Does the gender asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) as a special form of gender-fair language impair comprehensibility?

References

• Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, C., & Klimmt, C. (2010). Geschlechtergerechte Formulierungen in Nachrichtentexten [Gender-fair references in news stories]. Publizistik, 55(3), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-010-0093-2
   Google Scholar
• Blaubergs, M. S. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 3(2–3), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb01101.x
   Google Scholar
• Braun, F., Oelkers, S., Rogalski, K., Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2007). “Aus Gründen der Verständlichkeit … ”: Der Einfluss maskuliner und alternativer Personenbezeichnungen auf die kognitive Verarbeitung von Texten [“For reasons of comprehensibility … ”: How masculine generics and alternative forms affect the cognitive processing of a text]. Psychologische Rundschau, 58(3), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042.58.3.183
   Google Scholar
• Braun, F., Sczesny, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2005). Cognitive effects of masculine generics in German: An overview of empirical findings. Communications, 30(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2005.30.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Collins-Thompson, K. (2014). Computational assessment of text readability: A survey of current and future research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 165(2), 97–135.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Greenfield, J., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing text readability using psycholinguistic indices. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFranza, D., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2020). How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diewald, G., & Steinhauer, A. (2020). Handbuch geschlechtergerechte Sprache – Wie Sie angemessen und verständlich gendern [Handbook on gender-fair language – How to use it appropriately and comprehensibly]. Duden.
   Google Scholar
• Esaulova, Y., & von Stockhausen, L. (2015). Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1356). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01356
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G. (2017). Textverständlichkeit und ihre Messung [ Text comprehensibility and its measurement]. Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G., Drößler, V., Oberlehberg, N., & Heise, E. (2021). The influence of the gender asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) on comprehensibility and interest. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(5934). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760062
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G., Hagenberg, K., & Heise, E. (2022, July). Does the gender asterisk (“Gendersternchen”) as a special form of gender-fair language impair comprehensibility? [Paper presentation]. 32nd Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse (ST&D), online.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G., & Heise, E. (2019). Does the use of gender-fair language influence the comprehensibility of texts? An experiment using an authentic contract manipulating single role nouns and pronouns. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 78(1–2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G., & Heise, E. (2022). The influence of comprehensibility on interest and comprehension. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, M. C. G., Muselick, J., & Heise, E. (2022). Does the use of gender-fair language impair the comprehensibility of video lectures? – An experiment using an authentic video lecture manipulating role nouns in German. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 21(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/147572572211073
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. (2016). Gender and linguistic sexism. In H. Giles & A. Maass (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 177–192). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, U., Gygax, P., Sarrasin, O., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2008). Au pairs are rarely male: Norms on the gender perception of role names across English, French, and German. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.1.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygax, P., & Gesto, N. (2007). Féminisation et lourder de texte [Feminisation of language and hindering reading]. Annee Psychologique, 107(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503307002059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019). A language index of grammatical gender dimensions to study the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1604). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604
   Google Scholar
• Haberlandt, K. F., & Graesser, A. C. (1985). Component processes in text comprehension and some of their interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, E. (2000). Sind Frauen mitgemeint? Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Verständnis des generischen Maskulinums und seiner Alternativen [Are women included? An empirical study on the understanding of the generic masculine and its alternatives]. Sprache & Kognition, 19(1/2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1024//0253-4533.19.12.3
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2015). Reducing women’s lack of fit with leadership positions? Effects of the wording of job advertisements. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 316–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension – A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a new model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimmt, C., Pompetzki, V., & Blake, C. (2008). Geschlechterrepräsentation in Nachrichtentexten [Representation of gender in news texts]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 56(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2008-1-3
   Google Scholar
• Körner, A., Abraham, B., Rummer, R., & Strack, F. (2022). Gender representations elicited by the gender star form. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221080181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kricheli-Katz, T., & Regev, T. (2021). The effect of language on performance: Do gendered languages fail women in maths? Science of Learning, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00087-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krome, S. (2021). Gendern zwischen Sprachpolitik, orthografischer Norm, Sprach- und Schreibgebrauch [Gendering between language policy, orthographic norm, language and spelling usage]. Sprachreport, 37(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.14618/sr-2-2021-krom
   Google Scholar
• Langer, I., Schulz von Thun, F., & Tausch, R. (1974). Sich verständlich ausdrücken [Expressing yourself comprehensibly]. E. Reinhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, A., Renström, E. A., & Gustafsson Sendén, M. (2019). Reducing a male bias in language? Establishing the efficiency of three different gender-rair language strategies. Sex Roles, 81(1–2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0974-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with coh-metrix. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misersky, J., Majid, A., & Snijders, T. M. (2019). Grammatical gender in German influences how role-nouns are interpreted: Evidence from ERPs. Discourse Processes, 56(8), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1541382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Spitzer, C. (2022, February). Wie häufig ist das sogenannte generische Maskulinum? Eine quantitativ-qualitative Auswertung von DPA-Meldungen [How frequent is the so-called generic masculine? A quantitative-qualitative evaluation of GPA reports] [Paper presentation]. Meeting for the launch of the DFG project “Genderbezogene Praktiken bei Personenreferenzen: Diskurs, Grammatik, Kognition”, online.
   Google Scholar
• Payr, F. (2022a). Aufruf: Wissenschaftler kritisieren Genderpraxis des ÖRR [Appeal: Scientists criticize gender practice of the ÖRR]. https://www.linguistik-vs-gendern.de/
   Google Scholar
• Payr, F. (2022b). Von Menschen und Mensch*innen - 20 gute Gründe mit dem Gendern aufzuhören [Of men and wo*men - 20 good reasons to stop gendering]. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36675-9
   Google Scholar
• Pöschko, H., & Prieler, V. (2018). Zur Verständlichkeit und Lesbarkeit von geschlechtergerecht formulierten Schulbuchtexten [On the comprehensibility and readability of gender-fair schoolbook texts]. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung, 8(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-017-0195-2
   Google Scholar
• Prewitt-Freilino, J. L., Caswell, T. A., & Laakso, E. K. (2012). The gendering of language: A comparison of gender equality in countries with gendered, natural gender, and genderless languages. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0083-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.Rproject.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rammstedt, B. ( Hrsg.). (2013). Grundlegende Kompetenzen Erwachsener im internationalen Vergleich: Ergebnisse von PIAAC 2012 [Basic competencies of adults in international comparison: Results from PIAAC 2012]. Waxmann. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-360687
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (2017). Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52(2), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1258173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothmund, J., & Christmann, U. (2002). Auf der Suche nach einem geschlechtergerechten Sprachgebrauch [In search of a gender-fair use of language]. Muttersprache, 112(2), 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, S., Gabriel, U., & Gygax, P. M. (2016). Altering male-dominant representations: A study on nominalized adjectives and participles in first and second language German. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(6), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15625442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, S., Gygax, P. M., & Gabriel, U. (2016). Gauging the impact of gender grammaticization in different languages: Application of a linguistic-visual paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 140. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saul, J., & Diaz-Leon, E. (2018). Feminist philosophy of language. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/feminism-language/
   Google Scholar
• Sczesny, S., Moser, F., & Wood, W. (2015). Beyond sexist beliefs: How do people decide to use gender-inclusive language? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(7), 943–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215585727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger-Loerbroks, V., & von Stockhausen, L. (2014). Mental representations of gender-fair nouns in German legal language: An eye-movement and questionnaire-based study. Linguistische Berichte, 237, 57–80. https://doi.org/10.46771/2366077500237_4
   Google Scholar
• Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211406434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vergoossen, H. P., Pärnamets, P., Renström, E. A., & Sendén, M. G. (2020). Are new gender-neutral pronouns difficult to process in reading? The case of hen in Swedish. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergoossen, H. P., Renström, E. A., Lindqvist, A., & Sendén, M. G. (2020). Four dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex Roles, 83(337), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01108-x
   Google Scholar
• Vervecken, D., Gygax, P. M., Gabriel, U., Guillod, M., & Hannover, B. (2015). Warm-hearted businessmen, competitive housewives? Effects of gender-fair language on adolescents’ perceptions of occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1437). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vervecken, D., & Hannover, B. (2015). Yes I can! Effects of gender-fair job descriptions on children’s perceptions of job status, job difficulty, and vocational self-efficacy. Social Psychology, 46(2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervecken, D., Hannover, B., & Wolter, I. (2013). Changing (s)expectations: How gender fair job descriptions impact children’s perceptions and interest regarding traditionally male occupations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharski, L., & Ferstl, E. C. (2023). Gendered representations of person referents activated by the nonbinary gender star in German: A word-picture matching task. Discourse Processes, 60(4–5), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2199531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar