Vocal repertoire and acoustic variation in a treefrog (Boana ericae) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae) endemic to the Chapada dos Veadeiros, Central Brazil

References

• Andreani TL, Bastos RP, Dias TM, Prado CPA, Morais AR. 2020. Acoustic variability among male gladiator frogs, Boana goiana (Lutz, 1968) (Anura: Hylidae): an 18-year analysis across several reproductive seasons. Amphib-reptil. 42:43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos RP, Andreani TL, Santos CE, Souza AO, Morais AR. 2021. Conhecimento atual e perspectivas futuras sobre estudos de bioacústica em espécies de anuros do Brasil. In L. F. Toledo (ed.), Herpetologia Brasileira Contemporânea. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia. Vol. Chapter 6 , (pp. 70–80). São Paulo (SP).
   Google Scholar
• Batista VG, Gambale PG, Lourenço-de-Moraes R, Campos RM, Bastos RP. 2015. Vocalizations of two species of the Hypsiboas pulchellus group (Anura: Hylidae) with comments on this species group. North-Western J Zool. 11:253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bee MA, Kozich CE, Blackwell KJ, Gerhardt HC. 2001. Individual variation in advertisement call of territorial male Green Frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination. Ethology. 107:65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bee MA, Reichert MS, Tumulty J. 2016. Assessment and recognition of rivals in anuran contests. Adv Study Behav. 48:161–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bioacustics Research Program. 2011. Raven Pro: interactive sound analyses software. Version 1.4. www.birds.cornell.edu/raven.
   Google Scholar
• Caramaschi U, Bastos RP, Colli G, Silvano D 2004. Hypsiboas ericae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; [accessed 02 March 2022] https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T55475A11302121.en.
   Google Scholar
• Caramaschi U, Cruz CAG. 2000. Duas espécies novas de Hyla Laurenti, 1768 do Estado de Goiás, Brasil (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Bol Mus Nac Rio de Janeiro, Zoo. 422:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado DB, Haddad CFB. 2015. Calling activity and vocal repertoire of Hypsiboas prasinus (Anura, Hylidae), a treefrog from the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Herpetologica. 71:88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escalona M, Ivo Simões P, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Castroviejo-Fisher S. 2019. Neotropical frogs and mating songs: The evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs. J Evol Biol. 32(2):163–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faivovich J, Pinheiro PDP, Lyra ML, Pereyra MO, Baldo D, Muñoz A, Reichle S, Brandão RA, Giaretta AA, Mtc T, et al. 2020. Phylogenetic relationships of the Boana pulchella group (Anura: Hylidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 155:106981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambale PG, Signorelli L, Bastos RP. 2014. Individual variation in the advertisement calls of a Neotropical treefrog (Scinax constrictus). Amphib-reptil. 35:271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PCA, Haddad CFB. 2008. Vocalização e comentários sobre as relações de parentesco de Hypsiboas ericae (Amphibia; Hylidae). Iheringia Ser Zool. 98(1):161–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gasser H, Amezquita A, Hödl W. 2009. Who is calling? Intraspecific call variation in the aromobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Ethology. 115(6):596–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt HC. 1991. Female mate choice in tree frogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Anim Behav. 42:615–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt HC, Huber F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhardt HC, Watson GF. 1995. Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog. Anim Behav. 50:1187–1191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs JP, Breisch AR. 2001. Climate warming and calling phenology of frogs near Ithaca, New York, 1900-1999. Conserv Biol. 15(4):1175–1178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Costa NQ, Bastos RP. 2018. Interspecific behaviour between two species of Boana (Anura: Hylidae) from central Brazil. Herpetol Notes. 11:489–493.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra V, Lingnau R, Bastos RP. 2017. Vocalizations and bioacoustic analysis of Boana jaguariaivensis (Caramaschi, Cruz, and Segalla, 2010) (Anura: Hylidae). South Am J Herpetol. 12(1):34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães L, Bastos RP. 2003. Vocalizações e interações acústicas em Hyla raniceps (Anura, Hylidae) durante a atividade reprodutiva. Iheringia Ser Zool. 90(3):149–158. https://www.scielo.br/j/isz/a/xFSx97bfHQgJsPB7r464QRK/?lang=pt
   Google Scholar
• Kaefer I, Lima A. 2012. Sexual signals of the Amazonian frog Allobates paleovarzensis: geographic variation and stereotypy of acoustic traits. Behaviour. 149:15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler J, Jansen M, Rodríguez A, Philippe JRK, Toledo LF, Emmerich M, Glaw F, Haddad CFB, Rödel MO, Vences M. 2017. The use of bioacoustics in anuran taxonomy: theory, terminology, methods, and recommendations for best practice. Zootaxa. 42511(11):1–124.
   Google Scholar
• Márquez R, Eckhout XR. 2006. Advertisement calls of six species of anurans from Bali, Republic of Indonesia. J Nat Hist. 40:571–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais AR, Batista VG, Gambale PG, Signorelli L, Bastos RP. 2012. Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual recognition. Herpetol J. 22:249–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narins PM, Meenderink SWF. 2014. Climate change and frog calls: long term correlations along a tropical altitudinal gradient. Proc Royal Soc B. 281:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert MS. 2013. Patterns of variability are consistent across signal types in the treefrog Dendropsophus ebraccatus. Biol J Linn Soc. 109:131–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MJ. 1980. Female mate choice in neotropical frogs. Science. 209:523–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan MJ. 1988. Energy, calling and selection. Am Zool. 28:885–898.
   Google Scholar
• Segalla MV, Berneck B, Canedo C, Caramaschi U, Cruz CAG, Garcia PCA, Grant T, Haddad CFB, ACC L, Mângia S, et al. 2021. List of Brazilian amphibians. Herpetologia Brasileira. 10(1):121–216.
   Google Scholar
• Serrano JM, Penna M, Soto-Azat C. 2019. Individual and population variation of linear and non-linear components of the advertisement call of Darwin’s frog (Rhinoderma darwinii). Bioacoustics. 5:572–589.
   Google Scholar
• Signorelli L, Morais AR, Vieira RRS, Bastos RP. 2016. Vocalizations of Hypsiboas goianus (Lutz, 1968) (Anura: Hylidae) in Central Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 51(6):188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Toledo LF, Martins IA, Bruschi DP, Passos MA, Alexandre C, Haddad CFB. 2014. The anuran calling repertoire in the light of social context. Acta Ethol. 18:87–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turin RAF, Nali RC, Prado CPA. 2018. Intraspecific call variation in a Neotropical gladiator frog with a complex advertisement call. Amphib-reptil. 39(1):31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz-Silva W, Maciel NM, Nomura F, Morais AR, Guerra V, Santos DL, Andrade SP, Oliveira AAB, Brandão RA, Bastos RP. 2020. Guia de identificação das espécies de anfíbios (Anura e Gymnophiona) do estado de Goiás e do Distrito Federal, Brasil Central. 1st ed. Curitiba: Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira RRS, Batista VG, Bastos RP. 2016. Acoustic communication in two species of the Hypsiboas albopunctatus group (Anura: Hylidae) in sympatry and allopatry. Zoologia. 33:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 1988. The effect of social interactions on anuran vocal behavior. In: Fritzsch B, Ryan M, Wilczynski W, Walkowiak W, Hetherington T, editors. The evolution of the Amphibian auditory system. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. pp 433–453.
   Google Scholar
• Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behaviour of amphibians. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar