617
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Preliminary evaluation of the Well-being in Pregnancy (WiP) questionnaire

, , &
Pages 133-142 | Received 02 Jul 2015, Accepted 12 Jan 2017, Published online: 15 Feb 2017

References

  • Diener E. Assessing subjective well-being: progress and opportunities. In: Diener E, ed. Assessing well-being social indicators. Research Series Number 39. Springer; 2009.
  • Scott Huebner E, Diener C. Research on life satisfaction of children and youth: implications for the delivery of school-related services. In: Eid M, Larsen RJ, eds. The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guildford Press; 2008.
  • Verducci S, Gardner H. Good work: its nature, its nurture. In: Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B, eds. The science of well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. QS22 Quality Standard in Antenatal Care; 2012. Available from: http://publications.nice.org.uk/quality-standard-for-antenatal-care-qs22.
  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Subjective well-being three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 1999;25:276–302.
  • van Hoorn A, A short introduction to subjective well-being: its measurement, correlates and policy uses. Proceedings for the Conference ‘Is happiness measurable and what do those measures mean for policy?; April 2007; University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’.
  • Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol 2009;1:137–64.
  • Diener E, Emmons RA. The independence of positive and negative affect. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;69:130–41.
  • Lobel M, Cannella DL, Graham JE, et al. Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes. Health Psychol 2008;27:604–15.
  • Dunkel-Schetter C, Glynn L. Stress in pregnancy: empirical evidence and theoretical issue to guide interdisciplinary researchers. In: Contrada R, Baum A, eds. Handbook of stress. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2008.
  • Alderdice F, Lynn F, Lobel M. A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2012;33:62–77.
  • The National Maternity Review. Better births: improving outcomes of maternity services in England: a five year forward review for maternity care NHS England; 2016. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/national-maternity-review-report.pdf.
  • Angood PB, Armstrong EM, Ashton D, et al. Blueprint for action: steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system women’s. Health Iss 2010;20:S18–49.
  • Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie AM, et al. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: “What is, must still be best”. Birth 2003;30:75–82.
  • Alderdice F, Lynn F. Stress in pregnancy. Br J Midwif 2009;17:552–9.
  • Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect influence health? Psychol Bull 2005;131:925–71.
  • Jomeen J, Martin CR. Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a reliable screening tool in early pregnancy? Psychol Health 2004;19:787–800.
  • Kline P. Handbook of psychological testing. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2000.
  • Diener E, Napa Scollon C, Lucase RE. The evolving concept of subjective well-being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. In: Diener E, ed. Assessing well-being social indicators. Research Series Number 39. Springer; 2009.
  • Michaelson J, Abdallah S, Steuer N, Thompson S, Marks N. National accounts of well-being: bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet. London: nef; 2009.
  • Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Soc Psychol 1985;47:1105–17.
  • Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In: Diener E, ed. Assessing well-being social indicators. Research Series Number 39. Springer; 2009.
  • Bech P. Measuring the dimension of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. Qual Life Newslett 2004;32:15–16.
  • Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
  • Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1966;1:245–76.
  • Nunally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  • Cerny CA, Kaiser HF. A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivar Behav Res 1977;12:43–7.
  • Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M. Pregnancy and birth outcomes: a multi-level analysis of prenatal stress and birth weight. In: Baum AS, Revenson TA, Singer JE, eds. Handbook of health psychology. Psychology Press; 2010.
  • Rini CK, Dunkel Schetter C, Wadhwa PD, Sandman CA. Psychological adaptation and birth outcomes: the role of personal resources, stress, and sociocultural context in pregnancy. Health Psychol 1999;18:33–45.
  • Lobel M, de Vincent CJ, Kaminer A, Meyer BA. The impact of prenatal maternal stress and optimistic disposition on birth outcomes in medically high-risk women. Health Psychol 2000;19:544–53.
  • Alderdice F, Ayers S, Darwin Z, Green J, et al. Measuring psychological health in the perinatal period: workshop consensus statement, 19 March 2013. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2013;31:431–8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.