Floral visiting bees of Humiria balsamifera var. floribunda (Humiriaceae) and its pollen transport network, in a restinga environment

References

• Aguiar CML, Santos GMDM, Martins CF, Presley SJ. 2013. Trophic niche breadth and niche overlap in a guild of flower-visiting bees in a Brazilian dry forest. Apidologie. 44(2):153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón R. 2010. Congruence between visitation and pollen‐transport networks in a California plant–pollinator community. Oikos. 119:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón R, Waser NM, Ollerton J. 2008. Year‐to‐year variation in the topology of a plant–pollinator interaction network. Oikos. 117(12):1796–1807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida-Neto M, Guimarães P, Guimarães PR, Loyola RD, Ulrich W. 2008. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos. 117:1227–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral YT, EM DS, Ribeiro MC, Barreto L. 2019. Landscape structural analysis of the Lençóis Maranhenses national park: implications for conservation. J Nat Conserv. 51:125725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMM G, Dalsgaard B, Olesen JM. 2010. Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks. Ecol Complex. 7:36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini Y, Souza HG, Jacobi CM, Mury FB. 2005. Diversidade e comportamento dos insetos visitantes florais de Stachytarpheta glabra Cham. (Verbenaceae), em uma área de campo ferruginoso. Ouro Preto (MG): Neotrop Entomol Vol. 34:555–564.
   Google Scholar
• ASS DH, Vicentini A, Hopkins MJG, Zartman CE. 2015. Phenotypic differences are not explained by pre-zygotic reproductive barriers in sympatric varieties of the Humiria balsamifera complex (Humiriaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 301:1767–1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascompte J, Jordano P. 2007. Plant-animal mutualistic networks: the architecture of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38:567–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascompte J, Jordano P, Melián CJ, Olesen JM. 2003. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100:9383–9387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa KS. 1990. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical rain forests. Ann Rev Ecol System. 21:399–422.
   Google Scholar
• Biesmeijer JC, Smeets MJAP, Richter JAP, Sommeijer MJ. 1999. Nectar foraging by stingless bees in Costa Rica: botanical and climatological influences on sugar concentration of nectar collected by Melipona. Apidologie. 30:43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blüthgen N, Fründ J, Vázquez DP, Menzel F. 2008. What do interaction network metrics tell us about specialization and biological traits. Ecology. 89:3387–3399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch J, Martín González AM, Rodrigo A, Navarro D. 2009. Plant–pollinator networks: adding the pollinator’s perspective. Ecol Lett. 12:409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AMC, Oliveira PE. 2010. Estrutura da guilda de abelhas visitantes de Matayba guianensis Aubl. (Sapindaceae) em vegetação do cerrado. Oecol Aust. 14:40–66.
   Google Scholar
• Castro ACL, Piorski NM 2002. Plano de Manejo do Parque Nacional dos Lençóis Maranhenses. [cited 2016 Oct 10]. Available from: http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/unidadesdeconservacao/biomas-brasileiros/marinho/unidades-de-conservacao-marinho/2264-parna-dos-lencois-maranhenses
   Google Scholar
• Chacoff NP, Vázquez DP, Lomáscolo SB, Stevani EL, Dorado J, Padrón B. 2012. Evaluating sampling completeness in a desert plant–pollinator network. J Anim Ecol. 81:190–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa JAS, Ramalho M. 2001. Ecologia da polinização em ambientes de Duna Tropical (APA do Abaeté, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil). Sitientibus Série Ciências Biológicas. 1:135–145.
   Google Scholar
• CRIA. 2018. Specieslink – simple search. [cited 2019 Jul 18]. Available from: http://www.splink.org.br/index
   Google Scholar
• Cuatrecasas J. 1961. A taxonomic revision of the Humiriaceae. 1st ed. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• De Almeida NM, de Castro CC, de Lima Leite AV, Novo RR, Machado IC. 2013. Enantiostyly in Chamaecrista ramosa (Fabaceae‐Caesalpinioideae): floral morphology, pollen transfer dynamics and breeding system. Plant Biol. 15:369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz MEDR, Buschini MLT. 2015. Pollen analysis and interaction networks of floral visitor bees of Eugenia uniflora L. (Myrtaceae), in Atlantic Forest areas in southern Brazil. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 9:623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer FC. 2002. The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol. 47:917–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier LA. 1974. Un método cuantitativo para la medición de características fenológicas en árboles. Turrialba. 24:422–423.
   Google Scholar
• Gostinski LF, Carvalho GCA, MMC R, de Albuquerque PMC. 2016. Species richness and activity pattern of bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) in the restinga area of Lençóis Maranhenses National Park, Barreirinhas, Maranhão, Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 60:319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães PR, Guimarães P. 2006. Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices. Environ Modell Softw. 21:1512–1513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer W, Crichyno J, Pires AC. 2004. Sustentabilidade da urbanização em áreas de restinga: uma proposta de avaliação pós-ocupação. Paisagem e Ambiente 19: 49–65. doi:10.11606/.2359-5361.v0i19p49-65
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins MJG, Hopkins HCF, Sothers CA. 2000. Nocturnal pollination of Parkia velutina by Megalopta bees in Amazonia and its possible significance in the evolution of chiropterophily. J Trop Ecol. 16:733–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordano P. 1987. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Amer Nat. 129:657–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. 1st ed. Niwot (CO): University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinert AMP, Giannini TC. 2012. Generalist bee species on Brazilian bee-plant interaction networks. Psyche. 2012:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach WL. 2011. Oriana – circular Statistics for Windows. [online]. Wales: Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, ver. 4. [ [cited 2019 May 21]].
   Google Scholar
• Lando F, Lustosa PR, CFP DL, Buschini MLT. 2018. Bee diversity and Solanum didymum (Solanaceae) flower–visitor network in an Atlantic Forest Fragment in Southern Brazil. Diversity. 10:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt SD, Blüthgen N. 2012. The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies. Apidologie. 43:449–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louveaux J, Maurizio A, Vorwohl G. 1978. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 51: 125–138. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1978.11097714
   Google Scholar
• Machado NC. 2013. Aspectos fenológicos de espécies arbóreas e arbustivas em formações vegetacionais abertas no Parque Nacional da Restinga de Jurubatiba, Carapebus, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil [dissertation]. [Rio de Janeiro (RJ)]: Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Madeira JA, Wilson Fernandes G. 1999. Reproductive phenology of sympatric taxa of Chamaecrista (Leguminosae) in Serra do Cipó, Brazil. J Trop Ecol. 15:463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes FN, Valente RDM, MMC R, Esposito MC. 2017. The floral biology and reproductive system of Mauritia flexuosa (Arecaceae) in a restinga environment in northeastern Brazil. Brittonia. 69:11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michener CD. 2007. The bees of the world. 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miñarro M, García D. 2018. Complementarity and redundancy in the functional niche of cider apple pollinators. Apidologie. 49:789–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller DA. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp xantiana. Oecologia. 142:1432–1939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira MM, Miranda AS, de Lima HA. 2017. Agarista revoluta (Ericaceae): a generalist plant with self-compatible and self-incompatible individuals. Flora. 234:7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieh JC. 2004. Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie. 35:159–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Dupont YL, Jordano P. 2006. The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. J Theor Biol. 240:270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos. 120:321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigozzo CM, Viana BF. 2010. Estrutura da rede de interações entre flores e abelhas em ambiente de caatinga. Oecol Austral. 14:100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto RS, Albuquerque PMC, Rêgo MMC. 2014. Pollen analysis of food pots stored by Melipona subnitida Ducke (Hymenoptera: apidae) in a restinga area. Sociobiology 61: 461–469. doi:10.13102/sociobiology.v61i4.461-469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatto LP, Chaud-Netto J, Alves-Junior VV. 2014. Influence of abiotic factors and floral resource availability on daily foraging activity of bees. J Insect Behav. 27:593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popic TJ, Wardle GM, Davila YC. 2013. Flower‐visitor networks only partially predict the function of pollen transport by bees. Austral Ecol. 38:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R development core team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [online]. 2013. [cited 2019 Apr 19]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rabelo LS, Vilhena AMGF, Bastos EMAF, Aguiar CML, Augusto SC. 2015. Oil-collecting bee–flower interaction network: do bee size and anther type influence the use of pollen sources? Apidologie. 46:465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roubik DW, Buchmann SL. 1984. Nectar selection by Melipona and Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: apidae) and the ecology of nectar intake by bee colonies in a tropical forest. Oecologia. 61:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo L, Danforth B. 2017. Pollen preferences among the bee species visiting apple (Malus pumila) in New York. Apidologie. 48:806–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakagami SF, Laroca S, Moure JS. 1967. Wild bee biocenotics in São José dos Pinhais (PR), South Brazil. Preliminary Report. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ. 16:253–291.
   Google Scholar
• Silva FOD, Viana BF, Pigozzo CM. 2007. Floração, produção de néctar e abelhas visitantes de Eriope blanchetii (Lamiaceae) em dunas costeiras, Nordeste do Brasil. Iheringia, Sér. Zool. 97:87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Viana BF, da Silva FO, Kleinert AMP. 2006. A flora apícola de uma área restrita de dunas litorâneas, Abaeté, Salvador, Bahia. Rev Bras Bot. 29:13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Viana BF, Kleinert AMP. 2006. Structure of bee-flower system in the coastal sand dune of Abaeté, northeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Entomol. 50:53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianna MR, CFP DL, Kleinert AMP. 2014. Interaction networks in a Brazilian cerrado: what changes when you add palynological information to floral visitor data? Apidologie. 45:418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhena AMGF, Rabelo LS, Bastos EMAF, Augusto SC. 2012. Acerola pollinators in the savanna of Central Brazil: temporal variations in oil-collecting bee richness and a mutualistic network. Apidologie. 43:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VLG DB, Pinheiro M, Sazima M. 2010. Sophora tomentosa e Crotalaria vitellina (Fabaceae): biologia reprodutiva e interações com abelhas na restinga de Ubatuba, São Paulo. Biota Neotropica. 10:185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar