Monocanalicular versus Bicanalicular Intubation in External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

REFERENCES

• Anastas C N, Potts M J, Raiter J. Mini Monoka silicone monocanalicular lacrimal stents: Subjective and objective outcomes. Orbit Sep, 2001; 20(3)189–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ariturk N, Oge I, Oge F, et al. Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in adults. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77: 481–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BD Visitec DCR set (O'Donoghue), Available at: http://catalog.bd.com/bdCat/viewProduct.doCustomer?productNumber=585011 Accessed April 15, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Ben Simon G J, Joseph J, Lee S, et al. External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(8)1463–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkat C N, Lucarelli M J. Tear meniscus level as an indicator of nasolacrimal obstruction. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 344–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dortzbach R K, France T D, Kushner B J, et al. Silicone intubation for obstruction of the nasolacrimal duct in children. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 94: 585–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayet B, Assouline M, Bernard J A. Monocanalicular nasolacrimal duct intubation [letter]. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1795–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fayet B, Bernard J A, Assouline M. Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct impotency in children: a comparative study. Orbit 1993; 12: 149–56
   Google Scholar
• Frueh B R. Silicone intubation for the treatment of congenital lacrimal duct obstruction: successful results removing the tubes after six weeks [discussion]. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 795
   Google Scholar
• Gauba V, Islam T, Saleh G, Zuberbuhler B, Vize C. The practice of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery by ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom (UK). Orbit 2008; 27(4)279–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glatt H J. Monocanalicular nasolacrimal duct intubation [letter]. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1794–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein S M, Goldstein J B, Katowitz J A. Comparison of monocanalicular stenting and balloon dacryoplasty in secondary treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction after failed primary probing. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg Sep, 2004; 20(5)352–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim H A, Batterbury M, Banhegyi G, McGalliard J. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study. Ophthal Surg Lasers 2001; 32: 220–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kashkouli M B, Beigi B, Astbury N. Acquired external punctal stenosis: surgical management and long-term follow-up. Orbit Jun, 2005; 24(2)73–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kashkouli M B, Kempster R C, Galloway G D, Beigi B. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg Mar, 2005; 21(2)142–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashkouli M B, Parvaresh M M, Modarreszadeh M, Hashemi M, Beigi B. Factors affecting the success of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Orbit 2003; 22: 247–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufman L M, Guay-Bhatia L A. Monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes for the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology Feb, 1998; 105(2)336–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leone C R, Jr., Van Germert J V. The success rate of silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthal Surg 1990; 21: 90–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansour K, Sere M, Oey A G, Bruin K J, Blanksma L J. Long-term patient satisfaction of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmologica 2005; 219: 9
   Google Scholar
• Mäntynen J, Yoshitsugu M, Rautiainen M. Results of dacryocystorhinostomy in 96 patients. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 529: 187–9, suppl
   Google Scholar
• Mauriello J A, Abdelsalam A. Use of a modified monocanalicular silicone stent in 33 eyelids. Ophthal Surg Lasers 1996; 27: 929–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazzoli R A, Raymond W R, IV, Ainbinder D J, et al. Monocanalicular intubation for dacryostenosis in oculo-auriculo-vertebral dysplasia (hemifacial microsomia) with congenital corneal anesthesia. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 16: 55–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliori M E, Putterman A M. Silicone intubation for the treatment of congenital lacrimal duct obstruction: successful results removing the tubes after six weeks. Ophthalmology 1988; 95: 792–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mini Monoka Monocanalicular intubation set. FCI, Available at: http://www.fci-ophthalmics.com/mini_monoka.htm Accessed May 15, 2007
   Google Scholar
• Munk P L, Lin D TC, Morris D C. Epiphora: treatment by means of dacryocystoplasty with balloon dilation of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. Radiology 1990; 177: 687–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratliff C D, Meyer D R. Silicone intubation without intranasal fixation for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J Ophthalmol 1994; 118: 781–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rootman D S, Insler M S, Wolfley D E. Canaliculitis caused by Mycobacterium chelonae after lacrimal intubation with silicone tube. Can J Ophthalmol 1989; 24: 221–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarbet K J, Custer P L. External dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical success, patient satisfaction and economic cost. Ophthalmology 1995; 102: 1065–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloudios A, Harvey J T, Philippon M. Long-term placement of silastic nasolacrimal tubes. Ophthal Sur 1991; 22: 225–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welham R A, Henderson P H. Results of dacryocystorhinostomy: analysis of causes for failure. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1973; 93: 601–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zappia R J, Milder B. Lacrimal drainage function. 2. The fluorescein dye disappearance test. Amer J Ophthalmol 1972; 74: 160–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar