imaging reveals about the neuroarchitecture of complex cognition. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(3), 153–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.3.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levinstein, I. B., Boonthum, C., Pillarisetti, S. P., Bell, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). iSTART 2: Improvements for efficiency and effectiveness. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of writing research. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Todaro, S., Millis, K. K., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Kim, H. J., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.2190/1LN8-7BQE-8TN0-M91L
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Likens, A. D., Johnson, A. M., Guerrero, T. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2018). Metacognitive overload! Positive and negative effects of metacognitive prompts in an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0164-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, K. S., Watanabe, M., Dai, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2020b). Personalized learning in iSTART: Past modifications and future design. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1716201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Cognition in education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (1995). Effects of prior knowledge on the generation advantage: Calculators versus calculation to learn simple multiplication. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2009). The importance of teaching reading strategies. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 35, 34–40. https://www.dropbox.com/s/60hmkbyq82n36zu/152_Teaching%20Reading%20Strategies%20-%20McNamara.pdf?dl=0
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational methods to extract meaning from text and advance theories of human cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2013). The epistemic stance between the author and reader: A driving force in the cohesion of text and writing. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2017). Self-explanation and reading strategy training (SERT) improves low-knowledge students’ science course performance. Discourse Processes, 54(7), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1101328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2020). If integration is the keystone of comprehension: Inferencing is the key. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1788323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Allen, L. K. (2017). Toward an integrated perspective of writing as a discourse process. In M. Schober, A. Britt, & D. N. Rapp (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 362–389). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Dascalu, M., & Perret, C. A. (2017). Natural language processing and learning analytics. In G. Siemens & C. Lang (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics and educational data mining (pp. 93–104). Society for Learning Analytics Research.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Allen, L. K., McCarthy, K. S., & Balyan, R. (2018). NLP: Getting computers to understand discourse. In K. Millis, D. Long, J. Magliano, & K. Wiemer (Eds.), Deep comprehension: Multi-disciplinary approaches (pp. 224–236). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I. B., & Millis, K. (2007a). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. In T. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 227–241). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & McCarthy, P. M. (2010a). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication, 27(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & Roscoe, R. D. (2013). Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & Dai, J. (2015). A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring. Assessing Writing, 23, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., & Louwerse, M. M. (2012). Sources of text difficulty: Across genres and grades. In J. P. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 89–116). Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995a). A generation advantage for multiplication skill and nonword vocabulary acquisition. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne Jr. (Eds.), Learning and memory of knowledge and skills (pp. 132–169). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Healy, A. F. (1995b). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(3), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010b). Intelligent tutoring and games (ITaG). In Y. K. Baek (Ed.), Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role-playing as a motivator of study (pp. 44–65). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., Snow, E. L., & Allen, L. K. (2015b). From generating in the lab to tutoring systems in classrooms. American Journal of Psychology, 128(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kendeou, P. (2011). Translating advances in reading comprehension research to educational practice. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 33–46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281894454_Translating_advances_in_reading_comprehension_research_to_educational_practice
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from text: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Levinstein, I. B., & Boonthum, C. (2004). iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195567
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & O’Reilly, T. (2009). Theories of comprehension skill: Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. In A. M. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 1–24). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T., Best, R., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students‘ reading comprehension with Istart. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T., Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., & Levinstein, I. B. (2007b). iSTART: A web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 397–421). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 229–257. https://www.pegem.net/dosyalar/dokuman/138547-2014010711325-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Millis, K., Magliano, J., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Todaro, S., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Assessing and improving comprehension with latent semantic analysis. In T. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 207–225). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nicula, B., Perret, C. A., Dascalu, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Predicting multi-document comprehension: Cohesion network analysis. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference of artificial intelligence in education (AIED) (pp. 358–369). Chicago, IL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nicula, B., Perret, C. A., Dascalu, M., & McNamara, D. S. (2020). Extended multi-document cohesion network analysis centered on comprehension prediction. In I. Ibert Bittencourt, M. Cukorova, K. Muldner, E. Millan, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2020). Ifrane, Morocco: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Paraschiv, I. C., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., Trausan-Matu, S., & Banica, C. K. (2017). Exploring the LAK dataset using cohesion network analysis. In D. Trandabat & D. Gifu (Eds.), 3rd workshop on social media and the web of linked data (RUMOUR 2017), in conjunction with the joint conference on digital libraries (JCLD 2017) (pp. 17–21). “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Proske, A., Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: Effects on motivation and achievement. Education Technology Research Development, 62(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Contrasting writing practice formats in a writing strategy tutoring system. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(3), 723–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118763429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., Weston, J. L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2014). The Writing Pal intelligent tutoring system: Usability testing and development. Computers and Composition, 34, 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2014.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Jacovina, M. E., Harry, D., Russell, D. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Partial verbal redundancy in multimedia presentations for writing strategy instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(5), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Writing Pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1010–1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Snow, E. L., Allen, L. K., & McNamara, D. S. (2015b). Automated detection of essay revising patterns: Application for intelligent feedback in a writing tutor. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 10(1), 59–79. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED565460.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Snow, E. L., Brandon, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013a). Educational game enjoyment, perceptions, and features in an intelligent writing tutor. In C. Boonthum-Denecke & G. M. Youngblood (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th international Florida artificial intelligence research society (FLAIRS) conference (pp. 515–520). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., Varner (Allen), L. K., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2013b). Developing pedagogically-guided threshold algorithms for intelligent automated essay feedback. In International journal of learning technology (Vol. 8, pp. 362–381). Int. J. Learning Technology. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED585772.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., Johnson, A., McNamara, D. S., Balyan, R., Kopp, K., Crossley, S. A., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2018b). Predicting question quality using recurrent neural networks. In C. P. Rosé, R. Martínez-Maldonado, U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, & B. D. Boulay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international conference on artificial intelligence in education (AIED 2018), part I (pp. 491–502). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruseti, S., Dascalu, M., Johnson, A. M., McNamara, D. S., Balyan, R., McCarthy, K. S., & Trausan-Matu, S. (2018a). Scoring summaries using recurrent neural networks. In R. Nkambou, R. Azevedo, & J. Vassileva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference on intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) (pp. 191–201). Montreal, Canada: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, E. L., Jacovina, M. E., Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). iSTART-2: A reading comprehension and strategy instruction tutor. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.), Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 104–121). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe, M., McCarthy, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2019). Examining the effects of adaptive task selection on students’ motivation in an intelligent tutoring system. In S. Hsiao, J. Cunningham, K. McCarthy, G. Lynch, N. Hoover, C. Brooks, R. Ferguson, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Companion proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK’19) (pp. 161–162). Phoenix, AZ: SOLAR.
   Google Scholar