Description of three new species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from Sundarban, West Bengal, India

References

• Athias-Henriot C. 1957. Phytoseiidae at Aceosejidae (Acarina, Gamasina) d’Algerie. I. Genres Blattisocius Keegan, Iphiseius Berlese, Amblyseius Berlese, Phytoseius Ribaga, Phytoseiulus Evans. Bulletin de la Societe d’histoire Naturelle d’Afrique du Nord. 48:319–352.
   Google Scholar
• Athias-Henriot C. 1975. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. II. Le releveorganotaxique de La facedorsaleadulte (Gamasidesproto adeniques, Phytoseiidae). Acarologia. 17:20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Chant DA. 1957. Descriptions of some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Part I. described by Berlese. The Canadian Entomologist. 89:289–308.
   Google Scholar
• Chant DA. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina). Part I. Bionomics of seven species in Southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic revision of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. The Canadian Entomologist. Suppl. 12:1–166.
   Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology. 20:223– 310.
   Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2004. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part III. The tribe Amblyseiini Wainstein: subtribe Amblyseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology. 30:171–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005a. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part V. Tribe Amblyseiini, subtribe Proprioseiopsina Chant and McMurtry. International Journal of Acarology. 31:3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2005b. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Part VI. The tribe Euseiini n. tribe, subtribes Typhlodromalina n. subtribe, Euseiina n. subtribe, and Ricoseiina n. subtribe. International Journal of Acarology. 31:187–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). West Bloomfield: Indira Publishing House. p. 219.
   Google Scholar
• Chant DA, Yoshida-Shaul E. 1991. Adult ventral setal patterns in the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina). International Journal of Acarology. 17:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Chinniah C, Mohanasundaram M. 2001. Five new species of predatory mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Kerala, India. Entomon. 26:65–77.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon D. 1959. Two new genera of phytoseiid mites with a note on Proprioseius meridionalis Chant (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomology News. 70:257–262.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon D. 1965. Phytoseiid mites from Puerto Rico with descriptions of new species (Acarina: Mesostigmata). The Florida Entomologist. 48:121–131.
   Google Scholar
• De Leon D. 1967. Some mites of the Caribbean Area. Part I. Acarina on plants in Trinidad, West Indies. Lawrence (Kansas): Allen Press Inc. p. 66.
   Google Scholar
• Demite PR, Gondim MGC Jr, Lofego AC, deMoraes GJ. 2014. A new species of Galendromimus Muma from Brazil (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a review of the tribe Galendromimini Chant & McMurtry. Zootaxa. 3835:593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demite PR, Moraes GJ, de McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Castilho RC. 2020. Phytoseiidae Database; [accessed 2020 Sep 12]. http://www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae.
   Google Scholar
• deMoraes GJ, McMurtry JA, Denmark HA, Campos CB. 2004. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa. 434:1–494.
   Google Scholar
• Evans GO. 1953. XLIII.—On some mites of the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857, from S.E. Asia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 6:449–467.
   Google Scholar
• Fang XD, Hao HH, Wu WN. 2018. Two new species of Typhlodromus Scheten (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Hainan Islands, China. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 23:925–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garman P. 1958. New species belonging to the genera Amblyseius and Amblyseiopsis with keys to Amblyseius, Amblyseiopsis, and Phytoseiulus. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 51:69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ghai S, Menon MGR. 1969. Taxonomic studies on Indian mites of the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina). II. Two new genera and species of Phytoseiidae. Oriental Insects 3:347–352. doi:10.1080/00305316.1969.10433928.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1969a. Description of a new species of Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from India. Science and Culture. 35:277–278.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1969b. Three new species of genus Phytoseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from India. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research. 19:115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1975. Mites of the genus Amblyseius (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from India with descriptions of eight new species. International Journal of Acarology. 1:26–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1977. New species and records of Typhlodromus and Phytoseius from Eastern India (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Indian Journal of Acarology. 2:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1980. New species of Iphiseius Berlese and Paraamblyseius Muma from India (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomologist’s Monthly Magazine. 115:213–217.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1985. Three new Phytoseiidae from India (Acari: Mesostigmata). Entomon. 10:209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SK. 1986. Fauna of India (Acari: Mesostigmata) Family Phytoseiidae. Calcutta (India): Zoological Survey of India. p. 350.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta SK, Karmakar K. 2015. An updated checklist of Indian Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata). India. Records of Zoological Survey of India. 115:51–72.
   Google Scholar
• Karmakar K, Bhowmik S. 2018. Description of eight new species and re-description of four species belonging to the family Phytoseiidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa. 4422:041–077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar K, Bhowmik S, Sherpa C. 2017. Description of five new species and re-description of two species of Amblyseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa. 4311:39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar K, Gupta SK. 2014. Descriptions of four new species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) from West Bengal, India. Records of Zoological Survey of India. 114:687–700.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodochka LA. 1988. A new genus and new species of the mite family Phytoseiidae (Parasitiformes). Vestnik Zoologii. 4:42–45. (In Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Kostiainen TS, Hoy MA. 1996. The Phytoseiidae as biological control agents of pest mites and insects. A bibliography (1960–1994). Monography. 17:355. University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist EE, Evans GO. 1965. Taxonomic concepts of in the Ascidae, with a modified setal nomenclature for the idiosoma of Gamasina. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada. 47:64.
   Google Scholar
• McMurtry JA, De Moraes GJ, Sourassou NF. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 18:297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muma MH. 1955. Phytoseiidae (Acarina) associated with citrus in Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 48:262–272.
   Google Scholar
• Muma MH. 1961. Subfamilies, genera and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Florida State Museum Bulletin. 5:267–302.
   Google Scholar
• Muma MH, Denmark HA. 1968. Some generic descriptions and name changes in the family Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). The Florida Entomologist. 51:229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Nesbitt HHJ. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zoologische Verhandelingen. 12:64. The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Oudemans AC. 1905. Verslag van de stigste zomervergadering der Netherlandsche Entomologische Vereenigign gehoulden te driebergen op zatendag, 20 Mei 1905, des morgens ten 11 ure. Tijdschr. Entomology. 48:77–81. The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Oudemans AC. 1915. Acarologische Aanteekeningen LVI. Entomology Bericht. 4:180–188.
   Google Scholar
• Pramanik S, Karmakar K. 2016. Description of six new species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from Arunachal Pradesh, India. Persian Journal of Acarology. 5:161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell HJ, Chant DA, Hansell RIC. 1978. The determination of setal homologies and setal patterns on the dorsal shield in the family phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). The Canadian Entomologists. 110:859–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swirski E, Sehechter R. 1961. Some phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from Hong Kong, with a description of a new genus and seven new species. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research. 11:97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng YH. 1983. Further study on phytoseiid mites from Taiwan (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Chinese Journal of Entomology. 3:33–74.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle DM, Muma MH. 1973. Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) inhabiting agricultural and other plants in Arizona. In Agricultural experiment station. Technical Bulletin. Vol. 208, Tucson (USA): University of Arizona; 55 p.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe GG. 1968. A taxonomic study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in South Africa with contributions to the biology of two species. Entomology Memoirs. 18:1–198. Department of Agricultural Technical Services, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Wainstein BA. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857 et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese, 1916) (Acarina:Parasitiformes). Acarologia. 4:5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Wu WN. 1983. Two new species of Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) from China. Zoological Research, China. 4:15–18. [in Chinese].
   Google Scholar
• Wu WN, Ou JF, Huang JL. 2009. Fauna Sinica, Invertebrata vol. 47. Arachnida Acari: Phytoseiidae. Beijing (China): Science Press; p. 511. [In Chinese with English abstract].
   Google Scholar