Whom to believe? Fostering source evaluation skills with interleaved presentation of untrustworthy and trustworthy social media sources

References

• Abel, R. (2023a). Some fungi are not edible more than once: The impact of motivation to avoid confusion on learners’ study sequence choices. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, R. (2023b). Interleaving effects in blindfolded perceptual learning across various sensory modalities. Cognitive Science, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, R., Brunmair, M., & Weissgerber, S. C. (2021). Change one category at a time: Sequence effects beyond interleaving and blocking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(7), 1083–1105. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel, R., de Bruin, A. B. H., Onan, E., & Roelle, J. (2024). Why do learners (dis)use interleaving in learning confusable categories? The role of metastrategic knowledge and utility value of distinguishing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Abel, R., Niedling, L. M., & Hänze, M. (2020). Spontaneous inferential processing while reading interleaved expository texts enables learners to discover the underlying regularities. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., Mor-Hagani, S., Abed, F., Tal-Savir, D., Goldik, N., Talmon, I., & Davidow, O. (2023). Misinformation is contagious: Middle school students learn how to evaluate and share information responsibly through a digital game. Computers and Education, 202, 104832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104832
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., Thomm, E., & Shlomi-Elooz, T. (2020). Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 773–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2019). Teaching sourcing in upper secondary school: A comprehensive sourcing intervention with follow-up data. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(4), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J.-F., Blaum, D., & Millis, K. K. (2019). A reasoned approach to dealing with fake news. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218814855
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048224.017
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163–193). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511691904.006
   Google Scholar
• Brunmair, M., & Richter, T. (2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145(11), 1029–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, P. F., & Goldstone, R. L. (2015). What you learn is more than what you see: What can sequencing effects tell us about inductive category learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 505. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsdingen, A., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. (2011). The effects of practice schedule and critical thinking prompts on learning and transfer of a complex judgment task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, E. M., van Gog, T., van de Groep, L., de Lange, A. J., Knopper, R. L., Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2023). The role of mental effort in students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of interleaved and blocked study strategies and their willingness to use them. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), Article 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09797-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaswal, V. K., & Malone, L. S. (2007). Turning believers into skeptics: 3-year-olds’ sensitivity to cues to speaker credibility. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370701446392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning painting styles: Spacing is advantageous when it promotes discriminative contrast. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Hagerman, M. S. (2023). Examining the structure of credibility evaluation when sixth graders read online texts. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(3), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019). Perceiving effort as poor learning: The misinterpreted-effort hypothesis of how experienced effort and perceived learning relate to study strategy choice. Cognitive Psychology, 115, 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, M. A., & Harris, P. L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers. Child Development, 76(6), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00849.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescarret, C., Magnier, J., Le Floch, V., Sakdavong, J.-C., Boucheix, J.-M., & Amadieu, F. (2023). “Because I agree with him”: The impact of middle-school students’ prior attitude on the evaluation of source credibility when watching videos. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00678-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescarret, C., Magnier, J., Le Floch, V., Sakdavong, J.-C., Boucheix, J.-M., & Amadieu, F. (2024). Do you trust this speaker? The impact of prompting on middle-school students’ consideration of source when watching conflicting videos. Instructional Science, 52(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09637-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likourezos, V., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2019). The variability effect: When instructional variability is advantageous. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09462-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., Richter, T., & Britt, M. A. (2018). Cognitive processes underlying the text-belief consistency effect: An eye-movement study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, L., & Lipowsky, F. (2023). The role of prior knowledge and need for cognition for the effectiveness of interleaved and blocked practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00723-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, L., Werker, K., Arend, J., & Lipowsky, F. (2021). Fostering the acquisition of subtraction strategies with interleaved practice: An intervention study with German third graders. Learning and Instruction, 71, 101354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters institute digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. CID: 20.500.12592/9dhxj5. Retrieved January 10, 2024 https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2023-06/Digital_News_Report_2023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Onan, E., Wiradhany, W., Biwer, F., Janssen, E. M., & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2022). Growing out of the experience: How subjective experiences of effort and learning influence the use of interleaved practice. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2451–2484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09692-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S. C., Lovelett, J., Phun, V., & Rickard, T. C. (2019). The synergistic benefits of systematic and random interleaving for second language grammar learning. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(4), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, J., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J., & Stadtler, M. (2017). Why attend to source information when reading online? The perspective of ninth grade students from two different countries. Computers and Education, 113, 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2018). Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S., & Sivyer, D. 2021. Secondary students’ epistemic thinking and year as predictors of critical source evaluation of Internet blogs. Computers and Education, 160, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porsch, T., & Bromme, R. (2010). Which science disciplines are pertinent? Impact of epistemological beliefs on students’ choices. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 636–642). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Potocki, A., de Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Macedo-Rouet, M., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). The development of source evaluation skills during adolescence: Exploring different levels of source processing and their relationships. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1), 19–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Burgess, K. (2014). The benefit of interleaved mathematics practice is not limited to superficially similar kinds of problems. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(5), 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0588-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sana, F., Yan, V. X., Kim, J. A., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2018). Does working memory capacity moderate the interleaving benefit? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, L., Roelle, J., Saalbach, H., Berthold, K., Stern, E., & Renkl, A. (2020). Providing worked examples for learning multiple principles. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. M., & Rohrer, D. (2009). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderbilt, K. E., Liu, D., & Heyman, G. D. (2011). The development of distrust. Child Development, 82(5), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01629.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the world wide web for information. Computers and Education, 52(1), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertgen, A. G., Richter, T., & Rouet, J. (2021). The role of source credibility in the validation of information depends on the degree of (im-)plausibility. Discourse Processes, 58(5–6), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853x.2021.1881342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintterlin, F., Hendriks, F., Mede, N. G., Bromme, R., Metag, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021). Predicting public trust in science: The role of basic orientations toward science, perceived trustworthiness of scientists, and experiences with science. Frontiers in Communication, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757
   Google Scholar
• Yan, V. X., Soderstrom, N. C., Seneviratna, G. S., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2017). How should exemplars be sequenced in inductive learning? Empirical evidence versus learners’ opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(4), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkiply, N., McLean, J., Burt, J. S., & Bath, D. (2012). Spacing and induction: Application to exemplars presented as auditory and visual text. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar