Influence of habitat modification by livestock on páramo bird abundance in southern Andes of Ecuador

References

• Astudillo PX 2014. Effects of forest fragmentation on bird communities in a tropical hotspot [ PhD thesis]. Marburg (Germany): Philipps-Universität Marburg.
   Google Scholar
• Astudillo PX, Samaniego GM, Machado PJ, Aguilar JM, Tinoco BA, Graham CH, Latta SC, Farwig N. 2014. The impact of roads on the avifauna of páramo grasslands in Cajas National Park, Ecuador. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 49:204–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo PX, Tinoco BA, Siddons DC. 2015. The avifauna of Cajas National Park and Mazán Reserve, southern Ecuador, with notes on new records. Cotinga. 37:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baquero F, Sierra R, Ordóñez L, Tipán M, Espinoza L, Rivera MB, Soria P. 2004. La Vegetación de los Andes del Ecuador. Memoria explicativa de los mapas de vegetación potencial y remanente de los Andes del Ecuador a escala 1:250.000 y del modelamiento predictivo con especies indicadoras. Quito (Ecuador): EcoCiencia. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Bucheli GF. 2007. Parque Nacional Cajas una oportunidad para la vida y el desarrollo local sustentable. Cuenca (Ecuador): Empresa Municipal de Telecomunicaciones, Agua Potable, Alcantarillado y Saneamiento Ambiental de Cuenca.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill JRA, Matthysen E. 2007. Habitat use by two specialist birds in high-Andean Polylepis forests. Biol Conserv. 140:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celleri R, Willems P, Buytaert W, Feyen J. 2007. Space–time rainfall variability in the Paute basin, Ecuadorian Andes. Hydrol Process. 21:3316–3327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debinski DM, Holt RD. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol. 14:342–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado O, López F, Aguilar M, Cordero M. 2006. Componente geomorfología glaciar del Parque Nacional Cajas – Ecuador. Unpubl. rep. Cuenca (Ecuador): Universidad del Azuay & Parque Nacional Cajas.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo MB, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, et al. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: A review. Ecography. 30:609–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldså J, Krabbe N. 1990. Birds of the high Andes. Svendborg, Denmark: Zoological Museum. Univ. of Copenhagen and Apollo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foley JA, Defries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309:570–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gareca EE, Hermy M, Fjeldså J, Honnay O. 2010. Polylepis woodland remnants as biodiversity islands in the Bolivian high Andes. Biodivers Conserv. 19:3327–3346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grass I, Berens DG, Farwig N. 2014. Natural habitat loss and exotic plants reduce the functional diversity of flower visitors in a heterogeneous subtropical landscape. Funct Ecol. 28:1117–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamer TL, Flather CH, Noon BR. 2006. Factors associated with grassland bird species richness: the relative roles of grassland area, landscape structure, and prey. Landsc Ecol. 21:569–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede R, Coppus R, Mena-Vásconez P, Segarra P, Wolf J. 2002. The conservation status of tussock grass páramo in Ecuador. Ecotropicos. 15:3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper DU, Adair EC, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Gonzalez A, Duffy JE, Gamfeldt L, O’Connor MI. 2012. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature. 486:105–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto de Estudios de Régimen Seccional. 2004. Estaciones meteorológicas de la cuenca del río Paute. Cuenca (Ecuador): Universidad del Azuay.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson DA. 1993. Stopping rules in principal components analysis: a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology. 74:2204–2214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen P, Ulloa-Ulloa C, León B, León-Yánez S, Beck S, Nee M, Zarucchi J, Celis M, Bernal R, Gradstein R. 2011. Regional patterns of vascular plant diversity and endemism. In: Herzog S, Martínez R, Jorgensen P, Tiess H, editors. Climate change and biodiversity in the tropical andes. São José dos Campos (Brazil): Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE). p. 192–203.
   Google Scholar
• Kintz DB, Young KR, Crews-Meyer KA. 2006. Implications of land use/land cover change in the buffer zone of a National Park in the tropical Andes. Environ Manage. 38(2):238–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenen M. 2000. Effects of fire on birds in Paramo habitat of northern Ecuador. Ornitol Neotrop. 11:155–163.
   Google Scholar
• Koh LP, Ghazoul J. 2010. A matrix-calibrated species-area model for predicting biodiversity losses due to land-use change. Conserv Biol. 24:994–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, et al. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang. 11:261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Yánez S. 2000. La flora de los páramos ecuatorianos. In: Josse C, Mena PA, Media G, editors. La biodiversidad de los páramos. Quito (Ecuador): Serie Páramo 7. p. 5–21. GTP/AbyaYala
   Google Scholar
• Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE. 2002. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr. 72:445–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd H, Marsden SJ. 2008. Bird community variation across Polylepis woodland fragments and matrix habitats: implications for biodiversity conservation within a high Andean landscape. Biodivers Conserv. 17:2645–2660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd H, Marsden SJ. 2011. Between-patch bird movements within a high-andean polylepis woodland/matrix landscape: implications for habitat restoration. Restor Ecol. 19:74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matson E, Bart D. 2013. Interactions among fire legacies, grazing and topography predict shrub encroachment in post-agricultural páramo. Landsc Ecol. 28:1829–1840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckinney ML, Lockwood JL. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Tree. 14:450–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena-Vásconez P, Hofstede R. 2006. Los páramos ecuatorianos. In: Morales M, Øllgaard B, Vist LP, Borchsenius F, Balslev H, editors. Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés. p. 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Minga D, Ansaloni R, Verdugo A, Ulloa C. 2016. Flora del páramo del Cajas, Ecuador. Cuenca, (Ecuador): Universidad del Azuay.
   Google Scholar
• Minga D, Verdugo A 2007. Riqueza florística y endemismo del Parque Nacional Cajas. Unpublished report. Cuenca (Ecuador): Herbario Azuay, Universidad del Azuay
   Google Scholar
• Minga D, Verdugo A, Ansaloni R, Izco J 2013. Diversidad fitocenótica en el Parque Nacional Cajas, Azuay, Ecuador. Unpublished report. Cuenca (Ecuador): Herbario Azuay, Universidad del Azuay.
   Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403:853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill DA. 1999. Vegetación. In: Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S, editors. Catalogue of Vascular plants of Ecuador. Vol. 75. St. Louis (MO): Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard. p. 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Norment CJ, Runge MC, Morgan MR. 2010. Breeding biology of Grassland Birds in Western New York: conservation and management implications. Avian Conserv Ecol. 5:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nur N, Jones SL, Geupel GR. 1999. A statistical guide to data analysis of avian monitoring programs. Washington (DC): US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen BO, Krabbe N. 1998. Avifaunal diversity of five high-altitude cloud forests on the Andean western slope of Ecuador : testing a rapid assessment method. J Biogeogr. 25:83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ralph CJ, Geupel R, Pyle P, Martin TE, DeSante DF. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. Bolinas (CA): Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay PM 1992. The Paramo Vegetation of Ecuador : the Community Ecology, Dynamics and Productivity of Tropical Grasslands in the Andes [ PhD thesis]. Bangor (UK): Prifysgol Bangor University.
   Google Scholar
• Remsen JVJ, Areta JI, Cadena CD, Jaramillo A, Nores M, Pacheco JF, Pérez-Emán J, et al. 2016. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithologists’Union. Version 2016 Apr 14 [Internet]. [cited 2016 March 03]. Available from: www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ridgely R. 1980. Notes on some rare or previously unrecorded birds in Ecuador. Am Birds. 34:242–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgely RS, Greenfield PJ. 2001. The birds of ecuador, Vol. 1: status, distribution, and taxonomy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 287: 1770–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaniego GM, Nieto A, Astudillo PX, Graham CH, Latta SC, Tinoco BA. 2013. Influencia de la ganadería en la comunidad de aves de páramo en el Parque Nacional Cajas. Univ Verdad 60: 43–70. Available from: https://www.uazuay.edu.ec/bibliotecas/publicaciones/UV-60.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarmiento FO. 2000. Breaking mountain paradigms: ecological effects on human impacts in man-aged tropandean landscapes. AMBIO A J Hum Environ. 29:423–431.
   Google Scholar
• Sarmiento FO, Frolich LM. 2002. Andean cloud forest tree lines. Mt Res Dev. 22:278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento L. 2006. Grazing impact on vegetation structure and plant species richness in an old-field succession of the Venezuelan Páramos. In: Spehn EM, Liberman M, Korner C, editors. Land use change and mountain biodiversity. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC. p. 119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ, Wege DC. 1998. Endemic bird areas of the world. Priorities for biodiversity conservation. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International, Conservation Series 7.
   Google Scholar
• Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW, Parker III TA, Moskovits DK. 1996. Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Chicago (USA): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suarez G, Medina E. 2001. Vegetation structure and soil properties in Ecuadorian Páramo Grasslands with different histories of burning and grazing. Arctic, Antarct Alp Res. 33:158–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbörger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F. 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr. 31:79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinoco BA, Astudillo PX, Latta SC, Strubbe D, Graham CH. 2013. Influence of Patch Factors and Connectivity on the Avifauna of Fragmented Polylepis Forest in the Ecuadorian Andes. Biotropica. 45:602–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery PD, Tubaro PL, Cardosa da Silva JM, Peterjohn PG, Herkert JR, Cavalcanti RB. 1999. Conservation of grassland birds in the Western Hemisphere. Stud. Avian Biol. 19:2–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wege CD, Long A. 1995. Key areas for threatened birds in tropics. Cambridge (UK): BirdLife International.
   Google Scholar
• Young KR. 1997. Wildlife conservation in the cultural landscapes of the central Andes. Landsc Urban Plan. 38:137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar