Large sampling effort is not related to richness and geographic distribution of Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) in the Brazilian Savannah

References

• Agostinho AA, Thomaz SM, Gomes LC. 2005. Conservação da biodiversidade em águas continentais do Brasil. Megadiversidade. 1(1):70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R. 2006. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol. 43(6):1223–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves ACB, Silvano J. 2006. Avaliação da sensibilidade de Daphnia magna Straus, 1820 (Cladócera, Crustácea) ao dicromato de potássio. Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (Impresso). 65(1):59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade AFA, Velazco SJE, Júnior PDM. 2020. ENMTML: an R package for a straightforward construction of complex ecological niche models. Environ Model Softw. 125:104615. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo MB, New M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol. 22(1):42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benício RA, da Silva GR, Fonseca MG. 2014. Comunidade de anuros em uma área de ecótono no nordeste do Brasil. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi-Ciências Naturais. 9(3):511–517.
   Google Scholar
• Branstrator DK, Beranek AE, Brown ME, Hembre LK, Engstrom DR. 2017. Colonization dynamics of the invasive predatory cladoceran, Bythotrephes longimanus, inferred from sediment records. Limnol Oceanogr. 62(3):1096–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito DQ. 2014. Avaliação ecotoxicológica das cinzas de queimadas do cerrado em ambientes aquáticos. [Dissertação]. [Brasília (DF)]: Universidade de Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Brito MTDS, Diniz LP, Pozzobom UM, Landeiro VL, Sousa FDR. 2020. Biodiversity of Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil: new records and species richness in hydrographic regions. Ann Limnol-Int J Limnol. 56(1):7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli GR, Vieira CR, Dianese JC. 2020. Biodiversity and conservation of the Cerrado: recent advances and old challenges. Biodivers Conserv. 29(5):1465–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte CE, Rossa-Feres DDC. 2006. Diversidade e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibia, Anura) em são José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 23(1):162–175.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Segundo HPD. 2018. Diagnóstico ecotoxicológico do rio Apodi-Mossoró (RN) utilizando as espécies zooplanctônicas Ceriodaphnia dubia e Daphnia similis (Cladocera, Crustacea). Mossoró (RN): Monografia.
   Google Scholar
• Dalapicolla J. 2016. Tutorial de modelos de distribuição de espécies: guia prático usando o MaxEnt e o ArcGIS 10. Vitória: Laboratório de Mastozoologia e Biogeografia. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. [ Retrieved, v. 6].
   Google Scholar
• de Marco P, Nóbrega CC. 2018. Evaluating collinearity effects on species distribution models: an approach based on virtual species simulation. PloS One. 13(9):e0202403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz-Filho JAF, Loyola RD, Raia P, Mooers AO, Bini LM. 2013. Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 28(12):689–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz LP, Morais Júnior CSD, Medeiros IL, Silva AJD, Araújo AP, Silva TA, Melo Júnior MD. 2020. Distribution of planktonic microcrustaceans (Cladocera and Copepoda) in lentic and lotic environments from the semiarid region in northeastern Brazil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 110. doi:10.1590/1678-4766e2020002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont HJ, Negrea SV. 2002. Guides to the Identification of the Microinvertebrates of the continental waters of the world. Vol. 19, 398. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 1997. Manual de identificação de cladóceros límnicos do Brasil (Vol. 1). Brasília: Universa.
   Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2000. Brazilian cladoceran studies: where do we stand. Nauplius. 8(1):117–131.
   Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2007. Phytophilous cladocerans (Crustacea, Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) from Paranã River Valley, Goiás, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. 24(2):344–352.
   Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2014. Ephemeroporus quasimodo sp. nov. (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae), a new species from the Brazilian Cerrado. Zootaxa. 3821(1):88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro, LMA. Cladóceros do Brasil: famílias Chydoridae e Eurycecidae [Internet]. 2008. [cited 2022 Oct 18]. https://cladocera.wordpress.com
   Google Scholar
• Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santangelo JM, Lopes PM, Bozelli RL. 2010. A new report of Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820) (Cladocera, Anomopoda) in South America. Braz J Biol. 70:225–226. doi:10.1590/S1519-69842010000100031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ. 2017. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.6-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 25(15):1965–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2016. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (H ill numbers). Methods Ecol Evol. 7(12):1451–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes AC, Orr MC, Ma K, Costello MJ, Waller J, Provoost T, Yang Q, Zhu C, Qiao H. 2021. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography. 44(9):1259–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2022 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/downloads-geociencias.html
   Google Scholar
• Klink CA, Machado RB. 2005. Conservation of the Brazilian cerrado. Conserv biol. 19(3):707–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahr DJ, Souza MBG. 2011. Occurrence of the lobose testate amoeba Pseudonebela africana (Amoebozoa, Arcellinida) in the Brazilian “cerrado.” Eur J Protistol. 47(3):231–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo JM, Gutiérrez‐Cánovas C, Fox R, Dennis RL, Sánchez‐Fernández D. 2021. Species traits influence the process of biodiversity inventorying: a case study using the British butterfly database. Insect Conserv Divers. 14(6):748–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macêdo RL, Sousa FDR, Dumont HJ, Rietzler AC, Rocha O, Elmoor-Loureiro L. 2022. Climate change and niche unfilling tend to favor range expansion of Moina macrocopa Straus 1820, a potentially invasive cladoceran in temporary waters. Hidrobiologia. 849(17–18):4015–4027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira RA, Mansano ADS, Silva LCD, Rocha O. 2014. A comparative study of the acute toxicity of the herbicide atrazine to cladocerans Daphnia magna, Ceriodaphnia silvestrii and Macrothrix flabelligera. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 26(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Motta JPA 2020 Metacomunidade de macroinvertebrados bentônicos em área de exploração agrícola no cerrado [Dissertação Mestrado]. [Brasília]: Universidade de Brasília
   Google Scholar
• Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GA, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403(6772):853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira U, Paglia AP, Brescovit AD, de Carvalho CJB, Silva DP, Rezende DT, Leite FSF, Batista JAN, Barbosa JPPP, Stehmann JR, et al. 2016. The strong influence of collection bias on biodiversity knowledge shortfalls of B razilian terrestrial biodiversity. Divers Distrib. 22(12):1232–1244. doi:10.1111/ddi.12489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padovesi-Fonseca C. 2005. Caracterização dos ecossistemas aquáticos do Cerrado. Cerrado: ecologia, biodiversidade e conservação. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente. p. 422–425.
   Google Scholar
• Pelicice FM, Agostinho AA, Akama A, Filho JDA, Azevedo-Santos VM, Barbosa MVM, Bini LM, Brito MFG, Candeiro CRA, Caramaschi EP, et al. 2021. Large-scale degradation of the Tocantins-Araguaia River basin. Environ Manage. 1–8. doi:10.1007/s00267-021-01513-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qgis [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2022 Oct 18]. Available from: https://qgis.org/pt_BR/site/index.html
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [accessed 10 May 2021]. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JW. 1994. Latitudinal diversity patterns of continental benthic copepod species assemblages in the Americas. Hydrobiologia. 292(1):341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JF, Walter BMT. 2008. As principais fitofisionomias do Cerrado. In: Sano SM, Almeida SP, Ribeiro JF, editors. Cerrado, Ecologia e Flora. Planaltina: Embrapa Cerrados. p. 151–199.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha O, Santos-Wisniewski MJ, Matsumura-Tundisi T. 2011. Checklist de Cladocera de água doce do Estado de São Paulo. Biota Neotropica. 11(suppl 1):571–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos-Wisniewski MJD, Matsumura-Tundisi T, Negreiros NF, Silva LCD, Santos RMD, Rocha O. 2011. O estado atual do conhecimento da diversidade dos Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) nas águas doces do estado de Minas Gerais. Biota Neotropica. 11(3):287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sastre P, Lobo JM. 2009. Taxonomist survey biases and the unveiling of biodiversity patterns. Biol Conserv. 142(2):462–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaramuzza CAM, Sano EE, Adami M, Bolfe EL, Coutinho AC, Esquerdo JCDM, Maurando LEP, Narvaes IS, Oliveira-Filho FJB, Rosa R, et al. 2017. Land-use and land-cover mapping of the Brazilian Cerrado based mainly on Landsat-8 satellite images. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia. 69(6):1041–1051. doi:10.14393/rbcv69n6-44309
   Google Scholar
• Sinev AY, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2010. Three new species of chydorid cladocerans of subfamily Aloninae (Branchipoda: Anomopoda: Chydoridae) from Brazil. Zootaxa. 2390(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2008. Cladóceros fitófilos (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) do Parque Nacional das Emas, estado de Goiás. Biota Neotropica. 8(1):159–166.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA 2011. First report of Ilyocryptus paranaensis inarmatus Kotov, Elíaz-Gutiérrez & Gutiérrez-Aguirre, 2001 (Cladocera, Anomopoda, Ilyocryptidae) in South America. Braz J Biol. 71:1025–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2012. How many species of cladocerans (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) are found in Brazilian Federal district? Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia. 24(4):351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA. 2013. Cladocerans (Crustacea: Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) of the Sempre Vivas National Park, Espinhaço Range, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Check List. 9(1):4.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Debastiani-Junior JR, Mugnai R, Senna A. 2015b. New records of Anthalona acuta Van Damme, Sinev & Dumont 2011 and Anthalona brandorffi (Sinev & Hollwedel, 2002) in Brazil, with description of a new species of the simplex-branch (Crustacea: Cladocera: Chydoridae). Zootaxa. 4044(2):224–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Mendonça-Galvão LD. 2013. Cladocerans (Crustacea, Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) from Cerrado of Central Brazil: inventory of phytophilous community in natural wetlands. Biota Neotropica. 13(3):222–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Mendonça-Galvão L, Panarelli EA, Arruda TF, Fagundes BG. 2018. Cladoceran (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) biodiversity of protected areas in a Brazilian hotspot. Invertebrate Zool. 15(3):309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, Quadra A, Senna AR. 2014. First record of Cladocera (Crustacea: Chydoridae) from Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, Southeastern Brazil. Check List. 10(3):665–668.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santos S. 2015a. Redescription of Coronatella poppei (Richard, 1897) (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Chydoridae) and a revision of the genus in Brazil, with descriptions of new taxa. Zootaxa. 3955(2):211–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Santos S. 2016. New findings of Hexalona-branch representatives in Brazil, with a description of Prenda gen. nov. (Crustacea: Anomopoda: Aloninae). J Nat Hist. 50(43–44):2727–2768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, Souza MBG. 2009. A contribution to the fauna of Cladocera (Branchiopoda) from Ceará state, Brazil. Nauplius. 17(2):101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa FDR, Palaoro AV, Elmoor-Loureiro LM, Kotov AA. 2017. Predicting the invasive potential of the cladoceran Daphnia lumholtzi Sars, 1885 (Crustacea: Cladocera: Daphniidae) in the Neotropics: are generalists threatened and relicts protected by their life-history traits. J Limnology. 76(2):272–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza RCCLD, Calazans SH, Silva EP. 2009. Impacto das espécies invasoras no ambiente aquático. Ciência e cultura. 61(1):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Velazco SJE, Villalobos F, Galvão F, de Marco Júnior P. 2019. A dark scenario for Cerrado plant species: effects of future climate, land use and protected areas ineffectiveness. Divers Distrib. 25(4):660–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira OQ, Oliveira TGD. 2020. Riqueza de espécies de mamíferos não-voadores no meio norte ecotonal brasileiro: checklist para o Estado do Maranhão. Biota Neotropica. 20(2). doi: 10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2019-0912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wantzen KM, Siqueira A, Cunha CD, Pereira de Sa MD. 2006. Stream-valley systems of the Brazilian Cerrado: impact assessment and conservation scheme. Aquat Conserv. 16(7):713–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanata LH, Güntzel AM, Rodrigues TAR, Soares MP, Silva WMD. 2017. Checklist de Cladocera (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 107:01–09. 10.1590/1678-4766e2017113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu GP, Peterson AT. 2017. Do consensus models outperform individual models? Transferability evaluations of diverse modeling approaches for an invasive moth. Biol Invasions. 19(9):2519–2532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar