Advanced search
Publication Cover
Neuro-Ophthalmology Volume 47, 2023 - Issue 5-6
Submit an article Journal homepage
140
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Agreement Between Virtual Reality Perimetry and Static Automated Perimetry in Various Neuro-Ophthalmological Conditions: A Pilot Study

Akshay Badakerea Consultant Ophthalmologist, Child Sight Institute, Jasti V Ramanamma Children’s Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, HyderabadORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0747-6653View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Amir Ali Mirb Junior Optometrist, Center For Technology Innovation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2021-6437View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Rahul Negib Junior Optometrist, Center For Technology Innovation, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, IndiaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0009-0008-7832-4407View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sampada Kulkarnic Consultant Ophthalmologist, Child Sight Institute, Jasti V Ramanamma Childrens’ Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, HyderabadORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8852-5722View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Ramesh Kekunnayad Head, Child Sight Institute, Jasti V Ramanamma Childrens’ Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, HyderabadORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-2300View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Virender Sachdevae Consultant Ophthalmologist, Child Sight Institute, Nimmagadda Prasad Children’s Eye Care Centre, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Vishakhapatnam, IndiaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1927-6643View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 255-261 | Received 14 Dec 2022, Accepted 22 Aug 2023, Published online: 16 Oct 2023

References

  • Kedar S, Ghate D, Corbett JJ. Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59(2):103–109. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.77013.
  • Hepworth LR, Rowe FJ. Programme choice for perimetry in neurological conditions (PoPin): a systematic review of perimetry options and patterns of visual field loss. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):241. doi:10.1186/s12886-018-0912-1.
  • Wong SH, Plant GT. How to interpret visual fields. Pract Neurol. 2015;15(5):374–381. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2015-001155. Epub July 3, 2015.
  • Khoury JM, Donahue SP, Lavin PJ, Tsai JC. Comparison of 24-2 and 30-2 perimetry in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies. J Neuroophthalmol. 1999;19(2):100–108. doi:10.1097/00041327-199906000-00004. PMID: 10380130.
  • Szatmáry G, Biousse V, Newman NJ. Can Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm fast perimetry be used as an alternative to Goldmann perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic practice? Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(9):1162–1173. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.9.1162. PMID: 12215089.
  • Tsapakis S, Papaconstantinou D, Diagourtas A, Droutsas K, Andreanos K, Moschos MM, et al. Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:1431–1443. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S131160. PMID: 28848325.
  • Johnson CA, Thapa S, George Kong YX, Robin AL. Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:147–154. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.007. PMID: 28844641.
  • Vingrys AJ, Healey JK, Liew S, Saharinen V, Tran M, Wu W, et al. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(4):3. doi:10.1167/tvst.5.4.3. PMID: 27486553.
  • Mees L, Upadhyaya S, Kumar P, Kotawala S, Haran S, Rajasekar S. Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(2):86–91. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.
  • Matsumoto C, Yamao S, Nomoto H, et al. Visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter ‘imo’. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0161974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161974. PMID: 27564382.
  • McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031. PMID: 23092060.
  • Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.