Assessment of the Quality, Accountability, and Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Optic Neuritis

References

• Toosy AT, Mason DF, Miller DH. Optic neuritis. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(1):83–99. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70259-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pau D, Al Zubidi N, Yalamanchili S, Plant GT, Lee AG. Optic neuritis. Eye. 2011;25(7):833–842. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcer LJ. Optic neuritis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(12):1273–1280. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp053247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams PN, Plant GT. Optic neuritis: a review. Int MS J. 2009;16:82–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtzke JF. Optic neuritis or multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 1985;42(7):704–710. doi:10.1001/archneur.1985.04060070098026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braithwaite T, Subramanian A, Petzold A, et al. Trends in optic neuritis incidence and prevalence in the UK and association with systemic and neurologic disease. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(12):1514–1523. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.3502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Siva A, Cross SA, O’Brien PC, Kurland LT. Optic neuritis: a population-based study in olmsted county, Minnesota. Neurology. 1995;45(2):244–250. doi:10.1212/wnl.45.2.244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy AK, Nobrega FT, Kurland LT. Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. An epidemiologic study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87(2):135–139. doi:10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020137004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galetta SL, Villoslada P, Levin N, et al. Acute optic neuritis. Unmet clinical needs and model for new therapies. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. 2015;2(4):e135. doi:10.1212/nxi.0000000000000135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visual function 15 years after optic neuritis: a final follow-up report from the optic neuritis treatment trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):1079–1082.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):180–185. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuyler KS, Knight KM. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics web site. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5(4):e24. doi:10.2196/jmir.5.4.e24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvillo J, Roman I, Roa LM. How technology is empowering patients? A literature review. Health Expectations. 2015;18(5):643–652. doi:10.1111/hex.12089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JJ, Kang K-A, Wang MP, et al. Associations between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and belief with COVID-19 knowledge and preventive behaviors: cross-sectional online study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e22205. doi:10.2196/22205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kher A, Johnson S, Griffith R. Readability assessment of online patient education material on congestive heart failure. Adv Prev Med. 2017;2017:9780317. doi:10.1155/2017/9780317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmunds MR, Barry RJ, Denniston AK. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1610–1616. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi NA, Patel NA, Kuriyan AE, Sridhar J. Assessment of the quality, content, and readability of freely available online information for patients regarding diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(11):1240–1245. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.3116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Gopali R, Reddy A, Patel KK. The readability of ophthalmological patient education materials provided by major academic hospitals. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022;37(1):71–76. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1915341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AJ, Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi NA, Venkateswaran N, Sridhar J. Evaluation of the content, quality, and readability of patient accessible online resources regarding cataracts. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;36(5–6):384–391. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1893758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi N, Topilow N, Patel N, Kuriyan A, Sridhar J. Assessing the quality, content, and readability of freely available online information for patients regarding age-related macular degeneration. Semin Ophthalmol. 2021;36(5–6):400–405. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1893761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor–let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244–1245. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MB, Stern C, Flanagan EP, et al. Population-based incidence of optic neuritis in the era of aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;220:110–114. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.07.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite T, Wiegerinck N, Petzold A, Denniston A. Vision loss from atypical optic neuritis: patient and physician perspectives. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(2):215–220. doi:10.1007/s40123-020-00247-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobe JD, Beck RW, Moke PS, Cleary PA. Contrast sensitivity and other vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(5):547–553. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75429-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubbe D, Cohen S, Yen RW, et al. Does pictorial health information improve health behaviours and other outcomes? A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e023300. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau D, Ogbogu U, Taylor B, Stafinski T, Menon D, Caulfield T. Stem cell clinics online: the direct-to-consumer portrayal of stem cell medicine. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(6):591–594. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendran N, Amissah-Arthur K, Groppe M, Scotcher S. Internet use by ophthalmology patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(3):378–379. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.170324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redick DW, Hwang JC, Kloosterboer A, et al. Content, readability, and accountability of freely available online information for patients regarding epiretinal membranes. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022;37(1):67–70. doi:10.1080/08820538.2021.1913192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos PJF, Daar DA, Badeau A, Leis A. Readability of online materials for Dupuytren’s contracture. J Hand Ther. 2018;31(4):472–479. doi:10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nghiem AZ, Mahmoud Y, Som R. Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. The Breast. 2016;25:34–37. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basch CH, Ethan D, MacLean SA, Fera J, Garcia P, Basch CE. Readability of prostate cancer information online: a cross-sectional study. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1665–1669. doi:10.1177/1557988318780864 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AM, Muir KW, Rosdahl JA. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):133. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0315-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paolino L, Genser L, Fritsch S, De’ Angelis N, Azoulay D, Lazzati A. The web-surfing bariatic patient: the role of the internet in the decision-making process. Obes Surg. 2015;25(4):738–743. doi:10.1007/s11695-015-1578-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterlin BL, Gambini-Suarez E, Lidicker J, Levin M. An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites. Headache. 2008;48(3):378–384. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00951.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younis J, Salerno G, Chaudhary A, et al. Reduction in hospital reattendance due to improved preoperative patient education following hemorrhoidectomy. J Healthc Qual. 2013;35(6):24–29. doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2012.00201.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse BW, Moser RP, Rutten LJ. Surveys of physicians and electronic health information. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(9):859–860. doi:10.1056/NEJMc0909595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calixte R, Rivera A, Oridota O, Beauchamp W, Camacho-Rivera M. Social and demographic patterns of health-related internet use among adults in the United States: a secondary data analysis of the health information national trends survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6856. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renahy E, Parizot I, Chauvin P. Determinants of the frequency of online health information seeking: results of a web-based survey conducted in France in 2007. Inform Health Soc Care. 2010;35(1):25–39. doi:10.3109/17538150903358784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainer MI, Tsai N, Komura ST, Chiu CL. Fatal hepatorenal failure associated with hydrazine sulfate. Ann Int Med. 2000;133(11):877–880. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-11-200012050-00011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Kamal AM, Kabir A, et al. COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: the need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251605. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creating patient education materials. https://www.muhclibraries.ca/training-and-guides/creating-patient-education-materials/. Accessed July 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Matti AI, Keane MC, McCarl H, Klaer P, Chen CS. Patients’ knowledge and perception on optic neuritis management before and after an information session. BMC Ophthalmol. 2010;10(1):7. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-10-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar