References
- Abadi, D., Arnaldo, I., & Fischer, A. (2021). Anxious and angry: Emotional Responses to the COVID-19 threat. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.676116
- Aguilar, S. J., Polikoff, M. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019). Refutation texts: A new approach to changing public misconceptions about education policy. Educational Researcher, 48(5), 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x19849416
- Alahäivälä, T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2016). Understanding persuasion contexts in health gamification: A systematic analysis of gamified health behavior change support systems literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 96, 62–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.006
- Baram-Tsabari, A., & Schejter, A. M. (2019). New media: A double-edged sword in support of public engagement with science. In Y. Kali, A. Baram-Tsabari, & A. M. Schejter (Eds.), Learning in a networked society (pp. 79–95). Springer.
- Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Good news about bad news: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), Article 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.91
- Brashier, N. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2020). Aging in an era of fake news. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 316–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420915872
- Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 529–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9274-x
- Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021). Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 980–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3
- Carey, J. M., Chi, V., Flynn, D., Nyhan, B., & Zeitzoff, T. (2020). The effects of corrective information about disease epidemics and outbreaks: Evidence from Zika and yellow fever in Brazil. Science Advances, 6(5), eaaw7449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7449
- Chi, M. T. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61–82). Routledge.
- Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020). The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5
- D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
- Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining” gamification”. Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, 9–15.
- Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis—An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(2), 193–216. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01668-9
- Flemming, D., Kimmerle, J., Cress, U., & Sinatra, G. M. (2020, January). Research is tentative, but that’s okay: Overcoming misconceptions about scientific tentativeness through refutation texts. Discourse Processes, 57(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2019.1629805
- Foster, M. I., & Keane, M. T. (2019). The role of Surprise in learning: Different surprising outcomes affect memorability differentially. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12392
- Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
- Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2021). Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(4), e0249596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249596
- Götz, F. M., Gosling, S. D., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483
- Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), eaau4586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586
- Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford University Press.
- Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
- Han, J., Cha, M., & Lee, W. (2020). Anger contributes to the spread of covid-19 misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-39
- Harper, C. A., Satchell, L. P., Fido, D., & Latzman, R. D. (2021). Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19, 1875–1888. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5
- Heddy, B. C., Danielson, R. W., Sinatra, G. M., & Graham, J. (2017). Modifying knowledge, emotions, and attitudes regarding genetically modified foods. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 513–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1260523
- Hofmann, S., Räckers, M., Beverungen, D., & Becker, J. (2013). Old blunders in new media? How local governments communicate with citizens in online social networks. 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2023–2032.
- Hynd, C. R. (2001). Refutational texts and the change process. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(7–8), 699–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00010-1
- Jungmann, S. M., & Witthoft, M. (2020). Health anxiety, cyberchondria, and coping in the current COVID-19 pandemic: Which factors are related to coronavirus anxiety? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 73, Article 102239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102239
- Kaplan, J. T., Gimbel, S. I., Dehghani, M., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Sagae, K., Wong, J. D., Tipper, C. M., Damasio, H., Gordon, A. S., & Damasio, A. (2016). Processing narratives concerning protected values: A cross-cultural investigation of neural correlates. Cerebral Cortex, 27(2), 1428–1438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv325
- Kendeou, P., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., & Van Boekel, M. (2019). Knowledge revision through the lenses of the three-pronged approach. Memory & Cognition, 47(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0848-y
- Kendeou, P., O’Brien, E. J. (2014). The knowledge revision components (KReC) framework: Processes and mechanisms. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 353–377). Boston Review.
- Kendeou, P., Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2013). Updating during reading comprehension: Why causality matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 854–865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029468
- Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014
- Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798
- LeBel, E. P., Campbell, L., & Loving, T. J. (2017). Benefits of open and high-powered research outweigh costs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 230–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000049
- Li, H. O.-Y., Bailey, A., Huynh, D., & Chan, J. (2020). YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: A pandemic of misinformation? BMJ Global Health, 5(5), e002604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
- Lombardi, D., Danielson, R. W., & Young, N. (2016). A plausible connection: Models examining the relations between evaluation, plausibility, and the refutation text effect. Learning and Instruction, 44, 74–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.03.003
- Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1–16. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315
- Manning, C., & Clayton, S. (2018). Threats to mental health and wellbeing associated with climate change. In C. Manning & S. Clayton (Eds.), Psychology and climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses (pp. 217–244). Elsevier.
- Mason, L., Baldi, R., Di Ronco, S., Scrimin, S., Danielson, R. W., & Sinatra, G. M. (2017). Textual and graphical refutations: Effects on conceptual change learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 275–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.03.007
- Muis, K. R., Sinatra, G. M., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., Trevors, G., Losenno, K. M., & Munzar, B. (2018). Main and moderator effects of refutation on task value, epistemic emotions, and learning strategies during conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 155–165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.10.001
- Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., & Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
- Muis, K. R., Etoubashi, N., & Denton, C. A. (2020). The catcher in the lie: The role of emotions and epistemic judgments in changing students’ misconceptions and attitudes in a post-truth era. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62. Article 101898. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101898
- Mullins, J. K., & Sabherwal, R. (2018). Beyond enjoyment: A cognitive-emotional perspective of gamification. Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1237–1246. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/50039
- Nauroth, P., Gollwitzer, M., Bender, J., & Rothmund, T. (2014). Gamers against science: The case of the violent video games debate. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1998
- Nauroth, P., Gollwitzer, M., Bender, J., & Rothmund, T. (2015). Social identity threat motivates science-discrediting online comments. PloS one, 10(2), e0117476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117476
- Neill, R. D., Blair, C., Best, P., McGlinchey, E., & Armour, C. (2021). Media consumption and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown: A UK cross-sectional study across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Journal of Public Health, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01506-0
- Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
- Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912440117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912440117
- Pan, W., Liu, D., & Fang, J. (2021). An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268
- Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
- Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
- Pew. (2021). Those on ideological right favor fewer COVID-19 restrictions in most advanced economies. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/30/those-on-ideological-right-favor-fewer-covid-19-restrictions-in-most-advanced-economies/
- Pieschl, S., Budd, J., Thomm, E., & Archer, J. (2021). Effects of raising student teachers’ metacognitive awareness of their educational psychological misconceptions. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 20, 214–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725721996223
- Prinz, A., Golke, S., & Wittwer, J. (2019). Refutation Texts Compensate for Detrimental Effects of Misconceptions on Comprehension and Metacomprehension Accuracy and Support Transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 957–981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000329
- Renström, E. A., & Bäck, H. (2021). Emotions during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Fear, anxiety, and anger as mediators between threats and policy support and political actions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(8), 861–877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12806
- Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
- Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
- Sardi, L., Idri, A., & Fernández-Alemán, J. L. (2017). A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71, 31–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.011
- Schroeder, N. L., & Kucera, A. C. (2022). Refutation text facilitates learning: A meta-analysis of between-subjects experiments. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 957–987. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09656-z
- Sharot, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (2020). How people decide what they want to know. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1
- Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 503–524). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.
- Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
- Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2015). Warm change about hot topics: The role of motivation and emotion in attitude and conceptual change about controversial science topics. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–256). Routledge.
- Smith, L. E., Duffy, B., Moxham-Hall, V., Strang, L., Wessely, S., & Rubin, G. J. (2021). Anger and confrontation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey in the UK. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 114(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076820962068
- Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 223, 205–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000222
- Suldovsky, B. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of the public deficit always return? Exploring key influences. Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629750
- Suldovsky, B. (2017). The information deficit model and climate change communication. In H. von Storch (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.301
- Tangcharoensathien, V., Calleja, N., Nguyen, T., Purnat, T., D’Agostino, M., Garcia-Saiso, S., Landry, M., Rashidian, A., Hamilton, C., & AbdAllah, A. (2020). Framework for managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Methods and results of an online, crowdsourced WHO technical consultation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e19659. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/19659
- Thacker, I., Sinatra, G. M., Muis, K. R., Danielson, R. W., Pekrun, R., Winne, P. H., & Chevrier, M. (2020, August). Using persuasive refutation texts to prompt attitudinal an conceptual change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1085–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu000434
- Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
- Trevors, G. J., Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., & Winne, P. H. (2016). Identity and epistemic emotions during knowledge revision: A potential account for the backfire effect. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 339–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2015.1136507
- Trevors, G., Kendeou, P., & Butterfuss, R. (2017). Emotion processes in knowledge revision. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 406–426. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2017.1312201
- Trevors, G. J., & Duffy, M. C. (2020). Correcting COVID-19 misconceptions requires caution. Educational Researcher, 49(7), 538–542. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20953825
- Trevors, G. (2021). The roles of identity conflict, emotion, and threat in learning from refutation texts on vaccination and immigration. Discourse Processes, 59(1–2), 36–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2021.1917950
- van der Linden, S. (2019). Countering science denial. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(9), 889–890. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0631-5
- Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00038-4
- Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85(3), 423–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564
- Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-Checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
- WHO. (2020). Munich Security Conference, 15 February 2020. Retrieved May 24, 2022, from https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/munich-security-conference
- WHO. (2021). Infodemic. Retrieved September 10, 2021, from https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic
- Yang, K.-C., Pierri, F., Hui, P.-M., Axelrod, D., Torres-Lugo, C., Bryden, J., & Menczer, F. (2021). The COVID-19 infodemic: Twitter versus Facebook. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 20539517211013861. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013861