Emotional experiences of women who access early pregnancy assessment units: a qualitative investigation

References

• Carter D, Misri S, Tomfohr L. Psychologic aspects of early pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(1):154–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volgsten H, Jansson C, Skoog Svanberg A, et al. Longitudinal study of emotional experiences, grief and depressive symptoms in women and men after miscarriage. Midwifery. 2018;64:23–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edey K, Draycott T, Akande V. Early pregnancy assessment units. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(1):146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkovic D, Overton C, Bender-Atik R. Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage. BMJ. 2013;346(7913):f3676–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Lázaro Campillo I, Meaney S, McNamara K, et al. Psychological and support interventions to reduce levels of stress, anxiety or depression on women’s subsequent pregnancy with a history of miscarriage: an empty systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e017802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, et al. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;191:62–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers S, Coates R Matthey S. Identifying perinatal anxiety. In: Milgrom J, Gemmill AW, editors. Identifying perinatal depression and anxiety: evidence-based practice in screening, psychosocial assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2015. p. 93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Rubertsson C, Hellström J, Cross M, et al. Anxiety in early pregnancy: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17(3):221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverio SA, Easter A, Storey C, et al. Preliminary findings on the experiences of care for parents who suffered perinatal bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Pregnancy Childb. 2021;21(840):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller PA, Kerns D, Klier CM. Anxiety following miscarriage and the subsequent pregnancy: a review of the literature and future directions. J Psychosom Res. 2004;56(1):35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszek AM, Boyle FM, Belizán JM, et al. Care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: an international survey of parents. BJOG. 2018;125(2):193–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg MMJ, Dancet EAF, Erlikh T, et al. Patient-centered early pregnancy care: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies on the perspectives of women and their partners. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(1):106–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memtsa M, Goodhart V, Ambler G, et al. Variations in the organisation of and outcomes from early pregnancy assessment units: the VESPA mixed-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2020;8(46):1–138.
   Google Scholar
• Memtsa M, Goodhart V, Ambler G, et al. Differences in the organisation of early pregnancy units and the effect of senior clinician presence, volume of patients and weekend opening on emergency hospital admissions: findings from the VESPA study. PLOS One. 2021;16(11):e0260534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JA, Silverio SA, Barrett G, et al. Women’s experiences of early pregnancy assessment unit services: a qualitative investigation. BJOG. 2021;128(13):2116–2125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qual Inq. 2014;20(8):1045–1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mix Method Res. 2007;1(1):48–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Sansoni J, Hayes L, et al. Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the short assessment of patient satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(5):527–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine A. Duration, dominance and depth in telephone and face-to-face interviews: a comparative exploration. Int J Qual Method. 2011;10(3):202–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:117–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong D, Gosling A, Weinman J, et al. The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: an empirical study. Sociology. 1997;31(3):597–606.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell JL, Quincy C, Osserman J, et al. Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociol Method Res. 2013;42(3):294–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharathan R, Farag M, Hayes K. The value of multidisciplinary team meetings within an early pregnancy assessment unit. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(6):789–793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox R, Savage R, Evans T, et al. Early pregnancy assessment; a role for the gynaecology nurse-practitioner. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;19(6):615–616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brien N. An early pregnancy assessment unit. Brit J Midwifery. 1996;4(4):187–190.
   Google Scholar
• Tan TL, Khoo CLK, Sawant S. Impact of consultant-led care in early pregnancy unit. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(5):412–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Da Costa D, Zelkowitz P, Nguyen T-V, et al. Mental health help-seeking patterns and perceived barriers for care among nulliparous pregnant women. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;21(6):757–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faisal-Cury A, Rossi Menezes P. Prevalence of anxiety and depression during pregnancy in a private setting sample. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007;10(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broquet K. Psychological reactions to pregnancy loss. Prim Care Update OB/GYNS. 1999;6(1):12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Byatt N, Cox L, Moore Simas TA, et al. How obstetric settings can help address gaps in psychiatric care for pregnant and postpartum women with bipolar disorder. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;21(5):543–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megnin-Viggars O, Symington I, Howard LM, et al. Experience of care for mental health problems in the antenatal or postnatal period for women in the UK: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(6):745–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Feng C, Bowen A, et al. Latent trajectory groups of perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms from pregnancy to early postpartum and their antenatal risk factors. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018;21(6):689–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poleshuck EL, Woods J. Psychologists partnering with obstetricians and gynecologists: meeting the need for patient-centered models of women’s health care delivery. Am Psychol. 2014;69(4):344–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCOG. High quality women’s health care: a proposal for change; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Coons HL, Morgenstern D, Hoffman EM, et al. Psychologists in women’s primary care and obstetrics-gynecology: consultation and treatment issues. In: Frank RG, McDaniel SH, Bray JH, editors. Primary care psychology. Washington, DC: APA; 2004. p. 209–226.
   Google Scholar
• Geller PA, Psaros C, Kornfield SL. Satisfaction with pregnancy loss aftercare: are women getting what they want? Arch Womens Ment Health. 2010;13(2):111–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayment‐Jones H, Harris J, Harden A, et al. How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis. Birth. 2019;46(3):461–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar