80
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Neuroscience as a window into discourse processing: the influence of Walter Kintsch

ORCID Icon

References

  • Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
  • Egidi, G., & Caramazza, A. (2016). Integration processes compared: Cortical differences for consistency evaluation and passive comprehension in local and global coherence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1568–1583. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00982
  • Fedorenko, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2014). Reworking the language network. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18(3), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006
  • Ferstl, E. C. (2007). The functional neuroanatomy of text comprehension: What’s the story so far? In F. Schmalhofer & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 53–102). Erlbaum.
  • Ferstl, E. C. (2015). The neuroanatomy of inference processes. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 230–259). Cambridge University Press.
  • Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29(5), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20422
  • Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(5), 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053747658
  • Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(3), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00007-6
  • Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind? Neuroimage, 17(3), 1599–1612. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1247
  • Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545029
  • Friese, U., Rutschmann, R., Raabe, M., & Schmalhofer, F. (2008). Neural correlates of inference processes in text comprehension: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 2110–2124. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20141
  • Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416
  • Helder, A., van den Broek, P., Karlsson, J., & van Leijenhorst, L. (2017). Neural correlates o coherence-break detection during reading of narratives. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(6), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1332065
  • Jung-Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(11), 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009
  • Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
  • Kuperberg, G. R., Lakshmanan, B. M., Caplan, D. N., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. Neuroimage, 33(1), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.001
  • Lipkin, B., Tuckute, G., Affourtit, J., Small, H., Mineroff, Z., Kean, H., Jouravlev, O., Rakocevic, L., Pritchett, B., Siegelman, M., & Hoeflin, C. (2002). Probabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals. Scientific Data, 9(1), 529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01645-3
  • Maguire, E. A., Frith, C. D., & Morris, R. G. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122(10), 1839–1850. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.10.1839
  • Mar, R. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 103–134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145406
  • Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2004). How the brain processes causal inferences in text. Psychological Science, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501001.x
  • Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2006). Neuroimaging contributions to the understanding of discourse processes. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 765–799). Elsevier.
  • Mazoyer, B. M., Tzourio, N., Frak, V., Syrota, A., Murayama, N., Levrier, O., Salamon, G., Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1993). The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.467
  • Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. A., Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33468
  • Poldrack, R. A., Baker, C. I., Durnez, J., Gorgolewski, K. J., Matthews, P. M., Munafò, M. R., Nichols, T. E., Poline, J.-B., Vul, E., & Yarkoni, T. (2017). Scanning the horizon: Towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 18(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.167
  • Pylkkänen, L. (2020). Neural basis of basic composition: What we have learned from the red–boat studies and their extensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1791), 20190299. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0299
  • Robertson, D. A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Guidotti, S. J., Robertson, R. R., Irwin, W., Mock, B. J., & Campana, M. E. (2000). Functional neuroanatomy of the cognitive process of mapping during discourse comprehension. Psychological Science, 11(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00251
  • Schmalhofer, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.). (2007). Higher level language processes in the Brain: Inference and comprehension processes. Erlbaum.
  • Speer, N. K., Zacks, J. M., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007). Human brain activity time-locked to narrative event boundaries. Psychological Science, 18(5), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01920.x
  • Virtue, S., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2008). Inferences during story comprehension: Cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2274–2284. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20160
  • Whitney, C., Huber, W., Klann, J., Weis, S., Krach, S., & Kircher, T. (2009). Neural correlates of narrative shifts during auditory story comprehension. NeuroImage, 47(1), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.037
  • Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, 44, 35–62.
  • Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Making replication mainstream. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 41, e120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17001972