Seasonality in the Brazilian Pantanal influences avian functional diversity

References

• Adis J, Junk WJ. 2002. Terrestrial invertebrates inhabiting lowland river floodplains of Central Amazonia and Central Europe: a review. Freshw Biol. 47:711–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adis J, Marques MI, Wantzen KM. 2001. First observations on the survival strategies of terricolous arthropods in the northern Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Andrias. 15:127–128.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa JM, Santos CF, Mendonça AH, Cerezini MT, Silva SC. 2009. Filtros ecológicos e competição: influência no padrão morfológico foliar. In: Machado G, Prado PIKL, Martini AMZ, editors. Livro do curso de campo Ecologia da Mata Atlântica. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Battirola LD, Adis J, Marques MI, Silva FHO. 2007. Comunidade de artrópodes associada à copa de Attalea phalerata Mart. (Arecaceae), durante o período de cheia no Pantanal de Poconé, MT. Neotrop Entomol. 36:640–651. doi:10.1590/S1519-566X2007000500002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battirola LD, Marques MI, Brescovit AD, Neto GHR, Anjos KC. 2010. Community of ground Araneae (Arthropoda, Arachnida) in a seasonally flooded forest in the northern region of Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Biota Neotropica. 10:173–183. doi:10.1590/S1676-06032010000200022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH. 2000. Bird census techniques. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadotte MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J Appl Ecol. 48:1079–1087. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cianciaruso MV, Silva IA, Batalha MA, Gaston HJ, Petchey OL. 2012. The influence of fire on phylogenetic and functional structure of woody savannas: moving from species to individuals. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 14:205–216. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough Y, Putra DD, Pitopang R, Tscharntke T. 2009. Local and landscape factors determine functional bird diversity in Indonesian cacao agroforestry. Biol Conserv. 142:1032–1041. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bello F, Carmona CP, Mason NWH, Lepš J. 2013b. Which trait dissimilarity for functional diversity: trait means or trait overlap? J Veg Sci. 24:807–819. doi:10.1111/jvs.12008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bello F, Lavorel S, Lavergne S, Albert CH, Boulangeat I, Mazel F, Thuiller W. 2013a. Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: a case study in the French Alps. Ecography. 36:393–402. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bello F, Thuiller W, Lepš J, Choler P, Clément JC, Macek P, Sebastià MT, Lavorel S. 2009. Partitioning of functional diversity reveals the scale and extent of traitconvergence and divergence. J Veg Sci. 20:475–486. doi:10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01042.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Deus FF, Arieira J, Schuchmann KL, Tissiani ASO, Marques MI. 2020. Avian beta-diversity in a Neotropical wetland: effects of flooding and vegetation structure. Wetlands. 40:1513–1527. doi:10.1007/s13157-019-01240-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Develey PF, Peres CA. 2000. Resource seasonality and the structure of mixed species bird flocks in a coastal Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol. 16:33–53. doi:10.1017/S0266467400001255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Cabido M, Casanoves F. 1998. Plant functional traits and environmental filters at a regional scale. J Veg Sci. 9:113–122. doi:10.2307/3237229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Lavorel S, De Bello F, Quetier F, Grigulis K, Robson M. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem servisse assessments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:20684–20689. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704716104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donatelli RJ, Posso SR, Toledo MCB. 2014. Distribution, composition and seasonality of aquatic birds in the Nhecolândia sub-region of South Pantanal, Brazil. Braz J Biol. 74:844–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest SK, Brown JH, Parmenter RR. 2000. Rodents, plants, and precipitation: spatial and temporal dynamics of consumers and resources. Oikos. 88:470–482. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewers RM, Bartlam S, Didham RK. 2013. Altered species interactions at forest edges: contrasting edge effects on bumble bees and their phoretic mite loads in temperate forest remnants. Insect Conserv Divers. 6:598–606. doi:10.1111/icad.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Blomberg SP, Montague-Drake R, Felton A, Stein JA. 2007. Functional richness and relative resilience of bird communities in regions with different land use intensities. Ecosystems. 10:964–974. doi:10.1007/s10021-007-9071-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn DF, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F. 2009. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett. 12:22–33. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01255.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35:557–581. d oi:1 0.1 146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukami T, Beaumont HJE, Zhang XX, Rainey PB. 2007. Immigration history controls diversification in experimental adaptive radiation. Nature. 446:436–439. doi:10.1038/nature05629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukami T, Bezemer TM, Mortimer SR, Van Der Putten WH. 2005. Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol Lett. 8:1283–1290. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furley P. 2006. Tropical savannas. Prog Phys Geogr. 30:105–121. doi:10.1191/0309133306pp474pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galina AB, Gimenes MR. 2006. Riqueza, composição e distribuição espacial da comunidade de aves em um fragmento florestal urbano em Maringá, Norte do Estado do Paraná, Brasil. Acta Scientiarum Biol Sci. 28:379–388.
   Google Scholar
• Grime JP. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol. 86:902–910. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen M, Kissling WD, Rasmussen C, De Aguiar MAM, Brown LE, Cartensen DW, Dos Santos IA, Dupont YL, Edwards FK, Genini J, et al. 2012. Biodiversity, species interactions and ecological networks in a fragmented world. Adv Ecol Res. 46:89–210. d oi:1 0.1 016/B978-0-12- 396992-7.00002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspach J, Fischer J, Ikin K, Stott J, Law BS. 2012. Using trait-based filtering as a predictive framework for conservation: a case study of bats on farms in southeastern Australia. J Appl Ecol. 49:842–850. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin G. 1960. Competitive exclusion principle. Science. 131:1292–1297. doi:10.1126/science.131.3409.1292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman CW. 1998. The Pantanal of Poconé. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hérault B. 2007. Reconciling niche and neutrality through the emergent group approach. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 9:71–78. doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2007.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbel SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen DH, Schoener TW. 1968. Differences in insect abundances and diversity between wetter and drier sites during a tropical dry season. Ecology. 49:96–110. doi:10.2307/1933565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax K. 2005. Function and “functioning” in ecology: what does it mean? Oikos. 111:641–648. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2005.13851.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung V, Violle C, Mondy C, Hoffmann L, Muller S. 2010. Intraspecific variability and trait-based community assembly. J Ecol. 98:1134–1140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01687.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Lourival R, Wittmann F, Kandus P, Lacerda LD, Bozelli RL, Esteves FA, Nunes da Cunha C, Maltchik L, et al. 2014. Brazilian wetlands: their definition, delineation, and classification for research, sustainable management, and protection. Aquat Conser Marine Freshwater Ecosyst. 24:5–22. doi:10.1002/aqc.2386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kembel S, Ackerly D, Blomberg S, Cowan P, Helmus M, Webb C. 2008. Picante: tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. (R package, version 0.2-0). [accessed 2019 Aug 31]. Available from: http://picante.r-forge.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft NJB, Adler PB, Godoy O, James EC, Fuller S, Levine JM. 2015. Community assembly, coexistence, and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct Ecol. 29:592–599. doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Heren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, et al. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett. 10:299–314. doi10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavorel S, Garnier E. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol. 16:545–556. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton JH, Brown VK. 1993. Redundancy in ecosystems. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA, editors. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. New York: Springer. p. 255–270.
   Google Scholar
• Leclerc J, DesGranges JL. 2005. Exploratory multiscale analysis of the fish assemblages and habitat of the lower St. Lawrence River, Quebec, Canada. Biodivers Conserv. 14:1153–1174. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-7839-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Fortin MJ. 2010. Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour. 10:831–844. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02866.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Fortin MJ, Borcard D. 2015. Should the Mantel test be used in spatial analysis? Methods Ecol Evol. 6:1239–1247. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levey DJ. 1988. Spatial and temporal variation in Costa Rican fruit and fruit-eating bird abundance. Ecol Monogr. 58:251–269. doi:10.2307/1942539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loreau M. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos. 91:3–17. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH. 1958. Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology. 39:599–619. doi:10.2307/1931600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH. 1963. An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution. 17:373–387. doi:10.2307/2407089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Levins R. 1967. The limiting similarity convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat. 101:377–385. doi:10.1086/282505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. 1967. The theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE, Dornelas M. 2010. Biological diversity in a changing world. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci. 365:3593–3597. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques MI, Adis J, Battirola LD, Brescovit AD, Silva FHO, Silva JL. 2007. Composição da comunidade de artrópodes associada à copa de Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. (Guttiferae), no Pantanal de Poconé, MT. Amazoniana. 19:131‒148.
   Google Scholar
• Mason NWH, De Bello F, Doležal J, Lepš J. 2011. Niche overlap reveals the effects of competition, disturbance and contrasting assembly processes in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol. 99:788–796. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason NWH, Lanoiselee C, Mouillot D, Irz P, Argillier C. 2007. Functional characters combined with null models reveal inconsistency in mechanisms of species turnover in lacustrine fish communities. Oecologia. 153:441–452. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0727-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB. 2005. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos. 111:112–118. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13886.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield MM, Bonser SP, Morgan JW, Aubin I, McNamara S, Vesk PA. 2010. What does species richness tell us about functional trait diversity? Predictions and evidence for responses of species and functional trait diversity to land-use change. Global Eco Biogeogr. 19:423–431. doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazel F, Davies TJ, Gallien L, Renaud J, Groussin M, Münkemüller T, Thuiller W. 2016. Influence of tree shape and evolutionary time-scale on phylogenetic diversity metrics. Ecography. 39:913–920. doi:10.1111/ecog.01694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:178–185. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. 2010. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Funct Ecol. 24:867–876. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouillot D, Graham NA, Villeger S, Mason NW, Bellwood DR. 2012. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol Evol. 28:167–177. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouillot D, Mason NWH, Wilson JB. 2007. Is the abundance of species determined by their functional traits? A new method with a test using plant communities. Oecologia. 152:729–737. doi:10.1007/s00442-007-0688-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes da Cunha C, Junk WJ. 2004. Year-to-year changes in water level drive the invasion of Vochysia divergens in Pantanal grasslands. Appl Veg Sci. 7:103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes da Cunha C, Junk WJ, Leitão-Filho HF. 2007. Woody vegetation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil: a preliminary typology. Amazoniana. 19:159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Pavoine S, Vallet J, Dufour AB, Gachet S, Daniel H. 2009. On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity. Oikos. 118:391–402. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16668.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol Lett. 5:402–411. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00339.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post E, Forchhammer MC. 2002. Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate. Nature. 420:168–171. doi:10.1038/nature01064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remsen JV Jr., Cadena CD, Jaramillo A, Nores M, Pacheco JF, Robbins MB, Schulenberg TS, Stiles FG, Stotz DF, Zimmer KJ. 2009. A classification of the bird species of South America. American Ornithologists’ Union. [accessed 2019 Aug 1]. Available from: https://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins CS. 1981. Effect of time of day on bird activity. Stud Avian Biol. 6:275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Schleuter D, Daufresne M, Massol F, Argillier C. 2010. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecol Monogr. 80:469–484. doi:10.1890/08-2225.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurin JB, Srivastava DS. 2005. New perspectives on local and regional diversity: beyond saturation. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD, editors. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 399–417.
   Google Scholar
• Signor CA, Pinho JB. 2011. Spatial diversity patterns of birds in a vegetation mosaic of the Pantanal, Mato Grosso, Brazil. Zoologia. 28:725–738. doi:10.1590/S1984-46702011000600005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvertown J. 2004. Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:605–611. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobral FL, Cianciaruso MV. 2016. Functional and phylogenetic structure of forest and savanna bird assemblages across spatial scales. Ecography. 39:533–541. doi:10.1111/ecog.00903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava DS, Vellend M. 2005. Biodiversity-ecosystem function research: is it relevant to conservation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:267–294. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotz DF, Fitzpatrick JW, ParkerIII TA, Moskovits DK. 1996. Neotropical Birds: ecology and Conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs WJ, Wilson JB. 2004. Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. J Ecol. 92:557–567. doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00898.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 1986. Resources, competition and the dynamics of plant communities. In: Crawley MJ, editor. Plant ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Press. p. 51–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 2001. Functional diversity. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego: Academic Press. p. 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Tremlová K, Münzbergová Z. 2007. Importance of species traits for species distribution in fragmented landscapes. Ecology. 88:965–977. doi:10.1890/06-0924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu CH, Dietsch TV, Sodhi NS, Hoehn P, Tylianakis JM. 2008. Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology. 89:944–951. doi:10.1890/07-0455.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubelis DP. 2009. Veredas and their use by birds in the Cerrado, South America: a review. Biota Neotropica. 9:363–374.
   Google Scholar
• Tubelis DP, Cavalcanti RB. 2000. A comparison of bird communities in natural and disturbed non-wetland open habitats in the Cerrado’s central region, Brazil. Bird Conserv Int. 10:331–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. 2008. New multidimensional functional diversity índices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 89:2290–2301. doi:10.1890/07-1206.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violle C, Navas ML, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E. 2007. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos. 116:882–892. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B, Kinzig A, Langridge J. 1999. Plant attribute diversity and ecosystem function: the nature and significance of dominant and minor species. Ecosystems. 2:95–113. doi:10.1007/s100219900062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BH. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv Biol. 6:18–23. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker BH. 1995. Conserving biological diversity through ecosystem resilience. Conserv Biol. 9:1–7. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiher E. 2011. A primer of trait and functional diversity. In: Magurran AE, McGill BA, editors. Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Weiher E, Clarke P, Keddy PA. 1998. Community assembly rules, morphological dispersion, of plant species the coexistence. Oikos. 81:309–322. doi:10.2307/3547051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiher E, Keddy PA. 1995. Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion: new questions from old pattern. Oikos. 74:159–164. doi:10.2307/3545686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiher E, Keddy PA. 1999. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, De La Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology. 95:2027–2027. doi:10.1890/13-1917.1
   Google Scholar
• Zobel M. 1997. The relative role of species pools in determining plant species richness. An alternative explanation of species coexistence? Trends Ecol Evol. 12:266–269. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01096-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar