Effects of dialect variation on the semantic predictability benefit

REFERENCES

• Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 520–529.
   Google Scholar
• Adank, P., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The effect of an unfamiliar regional accent on spoken word comprehension. In J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1925–1928. Saarbrücken, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Aydelott, J., & Bates, E. (2004). Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, W., Eddington, D., & Nay, L. (2009). Dialect identification: The effects of region of origin and amount of experience. American Speech, 84, 48–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2008). Semantic and phonetic enhancement for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 2339–2349.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Bradlow, A. R. (2008). Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech, 51, 175–198.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2008). Effects of semantic predictability and regional dialect on vowel space reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 1682–1688.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Tamati, T. N. (2010). Lexical neighborhoods and phonological confusability in cross-dialect word recognition in noise. Laboratory Phonology, 1, 65–92.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2006). The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects. Speech Communication, 48, 633–644.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2007). Free classification of regional dialects of American English. Journal of Phonetics, 35, 421–438.
   Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., Pisoni, D. B., & de Jong, K. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1661–1676.
   Google Scholar
• Creelman, C. D. (1957). Case of the unknown talker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 655.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R., & Giolas, T. G. (1974). Sentence intelligibility as a function of key word selection. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 631–637.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2004). Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 352–361.
   Google Scholar
• Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1276–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 325–349.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, J., Nolan, A., & Drager, K. (2006). From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23, 351–379.
   Google Scholar
• Impe, L., Geeraerts, D., & Speelman, D. (2008). Mutual intelligibility of standard and regional Dutch language varieties. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2, 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., & Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 1337–1351.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., & Ash, S. (1997). Understanding Birmingham. In C. Bernstein, T. Nunnally, & R. Sabino (Eds.), Language variety in the South revisited (pp. 508–573). Tuscaloosa, AL: Alabama University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98–104.
   Google Scholar
• Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6, 172–187.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, H. M. (1946). Understandability of speech in noise as affected by region of origin of speaker and listener. Speech Monographs, 13(2), 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., Brooks, J., & Cooke, M. (2009). Recognizing speech under a processing load: Dissociating energetic from informational factors. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 203–243.
   Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., White, L., & Melhorn, J. F. (2005). Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 477–500.
   Google Scholar
• Maye, J., Aslin, R. N., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). The Weckud Wetch of the Wast: Lexical adaptation to a novel accent. Cognitive Science, 32, 543–562.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, L. H., Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1997). Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 686–693.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365–378.
   Google Scholar
• Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 62–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on “normalization” in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9–32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plichta, B., Preston, D., & Rakerd, B. (2007). “It's too hat in here?” The perception of NCS a-fronting. Linguistica Atlantica, 27–28, 92–95.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart-Smith, J. (2007). The influence of the media. In C. Llamas, L. Mullany, & P. Stockwell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics (pp. 140–148). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501.
   Google Scholar