HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE TAKING AND THE SELF IN ONLINE COMMUNITY DISCUSSIONS

References

• Barton, K. C., & McCully, A. W. (2005). History, identity, and the school curriculum in Northern Ireland: An empirical study of secondary students’ ideas and perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 85–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000266070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, R., & Yussen, S. (2011). Practices of productive adult book clubs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Depending on my mood: Mood-driven influences on text comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 562. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordo, S. (2013). The creation of Anne Boleyn: A new look at England’s most notorious queen. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, T. (2016). The private lives of the Tudors: Uncovering the secrets of Britain’s greatest dynasty. Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. (2008). Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have? Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(2), 130–146. h ttp:// ww w.socstrpr.o rg/?page_id=6 92
   Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, R. (2008). The Hollywood historical film. Wiley–Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, A. C., Zaromb, F. M., Lyle, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Using popular films to enhance classroom learning: The good, the bad, and the interesting. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02410.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, C. (2019). Katherine Howard: England’s slandered queen. The History Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface Approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby, S. R. (2010). Contextualization and historical empathy: Seventh-graders’ interpretations of primary documents. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 8(1&2), 69–83. http://www.socstrpr.org/?page_id=692
   Google Scholar
• Coppa, F. (2008). Women, Star Trek, and the early development of fannish vidding. Transformative Works and Cultures, 1. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2008.044
   Google Scholar
• De Lisle, L. (2013). Tudor: Passion. Manipulation. Murder. The Story of England’s Most Notorious Royal Family. Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, D., Alias, N., Siraj, S., & Zakaria, A. R. (2014). Interactions in online forums: A case study among first year undergraduate students. Frontiers in Education, 2(1), 6–13. https://eprints.um.edu.my/9489/
   Google Scholar
• Doppen, F. H. (2000). Teaching and learning multiple perspectives: The atomic bomb. The Social Studies, 91(4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377990009602461
   Google Scholar
• Doran, S., & Freeman, T. (Eds.). (2009). Tudors and Stuarts on film: Historical perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, M. T. (1995, April). Doing history in a fifth-grade classroom: Perspective taking and historical thinking. In American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, San Franciso (pp. 18-22).
   Google Scholar
• Endacott, J. L. (2010). Reconsidering affective engagement in historical empathy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(1), 6–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473415
   Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Keysar, B., Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 327. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2004-18348-004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, T. (1998). Deconstructing Differences in African-American and European-American Adolescents’ Perspectives on U.S. History. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(2), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205051060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Wang, C., & Sun, Y. (2009). A new model of productive online discussion and its implications for research and instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 2(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0201.05
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (2014). Internet-based communication. Discourse Processes, 51(5–6), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.916174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T. (2013). “It’s in My Veins”: Identity and Disciplinary Practice in Students’ Discussions of a Historical Issue. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.757265
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, T., Schwarz, B. B., & Porat, D. (2011). “Could they do it differently?”: Narrative and argumentative changes in students’ writing following discussion of “hot” historical issues. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.556832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, E., & Wineburg, S. (2012). Between veritas and communitas: Epistemic switching in the reading of academic and sacred history. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 84–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.582376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, U., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008). Historical perspective taking: A standardized measure for an aspect of student’s historical thinking. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, K. J., & Klin, C. M. (2020). Do readers remember what story characters remember? Discourse Processes, 57(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1571782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijgen, T., Van Boxtel, C., van de Grift, W., & Holthuis, P. (2014). Testing elementary and secondary school student’s ability to perform historical perspective taking: The constructing of valid and reliable measure instruments. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(4), 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-014-0219-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2007). Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels. Computers & Education, 48(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, K. (2016). Sensitive and controversial issues in the classroom: Teaching history in a divided society. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1023027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S. (2017). Preparing to teach a slavery past: History teachers and educators as navigators of historical distance. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1213677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of other’s knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational researcher, 28(2), 16–46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002016
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Cummings, A., & Youmans, M. (2020). Is reasoning a fruitful path to changing minds? Discourse Processes, 57(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1646566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyngäs, H. (2020). Inductive content analysis. In: H. Kyngäs, K. Mikkonen, M. Kääriäinen (Eds.), The application of content analysis in nursing science research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., & Ashby, R. (2001). Empathy, perspective taking, and rational understanding. In O. L. Davis, E. A. Yeager Jr., & S. J. Foster (Eds.), Historical empathy and perspective taking in the social studies (pp. 21–50). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., Dickinson, A., & Ashby, R. (1997). “Just another emperor”: Understanding action in the past. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)89731-5
   Google Scholar
• Loncar, M., Barrett, N. E., & Liu, G.-Z. (2014). Towards the refinement of forum and asynchronous online discussion in educational contexts worldwide: Trends and investigative approaches within a dominant research paradigm. Computers & Education, 73, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the social processes and content entrained by narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A. S., Paxton, R. J., & Meyerson, P. (2006). “The reality of it all”: History students read the movies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(4), 516–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473320
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. C. (2016). Historical inquiry in an informal fan community: Online source usage and the TV show The Tudors. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 4–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1112285
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. C. (2018). A past that never was: historical poaching in Game of Thrones fans’ Tumblr practices. Popular Communication, 16(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2018.1453070
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. C. (2020). Media Literacy as an Internal and External Process. A Response to “Red States, Blue States, and Media Literacy: Political Context and Media Literacy”. Democracy and Education, 28 (1), Article 7. https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol28/iss1/7
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. C. (2021). Dominant Narratives and Historical Perspective in Time Travel Stories: A Case Study of Doctor Who. The Social Studies, 112(2), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1829527
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, J. (2019). Conversation analysis and online interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin, R. (2019). ‘You Think You Know a Story…’: Reframing the Tudors on Television in the Twenty-First Century. Adaptation, 12(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/adaptation/apy006
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2010). Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical discourse studies, 7(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2010.511832
   Google Scholar
• Nami, F., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Wikis as discussion forums: Exploring students’ contribution and their attention to form. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.770036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, A. P. (2016). Navigating windows into past human minds: A framework of shifting selves in historical perspective taking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 372–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1160830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrill, S., & Robison, W. B. (2013). The Tudors on Film and Television. McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T., Warren, A., & Lester, J. N. (2016). Applying conversation analysis methods to online talk: A literature review. Discourse, Context & Media, 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2016.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge (Vol. 360). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Gilovich, T., & Ross, L. (2004). Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder: Divergent Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781–799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radway, J. A. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radway, J. A. (1997). A feeling for books. The book‐of‐the‐month club, literary taste, and middle‐class desire. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Hinze, S. R., Slaten, D. G., & Horton, W. S. (2014). Amazing stories: Acquiring and avoiding inaccurate information from fiction. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robison, W. B. (Ed.). (2017). History, fiction, and the Tudors: Sex, politics, power, and artistic license in the Showtime television series. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Royzman, E. B., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). “I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, G. (2017). Young & damned & fair: The life and tragedy of Catherine Howard at the Court of Henry VIII. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, S. (2020). The Afterlife of Anne Boleyn. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, M. (2017). Erasing differences for the sake of inclusion: How Mexican/Mexican American students construct historical narratives. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 43–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1211971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer Bassani, P. B. (2011). Interpersonal exchanges in discussion forums: A study of learning communities in distance learning settings. Computers & Education, 56(4), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwebel, S. L. (2011). Child sized history: Fictions of the past in U.S. classrooms. Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seixas, P. (1994). Confronting the moral frames of popular film: Young people respond to historical revisionism. American Journal of Education, 102(3), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/444070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. (2020). Talk about evidence during argumentation. Discourse Processes, 57(9), 770–792. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1777498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Reader’s reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudini, V. (2015). Extending prior posts in dyadic online text chat. Discourse Processes, 52(8), 642–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.969138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twomey, S. (2007). Reading “woman”: Book club pedagogies and the literary imagination. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 398–407. https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1598/JAAL.50.5.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, A. E. (2017). “You excluded us for so long and now you want us to be patriotic?”: African American Women Teachers Navigating the Quandary of Citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(3), 318–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1282387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, H.-C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college student’s perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. C., Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Think unto others: The self-destructive impact of negative racial stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S., Mosborg, S., Porat, D., & Duncan, A. (2007). Forrest Gump and the Future of Teaching the Past. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170708900305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubernis, L., & Larsen, K. (2012). Fandom at the crossroads: Celebration, shame and fan/producer relationships. Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar