Sounding others’ sensations in interaction

References

• Anikin, A., & Lima, C. F. (2018). Perceptual and acoustic differences between authentic and acted nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 622–641. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1270976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (M. Holquist, ed. Trans. C Emerson & M Holquist). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1986). ‘I show how you feel’: Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2006). Little words that matter: Discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broth, M., & Keevallik, L. (eds). (2020). Multimodal Interaktionsanalys. Studentliterattur.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarutti, M. (2020) The Multimodal and Sequential Design of Co-Animation as a Practice for Association in English Interaction. Doctoral thesis. University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2016). Touch as social control: Haptic organization of attention in adult–child interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2017). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S. (eds). (2015). Temporality in Interaction. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., Mondada, L., & Doehler, S. P. (2021). Early responses: An introduction. Discourse Processes, 58(4), 293–307. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1877516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2017). Brain-to-brain interfaces and the role of language in distributing agency. In N. J. Enfield & P. Kockelman (Eds.) Distributed Agency (pp. 59–66). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2018). Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M. (2020). Between sound and speech: Liminal signs in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1),188–196. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018) Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press. Retrieved October 29, 2020, from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/linguistic-bodies
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3),359–410. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1990). Empathy: Conceptualization, measurement, and relation to prosocial behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield N. J. (2017). Elements of agency. In N. J. Enfield & P. Kockelman (Eds.), Distributed agency (p. 3-8). Oxford University Press. Retrieved January 14, 2021, from https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190457204.001.0001/acprof-9780190457204
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W., & Vom Lehn, D. (2020). Seeing as accountable action: The interactional accomplishment of sensorial work. Current Sociology, 68(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119857460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1993). Recording human interaction in natural settings. Pragmatics, 3(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.3.2.05goo
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of Aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagins, M., & Lamberg, E. M. (2006). Natural breath control during lifting tasks: Effect of load. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 96(4), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-005-0097-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haviland, J. (2007). Master speakers, master gesturers: A string quartet master class. In S. Duncan, E. Levy, & J. Cassell (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. 147–172). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52(2), 113. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C. (2002). Demonstrative suffering: The gestural (re)embodiment of symptoms. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 597–616. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Stivers, T. (1999). Online commentary in acute medical visits: A method of shaping patient expectations. Social Science & Medicine, 49(11), 1501–1517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00219-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation (pp. 159–183). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E. (2020). Nonlexical “moans”: Response cries in board game interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 42–65. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L. (2023). Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language & Communication, 88, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E., & Clift, R. (eds) (2007) Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ironside, R. (2018). Feeling spirits: Sharing subjective paranormal experience through embodied talk and action. Text & Talk, 38(6), 705–728. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari, H., Courtois, I., Van den Bergh, O., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Van Diest, I. (2017). Pain and respiration: A systematic review. Pain, 158(6), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1986). Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L. (2015). Negotiating pain: The joint construction of a child’s bodily sensation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(2), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2021). Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020b). Grammatical coordination of an embodied action: The Estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal coordinator of pilates moves. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, & J. Lindström (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp. 221–244). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R. (2020). Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. (2020a). Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a pilates class. In C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing others: Grammar and lexi within larger activities (pp. 147–173). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Küttner, U. -A. (2020). Tying sequences together with the [That’s + Wh-Clause] format: On (retro-) sequential junctures in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La, J., & Weatherall, A. (2020). Pain displays as embodied activity in medical interactions. In S. Wiggins & K. O. Cromdal (Eds.), Discursive psychology and embodiment: Beyond subject-object binaries (pp. 197–220). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp. 225–256). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 238–276). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, J., Lindholm, C., Grahn, I. L., Keevallik, L. (2020). Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities: Directives and accounts in the context of physical training. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp. 245–274). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacMartin, C., Coe, J. B., & Adams, C. L. (2014). Treating distressed animals as participants: I know responses in veterinarians’ pet-directed talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 151–174. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.900219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massery, M., Hagins, M., Stafford, R., Moerchen, V., & Hodges, P. W. (2013). Effect of airway control by glottal structures on postural stability. Journal of Applied Physiology, 115(4), 483–490. American Physiological Society. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a). Signs ( Tran. R. C. McCleary). Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). The philosopher and his shadow. In R. C. McCleary (Eds.), Signs (pp. 159–181). Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). The phenomemology of perception ( Tran. C. Smith). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2018). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618793439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019a). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2019b). Transcribing silent actions: A multimodal approach of sequence organization. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v2i1.113150
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2020). Audible sniffs: Smelling-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 140–163. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1716592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2021a). How early can embodied responses be? Issues in time and sequentiality. Discourse Processes, 58(4), 397–418. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1871561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2021b). Orchestrating multi-sensoriality in tasting sessions: Sensing bodies, normativity, and language. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2004). ’You see here ?’: Voir, pointer, dire. Contribution à une approche interactionnelle de la référence. In A. Auchlin (Ed.), Structures et Discours. Mélanges Offerts à Eddy Roulet (pp. 433–454). Nota Bene.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014b). Shooting as a research activity: The embodied production of video data. In M. Broth, E. Laurier, & L. Mondada (Eds.), Studies of video practices: Video at work (pp. 33–62). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014a). Requesting immediate action in the surgical operating room: Time, embodied resources and praxeological embeddedness. In P. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction. Studies in Language and Social Interaction (SLSI) (Vol. 26, pp. 269–302). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2017). Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action: Examples from French. In M.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative turns at talk (pp. 65–101). John Benjamins Publishing. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027265524-slsi.30.03mon
   Google Scholar
• Nakassis, C. V. (2018). Indexicality’s ambivalent ground. Signs and Society, 6(1), 281–304. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/694753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. (2017). The perceived body and embodied vision in interaction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 24(2), 110–128. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1296465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén, N., Svensson, E., & Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 20–36. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.767555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A. (eds). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, R. (2020). Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada, M. (2018). Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pehkonen, S. (2020). Response cries inviting an alignment: Finnish huh huh. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 19–41. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., & Silverman, D. (1991). Owning experience: Describing the experience of other persons. Text & Talk, 11(3), 441–480. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1991.11.3.441
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868
   Google Scholar
• Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. In Pragmatics & beyond new series (Vol. 215). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, E. (2021). Emotional intensity as a resource for moral assessments: The action of ‘incitement’ in sports settings. In J. S. Robles & A. Weatherall (Eds.), How emotions are made in talk (pp. 27–50). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, A. B. (1996). Anger In-the-Social-Order. Body & Society, 2(1), 17–30. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X96002001002
   Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. (2005). “Empathy” and “sympathy” in action: Attending to patients’ troubles in finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(3), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (G. Jefferson & E. A. Schegloff, Eds. Vol. 1-2). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(4), 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (eds). (2013). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammany, J. E., O’Connell, D. G., Latham, S. E., Rogers, J. A., Sugar, T. S. (2021). The effect of grunting on overhead throwing velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 17479541211005360. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541211005359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throop, C. J. (2010). Suffering and sentiment: Exploring the vicissitudes of experience and pain in yap. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolins, J. (2013). Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1993). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatanen, A. (2018). Responding in early overlap: Recognitional onsets in assertion sequences. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(2), 107–126. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatanen, A., Endo, T., & Yokomori, D. (2021). Cross-linguistic investigation of projection in overlapping agreements to assertions: Stance-taking as a resource for projection. Discourse processes, 58(4), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1801317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A., & Keevallik, L. (2016). When claims of understanding are less than affiliative. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1196544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherall, A., Keevallik, L., La, J., Dowell, T., & Stubbe, M. (2021). The multimodality and temporality of pain displays. Language & Communication, 80, 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, P. (1996). A rehearsal of a beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 247–290. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, P. (2002). Performative error-correction in music: A problem for ethnomethodological description. Human Studies, 25(3), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020182018989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, A. S., & Tschampl, M. (2012). Something to shout about: A simple, quick performance enhancement technique improved strength in both experts and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24(4), 418–428. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2012.688787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2002). Talking with your mouth full: Gustatory Mmms and the embodiment of pleasure. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 35(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2013). The social life of ‘eugh’: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes: Disgust as assessment in family mealtimes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02106.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S. (2019). Moments of pleasure: A preliminary classification of gustatory mmms and the enactment of enjoyment during infant mealtimes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L. (2021a). Enacting gustatory pleasure on behalf of another: The multimodal coordination of infant tasting practices. Symbolic Interaction, 44(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, S., & Keevallik, L. (2021b). Parental lip-smacks during infant mealtimes: Multimodal features and social functions. Interactional Linguistics, 1(2), 241–272. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21006.wig
   Google Scholar