Influences beyond the page: Walter Kintsch’s impact on multiple document comprehension and mentoring in research

References

• Altamura, L., Vargas, C., & Salmerón, L. (2024). Do new forms of reading pay off? A meta–analysis on the relationship between leisure digital reading habits and text comprehension. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231216463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Braasch, J. L. G., & Salmerón, L. (2020). Reading multiple and non-traditional texts: New opportunities and new challenges. In E. B. Moje, P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. K. Lesaux (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. V, pp. 79–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109–136). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Whitten, S. (2000). Book review (Walter Kintsch, comprehension: A paradigm for cognition). Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1247–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00090-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, P., Hughes, S., Magliano, J. P., Goldman, S. R., & Lawless, K. (2012). Assessing the use of multiple sources in student essays. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0214-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26(4–5), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710500285870
   Google Scholar
• Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Du, H., Wang, Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2019). Toward a typology of integration: Examining the documents model framework. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 51, 297–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Altamura, L., Delgado, P., Karagiorgi, A., & Vargas, C. (2024). Reading comprehension on handheld devices versus on paper: A narrative review and meta-analysis of the medium effect and its moderators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 116(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000830
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., & García, V. (2011). Reading skills and children’s navigation strategies in hypertext. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Kintsch, E. (2010). Self-regulation and link selection strategies in hypertext. Discourse Processes, 47(3), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonia, A. N., Magliano, J. P., McCarthy, K. S., Creer, S. D., McNamara, D. S., & Allen, L. K. (2022). Integration in multiple-document comprehension: A natural language processing approach. Discourse Processes, 59(5–6), 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2079320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar