The fish fauna of an Atlantic Forest conservation area in the largest urban center of South America (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and its relationship to some environmental factors

References

• Abelha MC, Goulart E. 2004. Oportunismo trófico de Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1824) (Osteichthyes, Cichlidae) no reservatório de Capivari, Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Acta Sci. 26(1):37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Abilhoa V, Braga RR, Bornatowski H, Vitule JRS. 2011. Fishes of the Atlantic rain forest streams: ecological patterns and conservation. In: Grillo O, Venora G, editors. Changing diversity in changing environment. Rijeka: Intech. p. 259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Gomes LC. 2004. Threats for biodiversity in the floodplain of the Upper Paraná River: effects of hydrological regulation by dams. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 4(3):255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Gomes L. 2005. Conservation of the biodiversity of Brazil’s inland waters. Conserv Biol. 19(3):646–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandre CV, Esteves KE, de Moura e Mello MAM. 2010. Analysis of fish communities along a rural–urban gradient in a neotropical stream (Piracicaba River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil). Hydrobiologia. 641(1):97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Angermeier PL, Karr JR. 1984. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Trans Am Fish Soc. 113(6):716–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benke AC, Van Ardsall TC, Gillespie DM, Parrish FK. 1984. Invertebrate productivity in a subtropical blackwater river: the importance of habitat and life history. Ecol Monogr. 54(1):25–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojsen BH, Barriga R. 2002. Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams. Freshwater Biol. 47(11):2246–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito IM, Ribeiro FAM. 1975. Ocorrência de lepidópteros nos folhetos de Tremembé e algumas considerações sobre a Bacia Geológica do Paraíba, Estado de São Paulo. An Acad Bras Ciênc. 47(1):105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Britski HA. 1972. Peixes de água doce do Estado de São Paulo – Sistemática. In: Comissão Interestadual da Bacia Paraná – Uruguai. São Paulo: Poluição e Piscicultura, Faculdade de Saúde Pública da USP e Instituto de Pesca. p. 79–108.
   Google Scholar
• Britski HA, Sato S, Rosa ABS. 1986. Manual de identificação de peixes da região de Três Marias (com chaves de identificação para os peixes da Bacia do São Francisco). 2. ed. Brasília: CODEVASF.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton MN. 1995. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ Biol Fish. 43(1):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callisto M, Ferreira W, Moreno P, Goulart MDC, Petrucio M. 2002. Aplicação de um protocolo de avaliação rápida da diversidade de habitats em atividades de ensino e pesquisa (MG-RJ). Acta Limnol Bras. 14(1):91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho ED, Castro RJ, da Silva VFB, Vidotto AP. 2003. A estrutura das assembléias de peixes nas zonas de ecótono da represa de Jurumirim (Alto rio Paranapanema, SP). In: Henry R, editor. Ecótonos nas interfaces dos ecossistemas aquáticos. São Carlos Brasil: RiMA. p. 249–278.
   Google Scholar
• Casatti L, Langeani F, Castro RMC. 2001. Peixes de riacho do Parque Estadual Morro do Diabo, bacia do alto rio Paraná, SP. Biota Neotrop. 1(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Casatti L, Langeani F, Menezes NA, Oyakawa OT, Braga FMS. 2008. Peixes de Água Doce. In: Rodrigues RR, Joly CA, Brito MCW, Paese A, Metzger JP, Casatti L, Nalon MA, Menezes N, Ivanauska NM, Bolzani V, Bononi VLR, editors. Diretrizes para conservação e restauração da biodiversidade no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: Governo do Estado de São Paulo. pp. 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Casatti L, Langeani F, Silva AM, Castro RMC. 2006. Stream fish, water and habitat quality in a pasture dominated basin, southeastern Brazil. Braz J Biol. 66(2):681–696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cowx IG. 2002. Analysis of threats to freshwater fish conservation: past and present challenges. In: Collares-Pereira MJ, Cowx IG, Coelho MM, editors. Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Scientific Press. p. 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cowx IG, Collares-Pereira MJ. 2002. Freshwater fish conservation: options for the future. In: M. Collares-Pereira MJ, Cowx IG, Coelho MM, editors. Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Scientific Press. p. 443–452.
   Google Scholar
• Danehy RJ, Ringler NH, Stehman SV, Hasset JM. 1998. Variability of fish densities in a small catchment. Ecol Freshw Fish. 7(1):36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DOSP] Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo. 2014. Decreto nº 60.133, de 7 de fevereiro de 2014 [Internet]. [cited 2014 April 16]. São Paulo. Available from: http://www.imprensaoficial.com.br/PortalIO/DO/GatewayPDF.aspx?link=/2014/executivo%20secao%20i/fevereiro/08/pag_0025_8JDL3R1IUCR3UeBO89AIQC64DME.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donadio NMM, Galbiatti JA, de Paula RC. 2005. Qualidade da água de nascentes com diferentes usos do solo na bacia hidrográfica do Córrego Rico, São Paulo, Brasil. Eng Agríc. 25(1):115–125.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves KE, Lobo AVP, Faria MDR. 2008. Trophic structure of a fish community along environmental gradients of a subtropical river (Paraitinga River, Upper Tietê River basin, Brazil). Hydrobiologia. 598(1):737–387.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA, Corbert AS, Williams CB. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol. 12(1):42–58.
   Google Scholar
• Furlan N, Esteves KE, Quináglia G. 2013. Environmental factors associated with fish distribution in an urban neotropical river (Upper Tietê River Basin, São Paulo, Brazil). Environ Biol Fish. 96(1):77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhard P, Moraes R, Molander S. 2004. Stream fish communities and their associations to habitat variables in a rain forest reserve in Southeastern Brazil. Environ Biol Fish. 71(4):321–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomiero LM, Braga FMS. 2006. Relação peso-comprimento e fator de condição de Brycon opalinus (Pisces, Characiformes) no Parque Estadual da Serra do Mar – Núcleo Santa Virgínia, Mata Atlântica, Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Acta Sci. 28(2):135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves S, Manoel F, Braga DS. 2012. Changes in ichthyofauna composition along a gradient from clearwaters to blackwaters in coastal streams of Atlantic forest (southeastern Brazil) in relation to environmental variables. Neotrop Ichthyol. 10(3):675–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GTZ] Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit. 2010. Áreas de conservación municipal: una oportunidad para la conservación de la biodiversidad y el desarrollo local. Reflexiones y experiencias desde América Latina. Brasilia (DF):GTZ. p. 106.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: palaeontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harding JS, Benfield E, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones III EBD. 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:14843–14847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope ACA. 1968. A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. J R Stat Soc. 30(3):582–598.
   Google Scholar
• Jacintho LRC. 2003. Geoprocessamento e Sensoriamento Remoto como Ferramentas na Gestão Ambiental de Unidades de Conservação: o Caso da Área de Proteção Ambiental (APA) do Capivari-Monos [Master dissertation]. São Paulo (SP): Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs CJ. 1989. Ecological methodology. New York (NY): Harper Collins. p. 607.
   Google Scholar
• Langeani F. 1989. Ictiofauna do Alto curso do rio Tietê (SP): Taxonomia [Master dissertation]. São Paulo (SP): Universidade de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Gallagher ED. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations of ordinations of species data. Oecologia. 129(2):271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L 1998. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific. p. 870.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig A, Reynolds F. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York, (NY): John Wiley and Sons. p. 341.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. p. 256.
   Google Scholar
• Maier MH. 1978. Considerações sobre características limnológicas de ambientes lóticos. Bol Inst Pesca. 5(2):75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Manna de Deus JR, Nicolau SA, Martins R, Frizzera-Borges MR, Cortez L, Iartelli R, Silva FSD. 2001. Biodiversidade do Alto Curso do Rio Tietê. Relatório Geral. Centro de Monitoramento Ambiental da Serra do Itapety – Cemasi. Universidade Braz Cubas and Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, SP.
   Google Scholar
• Marceniuk AP, Hilsdorf AVS, Langeani F. 2011. A ictiofauna de cabeceiras do Rio Tietê, São Paulo, Brasil. Biota Neotrop. 11(3):217–236.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Smith KK. 1998. Relationships between fishes and habitat in rainforest streams in Sabah, Malaysia. J Fish Biol. 52(3):458–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattox GMT. 2008. Peixes do município de São Paulo: passado, presente e futuro. In: Malagoli LR, Bajesteiro FB, Whately M, editors. Além do concreto: contribuições para a proteção da biodiversidade paulistana. São Paulo: Instituto Socioambiental. p. 180–203.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni R, Fenerich-Verani N, Caramaschi EP. 2000. Electrofishing as a sampling technique for coastal stream fish populations and communities in the Southeast of Brazil. Braz J Biol. 60(2):205–216.
   Google Scholar
• McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2011. PC-ORD – multivariate analysis of ecological data (version 6). Gleneden Beach, (OR): MjM Software Design.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes NA, Weitzman SH. 2009. Systematics of the Neotropical fish subfamily Glandulocaudinae (Teleostei : Characiformes : Characidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 7(3):295–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes NA, Weitzman SH, Oyakawa OT, Lima FCT, Castro RMC, Weitzman MJ. 2007. Peixes de água doce da Mata Atlântica: lista preliminar das espécies e comentários sobre conservação de peixes de água doce neotropicais. São Paulo: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. p. 408.
   Google Scholar
• [MMA] Ministério do Meio Ambiente. 2000. Avaliação e ações prioritárias para conservação da biodiversidade da Mata Atlântica e campos sulinos [Internet]. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília, DF, Brasil; [cited 2013 Jun 5]. Available from: http://www.conservation.org.br/ma/mapas/peixes.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdorff T, Hugueny B, Vigneron T. 2001. Is assemblage variability related to environmental variability? An answer for riverine fish. Oikos. 93(3):419–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyakawa OT, Akama A, Mautari KC, Nolasco JC. 2006. Peixes de riachos da Mata Atlântica nas Unidades de Conservação do Vale do Ribeira de Iguape no Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo, Editora Neotropica. p. 201.
   Google Scholar
• Penczak T. 1981. Ecological fish production in two small lowland Rivers in Poland. Oecologia. 48(1):107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry AC, Schulz UH. 2006. Longitudinal changes and indicator species of the fish fauna in the subtropical Sinos River, Brazil. J Fish Biol. 69(1):272–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. 1989. Mathematical ecology. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. p. 181.
   Google Scholar
• Pusey BJ, Arthington AH, Read MG. 1995. Species richness and spatial variation in fish assemblage structure in two rivers of the Wet Tropics of northern Queensland, Australia. Environ Bio Fish. 42(2):181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro AA, Lima FCT, Riccomini C, Menezes, NA. 2006. Fishes of the Atlantic Rainforest of Boracéia: testimonies of the Quaternary fault reactivation within a Neoproterozoic tectonic province in Southeastern Brazil. Ichthyol Explor Freshw. 17(2):157–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro AC. 2006. Tectonic history and the biogeography of the freshwater fishes from the coastal drainages of eastern Brazil: an example of faunal evolution associated with a divergent continental margin. Neotrop Ichthyol. 4(2):225–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolla APPR, Esteves KE, Ávila-da-Silva AO. 2009. Feeding ecology of a stream fish assemblage in an Atlantic Forest remnant (Serra do Japi, SP, Brazil). Neotrop Ichthyol. 7(1):65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa RS, Lima FCT. 2008. Peixes. In: Machado AB, Martins CS, Drummond GM, editors. Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção. Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte. 1st ed. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente; Fundação Biodiversitas. p. 285.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I, Fill HD, Sugai MRVB, Buba H, Kishi RT, Marone D, Lautert LF. 2001. Hidrometria Aplicada. Instituto de Tecnologia para o Desenvolvimento. Curitiba: LACTEC. p. 372.
   Google Scholar
• São Paulo ( Prefeitura). 2011. Plano de Manejo – Área de Proteção Ambiental Capivari-Monos Secretaria do Verde e Meio Ambiente [Internet]. São Paulo, Brazil: Prefeitura do Município de São Paulo; [cited 2013 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/meio_ambiente/publicacoes_svma/index.php?p=26341.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmento-Soares L, Mazzoni R, Martins-Pinheiro RF. 2009. A fauna de peixes na bacia do Rio Jucuruçu, leste de Minas Gerais e extremo Sul da Bahia. Pan-American J Aquat Sci. 4(2):193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders DL, Meeuvig JJ, Vincent ACJ. 2002. Freshwater protected areas: strategies for conservation. Conserv Biol. 16(1):30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer SA. 1998. Conflict and resolution: impact of new taxa on phylogenetic studies of the Neotropical cascudinhos (Siluroidei: Loricariidae). In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZMS, Lucena CAS, editors. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS. p. 375–400.
   Google Scholar
• Serra JP, Carvalho FR, Langeani F. 2007. Ichtyofauna of the rio Itatinga in the Parque das Neblinas, Bertioga, São Paulo State: composition and biogeography [Internet]. São Paulo: Biota Neotropica; [cited 2013 11 Jul]. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-06032007000100011&lng=en.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S167606032007000100011
   Google Scholar
• Shirvell CS. 1990. Role of instream rootwads as juvenile Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and Steelhead trout (O. mykiss) cover habitat under varying streamflows. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 47(5):852–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva FSD, Deus JRM, Hilsdorf AW. 2006. The upper reached ichthyofauna of the Tietê River, São Paulo, Brazil: aspects of their diversity and conservation. Biodivers Conserv. 15(11):3569–3577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sioli H. 1984. The Amazon and its main affluents: hydrography, morphology of the river courses, and river types. In: Sioli H, editor. The Amazon: limnology and landscape ecology of a mighty tropical river and its basin. Netherlands: Dr. W. Junk Publishers. p. 127–165.
   Google Scholar
• Súarez YR, Petrere JR. M. 2006. Gradientes de diversidade nas comunidades de peixes da bacia do rio Iguatemi, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia Ser Zool. 96(2):197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Suski CD, Cooke SJ. 2007. Conservation of aquatic resources through the use of freshwater protected areas: opportunities and challenges. Biodiver Conserv. 16(7):2015–2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarifa JR, Armani G. 2001. Os Climas Urbanos. In: Tarifa JR, Azevedo TR, editors. Os Climas na Cidade de São Paulo. GEOUSP4, Universidade de São Paulo. p. 47–70.
   Google Scholar
• Tejerina-Garro FL, Maldonado M, Ibañez C, Pont D, Roset N, Oberdorff T. 2005. Effects of natural and anthropogenic environmental changes on riverine fish assemblages: a framework for ecological assessment of rivers. Braz Arch Biol Techn. 48(1):91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak C, Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca: Microcomputer Power. p. 500.
   Google Scholar
• ter Braak CJF. 1987. CANOCO – a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by partial, detrended, canonical correspondence analysis, principal components analysis, and redundance analysis. Wageningen: Agricultural Mathematics Group.
   Google Scholar
• Triska FJ, Sedell JR, Cromack K, Gregory SV, McCorison FM. 1984. Nitrogen budget for a small coniferous forest stream. Ecol Monogr. 54(1):119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valério SB, Suárez YR, Felipe TRA, Tondato KK, Ximenes LQL. 2007. Organization patterns of headwater-stream fish communities in the Upper Paraguay–Paraná basins. Hydrobiologia. 583(1):241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 37:130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira DB, Shibatta OA. 2007. Peixes como indicadores da qualidade ambiental do Ribeirão Esperança, município de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. Biota Neotrop. 7(1):57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wentworth CK. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30(5):377–392.
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 2010. Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall. EUA. p. 499.
   Google Scholar