Perinatal factors related to pregnancy and childbirth satisfaction: a prospective cohort study

References

• Goodman P, Mackey MC, Tavakoli AS. Factors related to childbirth satisfaction. J Adv Nurs. 2004;46(2):212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijnders M, Baston H, Schönbeck Y, et al. Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth. 2008;35(2):107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grekin R, O'Hara MW. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(5):389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009;25(2):e49–e59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas CI, Wiegers TA, de Cock TP, et al. Client-related factors associated with a “less than good” experience of midwifery care during childbirth in the Netherlands. Birth. 2017;44(1):58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie AM, et al. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: “What is, must still be best”. Birth. 2003;30(2):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AV, Moriarty JP, Borgstrom C, et al. What can we learn from patient dissatisfaction? An analysis of dissatisfying events at an academic medical center. J Hosp Med. 2010;5(9):514–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redshaw M. Women as consumers of maternity care: measuring “satisfaction” or “dissatisfaction”? Birth. 2008;35(1):73–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, et al. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018;79(5):e1–e22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munstedt K, von Georgi R, Eichel V, et al. Wishes and expectations of pregnant women and their partners concerning delivery. J Perinatal Med. 2000;28(6):482–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschudin S, Alder J, Hendriksen S, et al. Previous birth experience and birth anxiety: predictors of caesarean section on demand? J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(3):175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spice K, Jones SL, Hadjistavropoulos HD, et al. Prenatal fear of childbirth and anxiety sensitivity. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;30(3):168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7(1):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Britton JR. The assessment of satisfaction with care in the perinatal period. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;33(2):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven CJ, Nuij C, Janssen-Rolf CR, Schuit E, et al. Predictors for failure of vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;200:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen C, Navathe R. Failed induction of labor. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(6):483–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meertens LJE, Scheepers HC, De Vries RG, et al. External validation study of first trimester obstetric prediction models (Expect Study I): research protocol and population characteristics. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017;6(10):e203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truijens SE, Pommer AM, van Runnard Heimel PJ, et al. Development of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ): evaluating quality of care as perceived by women who recently gave birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg HM, Defares PB, Spielberger CD. Handleiding bij de Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst ZBV: een nederlandstalige bewerking van de Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-DY: Swets & Zeitlinger [Manual for ‘De Zelf-Beoordelings Vragenlijst (ZBV)’, a Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI-DY: Swets & Zeitlinger]; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S467–S472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCP. SCP Statusscores: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau; 2017. [cited 2017 Aug 08]. Available from: http://www.scp.nl/Formulieren/Statusscores_opvragen.
   Google Scholar
• EuroQol-Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser GH, Eilers PH, Elferink-Stinkens PM, et al. New Dutch reference curves for birthweight by gestational age. Early Human Develop. 2009;85(12):737–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren S. Flexible imputation of missing data. 2nd. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Truijens SE, Banga FR, Fransen AF, et al. The effect of multiprofessional simulation-based obstetric team training on patient-reported quality of care: a pilot study. Simul Healthc. 2015;10(4):210–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berman DM, Tan LL, Cheng TL. Surveys and response rates. Pediatrics Rev. 2015;36(8):364–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338(jun29 1):b2393–b2393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlström A, Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. The meaning of a very positive birth experience: focus groups discussions with women. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2015;15(1):251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzert M, Hermus MA, Scheerhagen M, et al. Experiences of women who planned birth in a birth centre compared to alternative planned places of birth. Results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study. Midwifery. 2016;40:70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Bruster S, et al. Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care. QSHC. 2002;11(4):335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Borjesson B, Paperin C, Lindell M. Maternal support during the first year of infancy. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(6):588–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander MH, van Hastenberg E, van Dillen J, et al. Preventing traumatic childbirth experiences: 2192 women’s perceptions and views. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20(4):515–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, et al. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2015;(9):Cd004667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerts CC, van Dillen J, Klomp T, et al. Satisfaction with caregivers during labour among low risk women in the Netherlands: the association with planned place of birth and transfer of care during labour. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2017;17(1):229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser G. Obstetric care in the Netherlands: relic or example?. JOGC. 2012;34(10):971–975.
   Google Scholar
• Boesveld IC, Valentijn PP, Hitzert M, et al. An approach to measuring integrated care within a maternity care system: experiences from the maternity care network study and the Dutch Birth Centre Study. Int J Integr Care. 2017;17(2):6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geboortezorg EZI. Zorgstandaard Integrale Geboortezorg. Utrecht: College Perinatale Zorg; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schoorel EN, Vankan E, Scheepers HC, et al. Involving women in personalised decision-making on mode of delivery after caesarean section: the development and pilot testing of a patient decision aid. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2014;121(2):202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdok H, Jans S, Verhoeven C, et al. Opinions of maternity care professionals and other stakeholders about integration of maternity care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2016;16(1):188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED. Continuity of caregivers for care during pregnancy and childbirth. Birth. 2000;27(3):218–218.
   Google Scholar
• Yonkers KA, Wisner KL, Stewart DE, et al. The management of depression during pregnancy: a report from the American Psychiatric Association and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(3):703–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: Clinical Management and Service Guidance: Updated edition. Leicester (UK): British Psychological Society; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Chojenta C, William J, Martin MA, et al. The impact of a history of poor mental health on health care costs in the perinatal period. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019;22:467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermes W, Tamsma JT, Grootendorst DC, et al. Cardiovascular risk estimation in women with a history of hypertensive pregnancy disorders at term: a longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2013;13(1):126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer CK, Swaminathan B, Hanley AJ, et al. Each degree of glucose intolerance in pregnancy predicts distinct trajectories of beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, and glycemia in the first 3 years postpartum. Dia Care. 2014;37(12):3262–3269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker Edmonds B. Shared decision-making and decision support: their role in obstetrics and Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26(6):523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar