727
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Empirical Study of Convenience Theory: A Student Elicitation on White-Collar Crime

Pages 747-757 | Received 14 Jan 2017, Accepted 02 Mar 2017, Published online: 05 Apr 2017

References

  • Clarke, Ronald V. 1999. Hot products: understanding, anticipating and reducing demand for stolen goods, Police Research Series, Paper 112, Policing and Reducing Crime Unit, Home Office, UK: London, www.popcenter.org.
  • Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review 44:588–608.
  • Colquitt, Jason A. and Cindy P. Zapata-Phelan. 2007. “Trends in Theory Building and Theory Testing: A Five-Decade Study of the Academy of Management Journal.” Academy of Management Journal 50(6):1281–1303.
  • Cressey, Donald. 1972. Criminal Organization: Its Elementary Forms. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
  • Delegationen. 2008. Vad koster felen? Omfattning av felaktiga utbetalingar från trygghetssystemen (What does the mistake cost? Estimation of wrongful payments from the security system), Stockholm, Sweden: Delegationen mot felaktiga utbetalningar.
  • Felson, Marcus and Rachel L. Boba. 2017. Crime and Everyday Life, Chapter 12: “White-Collar Crime”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Gottschalk, Petter. 2017. “Convenience in White-Collar Crime: Introducing a Core Concept.” Deviant Behavior. DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1197585.
  • Gottschalk, Petter and Maria Tcherni-Buzzeo. 2016. “Reasons for Gaps in Crime Reporting: The Case of White-Collar Criminals Investigated by Private Fraud Examiners in Norway.” Deviant Behavior 38(3):267–281.
  • Heyman, James and John Sailors. 2016. “A Respondent-Friendly Method of Ranking Long Lists.” International Journal of Market Research 58(5):693–710.
  • Lancaster, Kari. 2017. “Confidentiality, Anonymity and Power Relations in Elite Interviewing: Conducting Quality Policy Research in a Politicized Domain.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20(1):93–103.
  • Mai, Huynh T. X. and Svein Ottar Olsen. 2016. “Consumer Participation in Self-Production: The Role of Control Mechanisms, Convenience Orientation, and Moral Obligation.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 24(2):209–223.
  • Meyer, Mary A. and Jane M. Booker. 2001. Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment: A practical guide. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia: SIAM Books, ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM).
  • O’Connor, Michael E. 1984. “The Perception of Crime and Criminality: The Violent Criminal and Swindler as Social Types.” Deviant Behavior 5(4):255–274.
  • Pangrazio, Lucie. 2017. “Exploring Provocation as a Research Method in the Social Sciences.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology, published online doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1161346.
  • Proba. 2013. Trygdesvindel i Norge: En kartlegging av fem stønadsordninger (Social security fraud in Norway: A survey of five support areas), Oslo, Norway: Proba samfunnsanalyse.
  • Slottje, Pauline, Jeroin P. Sluijs and Anne B. Knol. 2008. Expert elicitation: Methodological suggestions for its use in environmental health impact assessments, RIVM Letter report, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the Netherlands.
  • Sutherland, Edwin H. 1939. “White-collar criminality.” American Sociological Review 5:1–12.
  • Trahan, Adam, James Marquart and Janet Mullings. 2005. “Fraud and the American Dream: Toward an Understanding of Fraud Victimization.” Deviant Behavior 26(6):601–620.
  • Valkenhoef, Gert and Tommi Tervonen. 2016. “Entropy-Optimal Weight Constraint Elicitation with Additive Multi-Attribute Utility Models.” Omega, 64:1–12.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.