Advanced search
Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 36, 2017 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
148
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Bahram EshraghiEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
,
Mansooreh Jamshidian-TehraniEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
&
Arash MirmohammadsadeghiEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 215-217 | Received 11 Sep 2015, Accepted 26 May 2017, Published online: 19 Jun 2017

References

  • Quickert MH, Dryden RM. Probes for intubation in lacrimal drainage. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1970; 74:431–433.
  • Komínek P, Cervenka S, Pniak T, et al. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249:1729–1733.
  • Fayet B, Bernard JA. A monocanalicular stent with self-stabilizing meatic fixation in surgery of excretory lacrimal ducts. Initial results. Ophtalmologie 1990; 4:351–357.
  • Andalib D, Gharabaghi D, Nabai R, Abbaszadeh M. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal ductobstruction. J AAPOS 2010; 14:421–424.
  • Lee H, Ahn J, Lee JM, Park M, Baek S. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23:1010–1014.
  • Fayet B, Bernard JA, Assouline M. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct impotency in children: a comparative study. Orbit 1993; 12:149–156.
  • Eshragi B, Fard MA, Masomian B, Akbari M. Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Mid East Afr J Ophthalmol 2013; 20:349–352.
  • Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Parvaresh MM, et al. Late and very late initial probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what is the cause of failure? Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87:1151–1153.
  • Eshraghi B, Akbari MR, Fard MA, et al. The prevalence of amblyogenic factors in children with persistent congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252:1847–1852.
  • Kaufman LM, Guay-Bhatia LAG. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1998; 105:336–341.
  • Eshraghi B, Aghajani A, Kasaei A, et al. “Pushed” stent intubation for treatment of complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014; 24:650–654.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.