Self-Efficacy for Therapeutic Use of Self Questionnaire: Turkish Adaptation

References

• Alpar, R. (2022). Uygulamalı istatistik ve geçerlik-güvenirlik: spor, sağlık ve eğitim bilimlerinden örneklerle. [Applied statistics and validity-reliability: with examples from sports, health and education sciences.]. Baskı. Detay Yayıncılık. Turkish.
   Google Scholar
• Andonian, L. (2017). Occupational therapy students’ self-efficacy, experience of supervision, and perception of meaningfulness of Level II fieldwork. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1220
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2011). IBM SPSS Amos 20 user’s guide (pp. 226–229). Amos Development Corporation, SPSS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. The American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross- cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., & Carstensen, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Norwegian self-efficacy for therapeutic mode use (N-SETMU). Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(6), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1316421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsaksen, T., Yazdani, F., Ellingham, B., & Carstensen, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Norwegian self-efficacy for managing interpersonal events (N-SEMIE). Ergoscience 2018, 13(3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.2443/skv-s-2018-54020180303
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Taylor, P. A., Haller, S. P., Kircanski, K., Stoddard, J., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., Brotman, M. A., & Cox, R. W. (2018). Intraclass correlation: Improved modeling approaches and applications for neuroimaging. Human Brain Mapping, 39(3), 1187–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumney, F. (2012). Principal components analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. In Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (eds.) Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2012, pp.99–136.
   Google Scholar
• Coster, W. J., & Mancini, M. C. (2015). Recommendations for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of instruments for occupational therapy research and practice. Revista De Terapia Ocupacional Da Universidade De São Paulo, 26(1), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2238-6149.v26i1p50-57
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, K., Stenberg, E., Liang, Y., Nilsson, U., & Jaensson, M. (2022). The General Self- Efficacy Scale in a population planned for bariatric surgery in Sweden: a psychometric evaluation study. BMJ Open, 12(11), e061509. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. C., Cheavens, J. S., Heiy, J. E., & Cukrowicz, K. C. (2010). A reexamination of the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: is a one- factor model plausible? Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 711–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ercan Doğu, S., Özkan, E., & Kars, S. (2023). Clinical practices, challenges, and job satisfaction of occupational therapists working in community mental health centers in Turkey. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(7), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231156529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkorkmaz, Ü., Etikan, İ., Demir, O., Özdamar, K., & Sanisoğlu, S. Y. (2013). Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve uyum indeksleri. [Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: Review]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 33(1), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-26747
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C.-W., Carstensen, T., Småstuen, M. C., Yazdani, F., Ellingham, B., & Bonsaksen, T. (2020). Occupational therapy students’ self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self: Development and associated factors. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2020.040103
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C. W., Yazdani, F., Carstensen, T., & Bonsaksen, T. (2021). Rasch analysis of the self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self questionnaire in Norwegian occupational therapy students. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 28(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2020.1726453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Assembly of the World Medical Association. (2014). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The Journal of the American College of Dentists, 81(3), 14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill, C. J. (2010). Differences in the utilization of therapeutic use of self by occupational therapists in military and civilian settings [Master’s thesis]. University of Puget Sound. Occupational Therapy Commons Repository. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/ms_occ_therapy/9
   Google Scholar
• Gorenberg, M. (2013). Instructional ınsights: Continuing professional education to enhance therapeutic relationships in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 27(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2013.834404
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2016). IBM Corporation: SPSS for Windows version 23. IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., & Maas, F. (1991). The therapeutic relationship. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(3), 111–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269105400309
   Google Scholar
• Mendi, O., Yildirim, N., & Mendi, B. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the health professionals communication skills scale. Asian Nursing Research, 14(5), 312–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaka, M. M. (2012). A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piedmont, R. L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 3303–3304). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, V. C., Thørrisen, M. M., Yazdani, F., & Bonsaksen, T. (2017). Further validation of the norwegian self-efficacy for therapeutic mode use. Occupational Therapy International, 2017, 2017, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9745373
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, V. C., Yazdani, F., Carstensen, T., Thørrisen, M. M., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). Psychometric properties of an instrument derived from the Intentional Relationship Model: the self-efficacy for recognizing clients’ interpersonal characteristics (N-SERIC). The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 6(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1423
   Google Scholar
• Schwank, K., Carstensen, T., Yazdani, F., & Bonsaksen, T. (2018). The course of self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self in Norwegian occupational therapy students: a 10-month follow-up study. Occupational Therapy İnternational, 2018, 2962747. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2962747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solman, B., & Clouston, T. (2016). Occupational therapy and the therapeutic use of self. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(8), 514–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022616638675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2015). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.003.0006
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. R. (2008). Knowing ourselves as therapists: Introduction to therapeutic modes. In The intentional relationship: Outpatient therapy and use of self (pp. 67–99). FA Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. R., Lee, S. W., & Kielhofner, G. (2011). Practitioners’ use of interpersonal modes within the therapeutic relationship: Results from a nationwide study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 31(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20100521-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zyl, L. E., Klibert, J., Shankland, R., See-To, E. W., & Rothmann, S. (2022). The general academic self-efficacy scale: psychometric properties, longitudinal invariance, and criterion validity. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(6), 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829221097174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach’s alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vax, S., Schreuer, N., & Sachs, D. (2012). Work-related self-efficacy of occupational therapists in mental health. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.527366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Andrinopoulou, E. R., Veen, K. M., Bogers, A. J. J. C., & Takkenberg, J. J. M. (2022). Statistical primer: an introduction to the application of linear mixed-effects models in cardiothoracic surgery outcomes research-a case study using homograft pulmonary valve replacement data. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery: official Journal of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 62(4), ezac429. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E. (2018). Relational interaction in occupational therapy: conversation analysis of positive feedback. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2017.1282040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, S. R. (2016). Therapeutic use of self in occupational therapy: Applying the ıntentional relationship model [Doctoral dissertation]. University of of Illinois at Chicago. University Illinois Library. https://hdl.handle.net/10027/21339
   Google Scholar
• Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. [Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.]. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46(Özel sayı), 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani, F., & Bonsaksen, T. (2019). Psychometric properties of the self-efficacy for therapeutic mode use tool in a mixed sample of occupational therapists: a pilot study. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 26(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2018.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, F., Bonsaksen, T., Roberts, D., Hess, K. Y., & Esmaili, S. K. (2021). The self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self-questionnaire (SETUS): psychometric properties of the English version. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOT-10-2020-0015
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani, F., & Tune, K. (2016). Self-efficacy for therapeutic use of self (unpublished instrument). Oxford Brookes University.
   Google Scholar