What Does the Personification of Love and Sex Dolls Explain about Doll Owners?

References

• Adams-Santos, Dominique. 2020. “Sexuality and Digital Space.” Sociology Compass 14(8):e12818. doi:10.1111/soc4.12818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, Markus, Caroline Marker, and Martina Mara. 2019. “Otakuism and the Appeal of Sex Robots.” Frontiers in Psychology 10(569):1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caliandro, Alessandro. 2018. “Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 47(5):551–78. doi:10.1177/0891241617702960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Veronica. 2016. “For the Love of Doll(s): A Patriarchal Nightmare of Cyborg Couplings.” ECS: English Studies Canada 41(1–2):203–15. doi:10.1353/esc.2016.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Comella, Lynn. 2017. Vibrator Nation: How Feminist Sex-Toy Stores Changed the Business of Pleasure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D’Lane. 2018. “How Many (Queer) Cases Do I Need? Thinking Through Research Design.” Pp. 185–200 in Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology, edited by D’Lane Compton, Tey Meadow, and Kristen Schilt. Berkeley: University of California Press,
   Google Scholar
• Debra, Herbenick, Michael Reece, Stephanie Sanders, Brian Dodge, Annahita Ghassemi, and J. Dennis Fortenberry. 2009. “Prevalence and Characteristics of Vibrator Use by Women in the United States: Results from a Nationally Representative Study.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 6(7):1857–66. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01318.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Nicola, M. Rohangis Mohseni, and Roberto Walter. 2020. “Design, Use, and Effects of Sex Dolls and Sex Robots: Scoping Review.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 22(7):e18551. doi:10.2196/18551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Nicola, Nicole Krämer, Matthias Brand, Tillmann H.C. Kruger, Johanna M.F. van Oosten, and Gerhard Vowe. 2022. “Editorial: Sexual Interaction in Digital Contexts: Opportunities and Risks for Sexual Health.” Frontiers in Psychology 13:872445. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, Simon, Maria Santaguida, C. Y. Zhu Dave Anctil, Vachon David, Aaron Johnson, and A. Johnson. 2022. “Perceived Stigma and Erotic Technology: From Sex Toys to Erobots.” Psychology & Sexuality 1–17. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/19419899.2022.2067783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, Gary Alan. 1983. Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foote, Nelson N. 1954. “Sex as Play.” Social Problems 1(4):159–63. doi:10.2307/799390.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ging, Debbie. 2019. “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 22(4):638–57. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, NY: Anchor books.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Kenneth R. 2022. “The Silicone Self: Examining Sexual Selfhood and Stigma within the Love and Sex Doll Community.” Symbolic Interaction 45(2):189–210. doi:10.1002/symb.575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Craig A. and Rebecca Lievesley. 2020. “Sex Doll Ownership: An Agenda for Research.” Current Psychiatry Reports 22(10):1–8. doi:10.1007/s11920-020-01177-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Craig A., Rebecca Lievesley, and Katie Wanless.2022.“Exploring the Psychological Characteristics and Risk-Related Cognitions of Individuals Who Own Sex Dolls.” The Journal of Sex Research 1–16. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00224499.2022.2031848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, Andrea 2020. “Alien Femininities: Transcending Gender through Drag in an Aesthetically Restrictive Culture.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Kevin J. and J. Michael Bailey. 2019. “The “Furry” Phenomenon: Characterizing Sexual Orientation, Sexual Motivation, and Erotic Target Identity Inversions in Male Furries.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 48(5):1349–69. doi:10.1007/s10508-018-1303-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jecker, Nancy S. 2021. “Nothing to Be Ashamed Of: Sex Robots for Older Adults with Disabilities.” Journal of Medical Ethics 47(1):26–32. doi:10.1136/medethics-2020-106645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Angela. 2020. Camming: Money, Power, and Pleasure in the Sex Work Industry. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, Durkin, Criag J. Forsyth, and James F. Quinn. 2006. “Pathological Internet Communities: A New Direction for Sexual Deviance in A Post Modern Era.” Sociological Spectrum 26(6):595–606. doi:10.1080/02732170600948857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, Lori. 2002. Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klinenberg, Eric. 2012. Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone. New York, NY: The Pengu 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, David. 2008. Love + Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Interactions. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli, Chloé. 2022. Rethinking ‘Sex Robots:’ Gender, Desire and Embodiment in Posthuman Sextech. Journal of Digital Social Research Advance online publication
   Google Scholar
• Maras, Marie-Helen and Lauren D. Shapiro. 2017. “Child Sex Dolls and Robots: More than Just an Uncanny Valley.” Journal of Internet Law 21(5):3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Middleweek, Belinda. 2021. “Male Homosocial Bonds and Perceptions of Human-Robot Relationships in an Online Sex Doll Forum.” Sexualities 24(3):370–87. doi:10.1177/1363460720932383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Langcaster-James and Gillian R. Bentley. 2018. “Beyond the Sex Doll: Post-Human Companionship and the Rise of the “Allodoll.” Robotics 7(4):2–20. doi:10.3390/robotics7040062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmo, Morten, Julie Øverbø Næss, Marte Folkestad Husøy, and Mads Nordmo Arnestad. 2020. “Friends, Lovers or Nothing: Men and Women Differ in Their Perceptions of Sex Robots and Platonic Love Robots.” Frontiers in Psychology 11(355):1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman Makoto, Su, Amanda Lazar, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. “Of Dolls and Men: Anticipating Sexual Intimacy with Robots.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 26(3):1–35. doi:10.1145/3301422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Caroline 2020. “Instagram or Finstagram? A Survey on Self-Esteem and Need to Belong amongst Emerging adults.” Master’s Thesis, Dun Laoghaire Institute of Art, Design and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, C.J. 2011. Dude, You’re a Fag: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Whitney. 2015. This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Prayag. 2016. “Synthetik Love Lasts Forever: Sex Dolls and the (Post?) Human Condition.” Pp. 91–112 in Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, edited by D. Banerji and M. Paranjape. New Delhi: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-3637-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Kathleen. 2016. “Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35(2):46–53. doi:10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Gayle S. 2007. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheutz, Matthias and Thomas Arnold. 2016. “Are We Ready for Sex Robots?” ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Christchurch, New Zealand. doi:10.1109/HRI.2016.7451772
   Google Scholar
• Schilt, Kristen and Laurel Westbrook. 2009. “Doing Gender, Doing Heteronormativity: ‘Gender Normals,’ Transgender People, and the Social Maintenance of Heterosexuality.” Gender & Society 23(4):440–64. doi:10.1177/0891243209340034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sendler, Damian Jacob. 2018. “Why People Who Have Sex with Animals Believe that It Is Their Sexual Orientation — A Grounded Theory Study of Online Communities of Zoophiles.” Deviant Behavior 39(11):1507–14. doi:10.1080/01639625.2018.1491698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, Tony. 2017. “Bud-Sex: Constructing Normative Masculinity among Rural Straight Men that Have Sex with Men.” Gender & Society 31(1):51–73. doi:10.1177/0891243216679934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender Play: Girls and Boys in School. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Alicia M. and Arielle Kuperberg. 2022. “Pathways and Patterns of Entrance into BDSM.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 51(2):1045–62. doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02154-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Jane. 2015. Not Gay: Sex between Straight White Men. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Jane. 2020. The Tragedy of Heterosexuality. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, Candace and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender & Society 1(2):125–51. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar